Cargando…
Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes. METHODS: We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.04.002 |
_version_ | 1784712372970061824 |
---|---|
author | Györfi, Orsolya Ip, Cheng-Teng Justesen, Anders Bach Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise Rømer, Connie Fabricius, Martin Pinborg, Lars H. Beniczky, Sándor |
author_facet | Györfi, Orsolya Ip, Cheng-Teng Justesen, Anders Bach Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise Rømer, Connie Fabricius, Martin Pinborg, Lars H. Beniczky, Sándor |
author_sort | Györfi, Orsolya |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes. METHODS: We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electrode coordinates were co-registered with the MRI of the patients, and mean distance error relative to the three-dimensional MRI reconstruction was determined for each patient. We included 60 patients: 30 were measured using the photogrammetry method, and 30 age and gender matched patients were measured with the optical scanner. RESULTS: Using the optical scanner, the mean distance error was 1.78 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.59–1.98 mm) which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared with the photogrammetry method (mean distance error: 2.43 mm; 95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.57 mm). The real-time scanning took 5–10 min per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The handheld optical scanner is more accurate and feasible, compared to the photogrammetry method. SIGNIFICANCE: Measuring EEG electrode positions in high-density array, using the optical scanner is suitable for clinical implementation in EEG source imaging for presurgical evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9127528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91275282022-05-25 Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method Györfi, Orsolya Ip, Cheng-Teng Justesen, Anders Bach Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise Rømer, Connie Fabricius, Martin Pinborg, Lars H. Beniczky, Sándor Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes. METHODS: We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electrode coordinates were co-registered with the MRI of the patients, and mean distance error relative to the three-dimensional MRI reconstruction was determined for each patient. We included 60 patients: 30 were measured using the photogrammetry method, and 30 age and gender matched patients were measured with the optical scanner. RESULTS: Using the optical scanner, the mean distance error was 1.78 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.59–1.98 mm) which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared with the photogrammetry method (mean distance error: 2.43 mm; 95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.57 mm). The real-time scanning took 5–10 min per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The handheld optical scanner is more accurate and feasible, compared to the photogrammetry method. SIGNIFICANCE: Measuring EEG electrode positions in high-density array, using the optical scanner is suitable for clinical implementation in EEG source imaging for presurgical evaluation. Elsevier 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9127528/ /pubmed/35620351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.04.002 Text en © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Györfi, Orsolya Ip, Cheng-Teng Justesen, Anders Bach Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise Rømer, Connie Fabricius, Martin Pinborg, Lars H. Beniczky, Sándor Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
title | Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
title_full | Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
title_short | Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
title_sort | accuracy of high-density eeg electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.04.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gyorfiorsolya accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT ipchengteng accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT justesenandersbach accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT gamjensenmarialouise accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT rømerconnie accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT fabriciusmartin accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT pinborglarsh accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod AT beniczkysandor accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod |