Cargando…

Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers

Global access to radiotherapy (RT) is inequitable, with obstacles to implementing modern technologies in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). The Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA) is a web-based automated RT planning software package intended to increase accessibility of high-quality RT plann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGinnis, Gwendolyn J., Ning, Matthew S., Beadle, Beth M., Joubert, Nanette, Shaw, William, Trauernich, Christoph, Simonds, Hannah, Grover, Surbhi, Cardenas, Carlos E., Court, Laurence E., Smith, Grace L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00431
_version_ 1784712150559752192
author McGinnis, Gwendolyn J.
Ning, Matthew S.
Beadle, Beth M.
Joubert, Nanette
Shaw, William
Trauernich, Christoph
Simonds, Hannah
Grover, Surbhi
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Court, Laurence E.
Smith, Grace L.
author_facet McGinnis, Gwendolyn J.
Ning, Matthew S.
Beadle, Beth M.
Joubert, Nanette
Shaw, William
Trauernich, Christoph
Simonds, Hannah
Grover, Surbhi
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Court, Laurence E.
Smith, Grace L.
author_sort McGinnis, Gwendolyn J.
collection PubMed
description Global access to radiotherapy (RT) is inequitable, with obstacles to implementing modern technologies in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). The Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA) is a web-based automated RT planning software package intended to increase accessibility of high-quality RT planning. We surveyed LMIC RT providers to identify barriers and facilitators of future RPA deployment and uptake. METHODS: RT providers underwent a pilot RPA teaching session in sub-Saharan Africa (Botswana, South Africa, and Tanzania) and Central America (Guatemala). Thirty providers (30 of 33, 90.9% response rate) participated in a postsession survey. RESULTS: Respondents included physicians (n = 10, 33%), physicists (n = 9, 30%), dosimetrists (n = 8, 27%), residents/registrars (n = 1, 3.3%), radiation therapists (n = 1, 3.3%), and administrators (n = 1, 3.3%). Overall, 86.7% expressed interest in RPA; more respondents expected that RPA would be usable in 2 years (80%) compared with now (60%). Anticipated barriers were lack of reliable internet (80%), potential subscription fees (60%), and need for functionality in additional disease sites (48%). Expected facilitators included decreased workload (80%), decreased planning time (72%), and ability to treat more patients (64%). Forty-four percent anticipated that RPA would help transition from 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional techniques and 48% from 3-dimensional to intensity-modulated radiation treatment. Of a maximum acceptability/feasibility score of 60, physicians (45.6, standard deviation [SD] = 7.5) and dosimetrists (44.3, SD = 9.1) had lower scores than the mean for all respondents (48.3, SD = 7.7) although variation in scores by roles was not significantly different (P = .21). CONCLUSION: These data provide an early assessment and create an initial framework to identify stakeholder needs and establish priorities to address barriers and promote facilitators of RPA deployment and uptake across global sites, as well as to tailor to needs in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9126530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91265302022-05-24 Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers McGinnis, Gwendolyn J. Ning, Matthew S. Beadle, Beth M. Joubert, Nanette Shaw, William Trauernich, Christoph Simonds, Hannah Grover, Surbhi Cardenas, Carlos E. Court, Laurence E. Smith, Grace L. JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Global access to radiotherapy (RT) is inequitable, with obstacles to implementing modern technologies in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). The Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA) is a web-based automated RT planning software package intended to increase accessibility of high-quality RT planning. We surveyed LMIC RT providers to identify barriers and facilitators of future RPA deployment and uptake. METHODS: RT providers underwent a pilot RPA teaching session in sub-Saharan Africa (Botswana, South Africa, and Tanzania) and Central America (Guatemala). Thirty providers (30 of 33, 90.9% response rate) participated in a postsession survey. RESULTS: Respondents included physicians (n = 10, 33%), physicists (n = 9, 30%), dosimetrists (n = 8, 27%), residents/registrars (n = 1, 3.3%), radiation therapists (n = 1, 3.3%), and administrators (n = 1, 3.3%). Overall, 86.7% expressed interest in RPA; more respondents expected that RPA would be usable in 2 years (80%) compared with now (60%). Anticipated barriers were lack of reliable internet (80%), potential subscription fees (60%), and need for functionality in additional disease sites (48%). Expected facilitators included decreased workload (80%), decreased planning time (72%), and ability to treat more patients (64%). Forty-four percent anticipated that RPA would help transition from 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional techniques and 48% from 3-dimensional to intensity-modulated radiation treatment. Of a maximum acceptability/feasibility score of 60, physicians (45.6, standard deviation [SD] = 7.5) and dosimetrists (44.3, SD = 9.1) had lower scores than the mean for all respondents (48.3, SD = 7.7) although variation in scores by roles was not significantly different (P = .21). CONCLUSION: These data provide an early assessment and create an initial framework to identify stakeholder needs and establish priorities to address barriers and promote facilitators of RPA deployment and uptake across global sites, as well as to tailor to needs in LMICs. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9126530/ /pubmed/35537104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00431 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
McGinnis, Gwendolyn J.
Ning, Matthew S.
Beadle, Beth M.
Joubert, Nanette
Shaw, William
Trauernich, Christoph
Simonds, Hannah
Grover, Surbhi
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Court, Laurence E.
Smith, Grace L.
Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers
title Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers
title_full Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers
title_fullStr Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers
title_short Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers
title_sort barriers and facilitators of implementing automated radiotherapy planning: a multisite survey of low- and middle-income country radiation oncology providers
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00431
work_keys_str_mv AT mcginnisgwendolynj barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT ningmatthews barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT beadlebethm barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT joubertnanette barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT shawwilliam barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT trauernichchristoph barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT simondshannah barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT groversurbhi barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT cardenascarlose barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT courtlaurencee barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders
AT smithgracel barriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingautomatedradiotherapyplanningamultisitesurveyoflowandmiddleincomecountryradiationoncologyproviders