Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence

Recent years have seen impressive advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and this has stoked renewed concern about the impact of technological progress on the labor market, including on worker displacement. This paper looks at the possible links between AI and employment in a cross-country context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Georgieff, Alexandre, Hyee, Raphaela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.832736
_version_ 1784712465749114880
author Georgieff, Alexandre
Hyee, Raphaela
author_facet Georgieff, Alexandre
Hyee, Raphaela
author_sort Georgieff, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description Recent years have seen impressive advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and this has stoked renewed concern about the impact of technological progress on the labor market, including on worker displacement. This paper looks at the possible links between AI and employment in a cross-country context. It adapts the AI occupational impact measure developed by Felten, Raj and Seamans—an indicator measuring the degree to which occupations rely on abilities in which AI has made the most progress—and extends it to 23 OECD countries. Overall, there appears to be no clear relationship between AI exposure and employment growth. However, in occupations where computer use is high, greater exposure to AI is linked to higher employment growth. The paper also finds suggestive evidence of a negative relationship between AI exposure and growth in average hours worked among occupations where computer use is low. One possible explanation is that partial automation by AI increases productivity directly as well as by shifting the task composition of occupations toward higher value-added tasks. This increase in labor productivity and output counteracts the direct displacement effect of automation through AI for workers with good digital skills, who may find it easier to use AI effectively and shift to non-automatable, higher-value added tasks within their occupations. The opposite could be true for workers with poor digital skills, who may not be able to interact efficiently with AI and thus reap all potential benefits of the technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9127971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91279712022-05-25 Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence Georgieff, Alexandre Hyee, Raphaela Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Recent years have seen impressive advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and this has stoked renewed concern about the impact of technological progress on the labor market, including on worker displacement. This paper looks at the possible links between AI and employment in a cross-country context. It adapts the AI occupational impact measure developed by Felten, Raj and Seamans—an indicator measuring the degree to which occupations rely on abilities in which AI has made the most progress—and extends it to 23 OECD countries. Overall, there appears to be no clear relationship between AI exposure and employment growth. However, in occupations where computer use is high, greater exposure to AI is linked to higher employment growth. The paper also finds suggestive evidence of a negative relationship between AI exposure and growth in average hours worked among occupations where computer use is low. One possible explanation is that partial automation by AI increases productivity directly as well as by shifting the task composition of occupations toward higher value-added tasks. This increase in labor productivity and output counteracts the direct displacement effect of automation through AI for workers with good digital skills, who may find it easier to use AI effectively and shift to non-automatable, higher-value added tasks within their occupations. The opposite could be true for workers with poor digital skills, who may not be able to interact efficiently with AI and thus reap all potential benefits of the technology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9127971/ /pubmed/35620279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.832736 Text en Copyright © 2022 Georgieff and Hyee. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Georgieff, Alexandre
Hyee, Raphaela
Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence
title Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence
title_full Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence
title_short Artificial Intelligence and Employment: New Cross-Country Evidence
title_sort artificial intelligence and employment: new cross-country evidence
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9127971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.832736
work_keys_str_mv AT georgieffalexandre artificialintelligenceandemploymentnewcrosscountryevidence
AT hyeeraphaela artificialintelligenceandemploymentnewcrosscountryevidence