Cargando…

Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To analyze telemedicine diagnostic accuracy in patients with respiratory infections during COVID-19 pandemic compared to face-to-face evaluation in the emergency department. METHODS: Randomized, unicentric study between September 2020 and November 2020 in patients with any respiratory sym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas, Moreira, Flavio Tocci, Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato, Amicis, Karine De, Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal, Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo, Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira, de Souza, José Leão, Cordioli, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649057
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6800
_version_ 1784712161220624384
author Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas
Moreira, Flavio Tocci
Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato
Amicis, Karine De
Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal
Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo
Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira
de Souza, José Leão
Cordioli, Eduardo
author_facet Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas
Moreira, Flavio Tocci
Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato
Amicis, Karine De
Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal
Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo
Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira
de Souza, José Leão
Cordioli, Eduardo
author_sort Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze telemedicine diagnostic accuracy in patients with respiratory infections during COVID-19 pandemic compared to face-to-face evaluation in the emergency department. METHODS: Randomized, unicentric study between September 2020 and November 2020 in patients with any respiratory symptom (exclusion criteria: age >65 years, chronic heart or lung diseases, immunosuppressed). Patients were randomized 1:1 for brief telemedicine followed by face-to-face consultation or direct face-to-face evaluation. The primary endpoint was the International Classification of Diseases code. The secondary analysis comprised length of stay, diagnostic test ordering, medical prescription, and proposed destination. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 36.3±9.7 years old, 57.1% were women, and 81.6% had diagnostic test ordered. Mean grouped by International Classification of Diseases code for upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngotonsillitis, and sinusitis showed no difference between study groups or secondary endpoints. The Telemedicine Group was representative of the population usually evaluated in this center. In the Telemedicine Group (n=48), 18.7% patients would be referred for evaluation at the emergency department. The distribution of diagnoses by telemedicine was 67.4% for upper respiratory tract infection, 2.3% for pharyngotonsillitis, and 0% for sinusitis, being statistically similar to the subsequent face-to-face assessment, respectively: 72.1%, 11.6% and 7% (Kappa 0.386 [95%CI: 0.112-0.66]; p=0.536). Telemedicine ordered COVID-19 molecular (RT-PCR) tests in 76.5% versus 79.4% in face-to-face evaluation (Kappa 0.715 [95%CI: 0.413-1]; p>0.999). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic telemedicine consultation of low-risk patients with acute respiratory symptoms is not inferior to face-to-face evaluation at emergency department. Telemedicine is to be reinforced in the health care system as a strategy for the initial assessment of acute patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04806477
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9126601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91266012022-05-26 Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas Moreira, Flavio Tocci Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato Amicis, Karine De Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira de Souza, José Leão Cordioli, Eduardo Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze telemedicine diagnostic accuracy in patients with respiratory infections during COVID-19 pandemic compared to face-to-face evaluation in the emergency department. METHODS: Randomized, unicentric study between September 2020 and November 2020 in patients with any respiratory symptom (exclusion criteria: age >65 years, chronic heart or lung diseases, immunosuppressed). Patients were randomized 1:1 for brief telemedicine followed by face-to-face consultation or direct face-to-face evaluation. The primary endpoint was the International Classification of Diseases code. The secondary analysis comprised length of stay, diagnostic test ordering, medical prescription, and proposed destination. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 36.3±9.7 years old, 57.1% were women, and 81.6% had diagnostic test ordered. Mean grouped by International Classification of Diseases code for upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngotonsillitis, and sinusitis showed no difference between study groups or secondary endpoints. The Telemedicine Group was representative of the population usually evaluated in this center. In the Telemedicine Group (n=48), 18.7% patients would be referred for evaluation at the emergency department. The distribution of diagnoses by telemedicine was 67.4% for upper respiratory tract infection, 2.3% for pharyngotonsillitis, and 0% for sinusitis, being statistically similar to the subsequent face-to-face assessment, respectively: 72.1%, 11.6% and 7% (Kappa 0.386 [95%CI: 0.112-0.66]; p=0.536). Telemedicine ordered COVID-19 molecular (RT-PCR) tests in 76.5% versus 79.4% in face-to-face evaluation (Kappa 0.715 [95%CI: 0.413-1]; p>0.999). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic telemedicine consultation of low-risk patients with acute respiratory symptoms is not inferior to face-to-face evaluation at emergency department. Telemedicine is to be reinforced in the health care system as a strategy for the initial assessment of acute patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04806477 Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9126601/ /pubmed/35649057 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6800 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas
Moreira, Flavio Tocci
Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato
Amicis, Karine De
Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal
Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo
Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira
de Souza, José Leão
Cordioli, Eduardo
Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
title Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
title_full Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
title_short Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
title_sort telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649057
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6800
work_keys_str_mv AT accorsitarsoaugustoduenhas telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT moreiraflaviotocci telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT pedrotticarloshenriquesartorato telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT amiciskarinede telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT correiarenatafariasvidigal telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT morbeckrenataalbaladejo telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT medeirosfernandaferreira telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT desouzajoseleao telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial
AT cordiolieduardo telemedicinediagnosisofacuterespiratorytractinfectionpatientsisnotinferiortofacetofaceconsultationarandomizedtrial