Cargando…

Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy

The earliest recorded efforts to biopsy prostate, in the early 20th century, were made through transperineal (TP) approach, with open perineal prostate biopsy (PBx) being considered the gold standard for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in that era. Later, to minimize morbidity and increase diagnosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmeusser, Benjamin, Levin, Brandon, Lama, Daniel, Sidana, Abhinav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221100590
_version_ 1784712482107949056
author Schmeusser, Benjamin
Levin, Brandon
Lama, Daniel
Sidana, Abhinav
author_facet Schmeusser, Benjamin
Levin, Brandon
Lama, Daniel
Sidana, Abhinav
author_sort Schmeusser, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description The earliest recorded efforts to biopsy prostate, in the early 20th century, were made through transperineal (TP) approach, with open perineal prostate biopsy (PBx) being considered the gold standard for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in that era. Later, to minimize morbidity and increase diagnostic accuracy, several technical modifications and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) assistance were incorporated. However, in the 1980s, the transrectal (TR) approach became the predominant PBx method following the introduction of TRUS-TR PBx with sextant sampling, providing a convenient and efficacious method for prostate sampling. With modernization of PCa diagnosis, a recent resurgence of the TP PBx has been observed, driven primarily by TR drawbacks of infectious complications and sampling limitations. TP PBx is rapidly emerging as the new PBx standard, being officially recommended as the initial approach for biopsy in Europe and is increasingly being conducted and studied in the United States. The modern era of TP PBx is based on the improvements in local anesthesia techniques, TP access systems, and robotic assistance. These modifications and advancements have improved the ease of use, patient comfort, and diagnostic outcomes with TP PBx. Herein, we present a history of the evolution of TP PBx spanning over 100 years and explore the basis of the technique that merits future utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9128053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91280532022-05-25 Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy Schmeusser, Benjamin Levin, Brandon Lama, Daniel Sidana, Abhinav Ther Adv Urol Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence? The earliest recorded efforts to biopsy prostate, in the early 20th century, were made through transperineal (TP) approach, with open perineal prostate biopsy (PBx) being considered the gold standard for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in that era. Later, to minimize morbidity and increase diagnostic accuracy, several technical modifications and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) assistance were incorporated. However, in the 1980s, the transrectal (TR) approach became the predominant PBx method following the introduction of TRUS-TR PBx with sextant sampling, providing a convenient and efficacious method for prostate sampling. With modernization of PCa diagnosis, a recent resurgence of the TP PBx has been observed, driven primarily by TR drawbacks of infectious complications and sampling limitations. TP PBx is rapidly emerging as the new PBx standard, being officially recommended as the initial approach for biopsy in Europe and is increasingly being conducted and studied in the United States. The modern era of TP PBx is based on the improvements in local anesthesia techniques, TP access systems, and robotic assistance. These modifications and advancements have improved the ease of use, patient comfort, and diagnostic outcomes with TP PBx. Herein, we present a history of the evolution of TP PBx spanning over 100 years and explore the basis of the technique that merits future utilization. SAGE Publications 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9128053/ /pubmed/35620643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221100590 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
Schmeusser, Benjamin
Levin, Brandon
Lama, Daniel
Sidana, Abhinav
Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
title Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
title_full Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
title_short Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
title_sort hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy
topic Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221100590
work_keys_str_mv AT schmeusserbenjamin hundredyearsoftransperinealprostatebiopsy
AT levinbrandon hundredyearsoftransperinealprostatebiopsy
AT lamadaniel hundredyearsoftransperinealprostatebiopsy
AT sidanaabhinav hundredyearsoftransperinealprostatebiopsy