Cargando…

αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes

Formation of transcription factor (TF)–coregulator complexes is a key step in transcriptional regulation, with coregulators having essential functions as hub nodes in molecular networks. How specificity and selectivity are maintained in these nodes remain open questions. In this work, we addressed s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friis Theisen, Frederik, Salladini, Edoardo, Davidsen, Rikke, Jo Rasmussen, Christina, Staby, Lasse, Kragelund, Birthe B., Skriver, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35452682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101963
_version_ 1784712386183168000
author Friis Theisen, Frederik
Salladini, Edoardo
Davidsen, Rikke
Jo Rasmussen, Christina
Staby, Lasse
Kragelund, Birthe B.
Skriver, Karen
author_facet Friis Theisen, Frederik
Salladini, Edoardo
Davidsen, Rikke
Jo Rasmussen, Christina
Staby, Lasse
Kragelund, Birthe B.
Skriver, Karen
author_sort Friis Theisen, Frederik
collection PubMed
description Formation of transcription factor (TF)–coregulator complexes is a key step in transcriptional regulation, with coregulators having essential functions as hub nodes in molecular networks. How specificity and selectivity are maintained in these nodes remain open questions. In this work, we addressed specificity in transcriptional networks using complexes formed between TFs and αα-hubs, which are defined by a common αα-hairpin secondary structure motif, as a model. Using NMR spectroscopy and binding thermodynamics, we analyzed the structure, dynamics, stability, and ligand-binding properties of the Arabidopsis thaliana RST domains from TAF4 and known binding partner RCD1, and the TAFH domain from human TAF4, allowing comparison across species, functions, and architectural contexts. While these αα-hubs shared the αα-hairpin motif, they differed in length and orientation of accessory helices as well as in their thermodynamic profiles of ligand binding. Whereas biologically relevant RCD1–ligand pairs displayed high affinity driven by enthalpy, TAF4–ligand interactions were entropy driven and exhibited less binding-induced structuring. We in addition identified a thermal unfolding state with a structured core for all three domains, although the temperature sensitivity differed. Thermal stability studies suggested that initial unfolding of the RCD1–RST domain localized around helix 1, lending this region structural malleability, while effects in TAF4–RST were more stochastic, suggesting variability in structural adaptability upon binding. Collectively, our results support a model in which hub structure, flexibility, and binding thermodynamics contribute to αα-hub–TF binding specificity, a finding of general relevance to the understanding of coregulator–ligand interactions and interactome sizes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9127584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91275842022-05-25 αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes Friis Theisen, Frederik Salladini, Edoardo Davidsen, Rikke Jo Rasmussen, Christina Staby, Lasse Kragelund, Birthe B. Skriver, Karen J Biol Chem Research Article Formation of transcription factor (TF)–coregulator complexes is a key step in transcriptional regulation, with coregulators having essential functions as hub nodes in molecular networks. How specificity and selectivity are maintained in these nodes remain open questions. In this work, we addressed specificity in transcriptional networks using complexes formed between TFs and αα-hubs, which are defined by a common αα-hairpin secondary structure motif, as a model. Using NMR spectroscopy and binding thermodynamics, we analyzed the structure, dynamics, stability, and ligand-binding properties of the Arabidopsis thaliana RST domains from TAF4 and known binding partner RCD1, and the TAFH domain from human TAF4, allowing comparison across species, functions, and architectural contexts. While these αα-hubs shared the αα-hairpin motif, they differed in length and orientation of accessory helices as well as in their thermodynamic profiles of ligand binding. Whereas biologically relevant RCD1–ligand pairs displayed high affinity driven by enthalpy, TAF4–ligand interactions were entropy driven and exhibited less binding-induced structuring. We in addition identified a thermal unfolding state with a structured core for all three domains, although the temperature sensitivity differed. Thermal stability studies suggested that initial unfolding of the RCD1–RST domain localized around helix 1, lending this region structural malleability, while effects in TAF4–RST were more stochastic, suggesting variability in structural adaptability upon binding. Collectively, our results support a model in which hub structure, flexibility, and binding thermodynamics contribute to αα-hub–TF binding specificity, a finding of general relevance to the understanding of coregulator–ligand interactions and interactome sizes. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9127584/ /pubmed/35452682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101963 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Friis Theisen, Frederik
Salladini, Edoardo
Davidsen, Rikke
Jo Rasmussen, Christina
Staby, Lasse
Kragelund, Birthe B.
Skriver, Karen
αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
title αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
title_full αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
title_fullStr αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
title_full_unstemmed αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
title_short αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
title_sort αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35452682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101963
work_keys_str_mv AT friistheisenfrederik aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes
AT salladiniedoardo aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes
AT davidsenrikke aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes
AT jorasmussenchristina aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes
AT stabylasse aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes
AT kragelundbirtheb aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes
AT skriverkaren aahubcoregulatorstructureandflexibilitydeterminetranscriptionfactorbindingandselectioninregulatoryinteractomes