Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation
BACKGROUND: The insights gleaned from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have implications across the healthcare ecosystem, from clinical investigations to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical devices to clinical care and reimbursement decisions. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FD...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00463-w |
_version_ | 1784712359209598976 |
---|---|
author | Webber, Christina M. Caldwell, Brittany Bocell, Fraser D. Saha, Anindita Tarver, Michelle E. |
author_facet | Webber, Christina M. Caldwell, Brittany Bocell, Fraser D. Saha, Anindita Tarver, Michelle E. |
author_sort | Webber, Christina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The insights gleaned from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have implications across the healthcare ecosystem, from clinical investigations to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical devices to clinical care and reimbursement decisions. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) hosted a public meeting in September 2020 discussing how PROs can be used in medical device evaluation throughout the total product life cycle, as well as methods for developing and modifying PRO instruments to ensure they are fit-for-purpose. This commentary presents key points of discussion from the meeting, providing insight into the increased interest in PRO data to support medical product development while also exploring future opportunities of incorporating PRO data throughout healthcare. MAIN BODY. Thoughtful use of fit-for-purpose PRO instruments to integrate the patient’s voice into clinical care paradigms, medical device development, regulatory decisions, and reimbursement and coverage decisions were emphasized throughout the meeting. Existing PRO instruments may be used if the context of use is appropriate. Modifications to an existing PRO instrument may also be explored to ensure the instrument is fit-for-purpose in a new context of use. Development of a novel PRO instrument may be necessary to capture attributes in a new patient population or application. Multi-stakeholder collaborations, of which patients are a key component, create efficiencies in the development and modification of PRO instruments. CONCLUSION: Continued multi-stakeholder collaborations bringing together researchers, clinicians, patients, regulators, and payers are critical to further advance the inclusion of the patient voice incorporating PRO instruments throughout the healthcare ecosystem in an efficient manner that is least burdensome to patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9127472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91274722022-05-24 Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation Webber, Christina M. Caldwell, Brittany Bocell, Fraser D. Saha, Anindita Tarver, Michelle E. J Patient Rep Outcomes Commentary BACKGROUND: The insights gleaned from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have implications across the healthcare ecosystem, from clinical investigations to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical devices to clinical care and reimbursement decisions. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) hosted a public meeting in September 2020 discussing how PROs can be used in medical device evaluation throughout the total product life cycle, as well as methods for developing and modifying PRO instruments to ensure they are fit-for-purpose. This commentary presents key points of discussion from the meeting, providing insight into the increased interest in PRO data to support medical product development while also exploring future opportunities of incorporating PRO data throughout healthcare. MAIN BODY. Thoughtful use of fit-for-purpose PRO instruments to integrate the patient’s voice into clinical care paradigms, medical device development, regulatory decisions, and reimbursement and coverage decisions were emphasized throughout the meeting. Existing PRO instruments may be used if the context of use is appropriate. Modifications to an existing PRO instrument may also be explored to ensure the instrument is fit-for-purpose in a new context of use. Development of a novel PRO instrument may be necessary to capture attributes in a new patient population or application. Multi-stakeholder collaborations, of which patients are a key component, create efficiencies in the development and modification of PRO instruments. CONCLUSION: Continued multi-stakeholder collaborations bringing together researchers, clinicians, patients, regulators, and payers are critical to further advance the inclusion of the patient voice incorporating PRO instruments throughout the healthcare ecosystem in an efficient manner that is least burdensome to patients. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9127472/ /pubmed/35608682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00463-w Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Commentary Webber, Christina M. Caldwell, Brittany Bocell, Fraser D. Saha, Anindita Tarver, Michelle E. Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
title | Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
title_full | Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
title_short | Patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes and medical device evaluation: from conception to implementation |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00463-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webberchristinam patientreportedoutcomesandmedicaldeviceevaluationfromconceptiontoimplementation AT caldwellbrittany patientreportedoutcomesandmedicaldeviceevaluationfromconceptiontoimplementation AT bocellfraserd patientreportedoutcomesandmedicaldeviceevaluationfromconceptiontoimplementation AT sahaanindita patientreportedoutcomesandmedicaldeviceevaluationfromconceptiontoimplementation AT tarvermichellee patientreportedoutcomesandmedicaldeviceevaluationfromconceptiontoimplementation |