Cargando…

The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic leg length discrepancies (LLDs) are a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty. Many surgeons incorporate an intraoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, to help prevent LLD; however, obtaining a high-quality radiograph is often difficult. The purpose of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsang, Henry, Bouz, Tony, Kwan, Kevin, French, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.009
_version_ 1784712200498184192
author Tsang, Henry
Bouz, Tony
Kwan, Kevin
French, Michael
author_facet Tsang, Henry
Bouz, Tony
Kwan, Kevin
French, Michael
author_sort Tsang, Henry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Symptomatic leg length discrepancies (LLDs) are a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty. Many surgeons incorporate an intraoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, to help prevent LLD; however, obtaining a high-quality radiograph is often difficult. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of estimating LLD using different radiographic reference landmarks on suboptimal anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We obtained 2 pelvis Sawbones models with attached femurs and created a true shortening of the left femur of the experimental model by 7 mm. We then obtained a series of radiographs manipulating each model in standardized increments for a total of 66 different permutations of suboptimal radiographs. Each radiograph was evaluated for LLD by 2 separate orthopedic surgeons using reference lines bisecting the following anatomic landmarks: ischial tuberosities, acetabular teardrops, obturator foramina, sacroiliac joints, and the femoral heads, to the lesser trochanters. The accuracy and reliability of each line were then analyzed. RESULTS: The obturator foramina line yielded the most reliable LLD estimates with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.939. This reference line was also the most accurate, with an average difference of 1.5 mm from the true LLD (P < .001), with 95% confidence to be within 1.8 mm. CONCLUSION: The obturator foramen reference line on an intraoperative radiograph is an accurate and reliable tool that should be utilized by joint replacement surgeons to estimate LLD even if the radiograph is suboptimal. This estimate is reliably reproduced among multiple observers and puts the estimate within 1.8 mm of a true LLD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9126763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91267632022-05-25 The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length? Tsang, Henry Bouz, Tony Kwan, Kevin French, Michael Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Symptomatic leg length discrepancies (LLDs) are a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty. Many surgeons incorporate an intraoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, to help prevent LLD; however, obtaining a high-quality radiograph is often difficult. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of estimating LLD using different radiographic reference landmarks on suboptimal anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We obtained 2 pelvis Sawbones models with attached femurs and created a true shortening of the left femur of the experimental model by 7 mm. We then obtained a series of radiographs manipulating each model in standardized increments for a total of 66 different permutations of suboptimal radiographs. Each radiograph was evaluated for LLD by 2 separate orthopedic surgeons using reference lines bisecting the following anatomic landmarks: ischial tuberosities, acetabular teardrops, obturator foramina, sacroiliac joints, and the femoral heads, to the lesser trochanters. The accuracy and reliability of each line were then analyzed. RESULTS: The obturator foramina line yielded the most reliable LLD estimates with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.939. This reference line was also the most accurate, with an average difference of 1.5 mm from the true LLD (P < .001), with 95% confidence to be within 1.8 mm. CONCLUSION: The obturator foramen reference line on an intraoperative radiograph is an accurate and reliable tool that should be utilized by joint replacement surgeons to estimate LLD even if the radiograph is suboptimal. This estimate is reliably reproduced among multiple observers and puts the estimate within 1.8 mm of a true LLD. Elsevier 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9126763/ /pubmed/35620588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.009 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tsang, Henry
Bouz, Tony
Kwan, Kevin
French, Michael
The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?
title The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?
title_full The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?
title_fullStr The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?
title_full_unstemmed The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?
title_short The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?
title_sort intraoperative pelvic radiograph during total hip arthroplasty: is it reliable to estimate leg length?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.009
work_keys_str_mv AT tsanghenry theintraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT bouztony theintraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT kwankevin theintraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT frenchmichael theintraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT tsanghenry intraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT bouztony intraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT kwankevin intraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength
AT frenchmichael intraoperativepelvicradiographduringtotalhiparthroplastyisitreliabletoestimateleglength