Cargando…

Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes. METHODS: We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Györfi, Orsolya, Ip, Cheng-Teng, Justesen, Anders Bach, Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise, Rømer, Connie, Fabricius, Martin, Pinborg, Lars H., Beniczky, Sándor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.04.002
_version_ 1784712372970061824
author Györfi, Orsolya
Ip, Cheng-Teng
Justesen, Anders Bach
Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise
Rømer, Connie
Fabricius, Martin
Pinborg, Lars H.
Beniczky, Sándor
author_facet Györfi, Orsolya
Ip, Cheng-Teng
Justesen, Anders Bach
Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise
Rømer, Connie
Fabricius, Martin
Pinborg, Lars H.
Beniczky, Sándor
author_sort Györfi, Orsolya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes. METHODS: We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electrode coordinates were co-registered with the MRI of the patients, and mean distance error relative to the three-dimensional MRI reconstruction was determined for each patient. We included 60 patients: 30 were measured using the photogrammetry method, and 30 age and gender matched patients were measured with the optical scanner. RESULTS: Using the optical scanner, the mean distance error was 1.78 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.59–1.98 mm) which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared with the photogrammetry method (mean distance error: 2.43 mm; 95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.57 mm). The real-time scanning took 5–10 min per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The handheld optical scanner is more accurate and feasible, compared to the photogrammetry method. SIGNIFICANCE: Measuring EEG electrode positions in high-density array, using the optical scanner is suitable for clinical implementation in EEG source imaging for presurgical evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9127528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91275282022-05-25 Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method Györfi, Orsolya Ip, Cheng-Teng Justesen, Anders Bach Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise Rømer, Connie Fabricius, Martin Pinborg, Lars H. Beniczky, Sándor Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes. METHODS: We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electrode coordinates were co-registered with the MRI of the patients, and mean distance error relative to the three-dimensional MRI reconstruction was determined for each patient. We included 60 patients: 30 were measured using the photogrammetry method, and 30 age and gender matched patients were measured with the optical scanner. RESULTS: Using the optical scanner, the mean distance error was 1.78 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.59–1.98 mm) which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared with the photogrammetry method (mean distance error: 2.43 mm; 95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.57 mm). The real-time scanning took 5–10 min per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The handheld optical scanner is more accurate and feasible, compared to the photogrammetry method. SIGNIFICANCE: Measuring EEG electrode positions in high-density array, using the optical scanner is suitable for clinical implementation in EEG source imaging for presurgical evaluation. Elsevier 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9127528/ /pubmed/35620351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.04.002 Text en © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Györfi, Orsolya
Ip, Cheng-Teng
Justesen, Anders Bach
Gam-Jensen, Maria Louise
Rømer, Connie
Fabricius, Martin
Pinborg, Lars H.
Beniczky, Sándor
Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
title Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
title_full Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
title_fullStr Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
title_short Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
title_sort accuracy of high-density eeg electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT gyorfiorsolya accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT ipchengteng accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT justesenandersbach accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT gamjensenmarialouise accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT rømerconnie accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT fabriciusmartin accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT pinborglarsh accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod
AT beniczkysandor accuracyofhighdensityeegelectrodepositionmeasurementusinganopticalscannercomparedwiththephotogrammetrymethod