Cargando…

Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the reproducibility of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume, measured on scans performed using an open-bore magnetic resonance scanner. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for bariatric surgery, aged between 18 and 65 years who agreed to undergo cardiac imagi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Secchi, Francesco, Asteria, Carmela, Monti, Caterina B., Malavazos, Alexis Elias, Capra, Davide, Alì, Marco, Giassi, Cecilia L. A., Francesconi, Simona, Basilico, Sara, Giovanelli, Alessandro, Morricone, Lelio, Sardanelli, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00274-0
_version_ 1784712251782987776
author Secchi, Francesco
Asteria, Carmela
Monti, Caterina B.
Malavazos, Alexis Elias
Capra, Davide
Alì, Marco
Giassi, Cecilia L. A.
Francesconi, Simona
Basilico, Sara
Giovanelli, Alessandro
Morricone, Lelio
Sardanelli, Francesco
author_facet Secchi, Francesco
Asteria, Carmela
Monti, Caterina B.
Malavazos, Alexis Elias
Capra, Davide
Alì, Marco
Giassi, Cecilia L. A.
Francesconi, Simona
Basilico, Sara
Giovanelli, Alessandro
Morricone, Lelio
Sardanelli, Francesco
author_sort Secchi, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the reproducibility of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume, measured on scans performed using an open-bore magnetic resonance scanner. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for bariatric surgery, aged between 18 and 65 years who agreed to undergo cardiac imaging (MRI), were prospectively enrolled. All those with cardiac pathology or contraindications to MRI were excluded. MRI was performed on a 1.0-T open-bore scanner, and EAT was segmented on all scans at both systolic and diastolic phase by two independent readers (R1 with four years of experience and R2 with one year). Data were reported as median and interquartile range; agreement and differences were appraised with Bland-Altman analyses and Wilcoxon tests, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen patients, 11 females (79%) aged 44 (41–50) years, underwent cardiac MRI. For the first and second readings, respectively, EAT volume was 86 (78–95) cm(3) and 85 (79–91) cm(3) at systole and 82 (74–95) cm(3) and 81 (75–94) cm(3) at diastole for R1, and 89 (79–99) cm(3) and 93 (84–98) cm(3) at systole and 92 (85–103) cm(3) and 93 (82–94) cm(3) at diastole for R2. R1 had the best reproducibility at diastole (bias 0.3 cm(3), standard deviation of the differences (SD) 3.3 cm(3)). R2 had the worst reproducibility at diastole (bias 3.9 cm(3), SD 12.1 cm(3)). The only significant difference between systole and diastole was at the first reading by R1 (p = 0.016). The greatest bias was that of inter-reader reproducibility at diastole (-9.4 cm(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility was within clinically acceptable limits in most instances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9127004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91270042022-05-25 Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner Secchi, Francesco Asteria, Carmela Monti, Caterina B. Malavazos, Alexis Elias Capra, Davide Alì, Marco Giassi, Cecilia L. A. Francesconi, Simona Basilico, Sara Giovanelli, Alessandro Morricone, Lelio Sardanelli, Francesco Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the reproducibility of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume, measured on scans performed using an open-bore magnetic resonance scanner. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for bariatric surgery, aged between 18 and 65 years who agreed to undergo cardiac imaging (MRI), were prospectively enrolled. All those with cardiac pathology or contraindications to MRI were excluded. MRI was performed on a 1.0-T open-bore scanner, and EAT was segmented on all scans at both systolic and diastolic phase by two independent readers (R1 with four years of experience and R2 with one year). Data were reported as median and interquartile range; agreement and differences were appraised with Bland-Altman analyses and Wilcoxon tests, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen patients, 11 females (79%) aged 44 (41–50) years, underwent cardiac MRI. For the first and second readings, respectively, EAT volume was 86 (78–95) cm(3) and 85 (79–91) cm(3) at systole and 82 (74–95) cm(3) and 81 (75–94) cm(3) at diastole for R1, and 89 (79–99) cm(3) and 93 (84–98) cm(3) at systole and 92 (85–103) cm(3) and 93 (82–94) cm(3) at diastole for R2. R1 had the best reproducibility at diastole (bias 0.3 cm(3), standard deviation of the differences (SD) 3.3 cm(3)). R2 had the worst reproducibility at diastole (bias 3.9 cm(3), SD 12.1 cm(3)). The only significant difference between systole and diastole was at the first reading by R1 (p = 0.016). The greatest bias was that of inter-reader reproducibility at diastole (-9.4 cm(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility was within clinically acceptable limits in most instances. Springer Vienna 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9127004/ /pubmed/35606555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00274-0 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Secchi, Francesco
Asteria, Carmela
Monti, Caterina B.
Malavazos, Alexis Elias
Capra, Davide
Alì, Marco
Giassi, Cecilia L. A.
Francesconi, Simona
Basilico, Sara
Giovanelli, Alessandro
Morricone, Lelio
Sardanelli, Francesco
Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner
title Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner
title_full Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner
title_fullStr Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner
title_short Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner
title_sort quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore mr scanner
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00274-0
work_keys_str_mv AT secchifrancesco quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT asteriacarmela quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT monticaterinab quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT malavazosalexiselias quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT capradavide quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT alimarco quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT giassiceciliala quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT francesconisimona quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT basilicosara quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT giovanellialessandro quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT morriconelelio quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner
AT sardanellifrancesco quantificationofepicardialadiposetissueinobesepatientsusinganopenboremrscanner