Cargando…

The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review

To determine if bedside rounds, compared with other forms of hospital ward rounds, improve learning outcomes in medical education. METHOD: For this systematic review, the authors searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception through February 20, 2020. Experimental studies were included if...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratelle, John T., Gallagher, Caitlyn N., Sawatsky, Adam P., Kashiwagi, Deanne T., Schouten, Will M., Gonzalo, Jed D., Beckman, Thomas J., West, Colin P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004586
_version_ 1784712091328839680
author Ratelle, John T.
Gallagher, Caitlyn N.
Sawatsky, Adam P.
Kashiwagi, Deanne T.
Schouten, Will M.
Gonzalo, Jed D.
Beckman, Thomas J.
West, Colin P.
author_facet Ratelle, John T.
Gallagher, Caitlyn N.
Sawatsky, Adam P.
Kashiwagi, Deanne T.
Schouten, Will M.
Gonzalo, Jed D.
Beckman, Thomas J.
West, Colin P.
author_sort Ratelle, John T.
collection PubMed
description To determine if bedside rounds, compared with other forms of hospital ward rounds, improve learning outcomes in medical education. METHOD: For this systematic review, the authors searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception through February 20, 2020. Experimental studies were included if they (1) compared bedside rounds to any other form of rounds in a hospital-based setting, and (2) reported a quantitative comparison of a learning outcome (e.g., learner reaction, knowledge, skills, behavior, health care delivery) among physicians-in-training (medical students, residents, fellows). Extraction elements were summarized using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis of design, implementation, and outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized trials. All studies involved resident physicians, and 11 also involved medical students. The design and implementation of bedside rounds varied widely, with most studies (n = 13) involving cointerventions (e.g., staff education, real-time order entry). Of the 15 studies that reported learner satisfaction, 7 favored bedside rounds, 4 favored the control, and 4 were equivocal. Of the 4 studies reporting an outcome of learners’ knowledge and skills, 2 favored bedside rounds and 2 were equivocal. Of the 8 studies that reported on learner behavior (e.g., bedside communication with patients), 5 favored bedside rounds, 1 favored the control, and 2 were equivocal. Finally, of the 14 studies that reported a health care delivery outcome (e.g., teamwork, rounding time), 8 favored bedside rounds and 6 were equivocal. Due to the high risk of bias and unexplained heterogeneity across studies, the overall strength of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: In hospital-based settings, learners’ satisfaction with bedside rounds is mixed. However, bedside rounds appear to have a positive effect on learner behavior and health care delivery. Given their potential value, additional research is needed to identify barriers to and facilitators of educationally successful bedside rounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9126262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91262622022-05-25 The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review Ratelle, John T. Gallagher, Caitlyn N. Sawatsky, Adam P. Kashiwagi, Deanne T. Schouten, Will M. Gonzalo, Jed D. Beckman, Thomas J. West, Colin P. Acad Med Reviews To determine if bedside rounds, compared with other forms of hospital ward rounds, improve learning outcomes in medical education. METHOD: For this systematic review, the authors searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception through February 20, 2020. Experimental studies were included if they (1) compared bedside rounds to any other form of rounds in a hospital-based setting, and (2) reported a quantitative comparison of a learning outcome (e.g., learner reaction, knowledge, skills, behavior, health care delivery) among physicians-in-training (medical students, residents, fellows). Extraction elements were summarized using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis of design, implementation, and outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized trials. All studies involved resident physicians, and 11 also involved medical students. The design and implementation of bedside rounds varied widely, with most studies (n = 13) involving cointerventions (e.g., staff education, real-time order entry). Of the 15 studies that reported learner satisfaction, 7 favored bedside rounds, 4 favored the control, and 4 were equivocal. Of the 4 studies reporting an outcome of learners’ knowledge and skills, 2 favored bedside rounds and 2 were equivocal. Of the 8 studies that reported on learner behavior (e.g., bedside communication with patients), 5 favored bedside rounds, 1 favored the control, and 2 were equivocal. Finally, of the 14 studies that reported a health care delivery outcome (e.g., teamwork, rounding time), 8 favored bedside rounds and 6 were equivocal. Due to the high risk of bias and unexplained heterogeneity across studies, the overall strength of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: In hospital-based settings, learners’ satisfaction with bedside rounds is mixed. However, bedside rounds appear to have a positive effect on learner behavior and health care delivery. Given their potential value, additional research is needed to identify barriers to and facilitators of educationally successful bedside rounds. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-11 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9126262/ /pubmed/35020612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004586 Text en Copyright © 2022 by the Association of American Medical Colleges https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reviews
Ratelle, John T.
Gallagher, Caitlyn N.
Sawatsky, Adam P.
Kashiwagi, Deanne T.
Schouten, Will M.
Gonzalo, Jed D.
Beckman, Thomas J.
West, Colin P.
The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
title The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
title_full The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
title_short The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
title_sort effect of bedside rounds on learning outcomes in medical education: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004586
work_keys_str_mv AT ratellejohnt theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT gallaghercaitlynn theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT sawatskyadamp theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT kashiwagideannet theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT schoutenwillm theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT gonzalojedd theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT beckmanthomasj theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT westcolinp theeffectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT ratellejohnt effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT gallaghercaitlynn effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT sawatskyadamp effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT kashiwagideannet effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT schoutenwillm effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT gonzalojedd effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT beckmanthomasj effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT westcolinp effectofbedsideroundsonlearningoutcomesinmedicaleducationasystematicreview