Cargando…

Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND: Despite continuous developments and advances in the perioperative management of patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality remain high and strongly depend on the preoperative clinical status. The associated postoper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugiyama, Kayo, Watanuki, Hirotaka, Tochii, Masato, Futamura, Yasuhiro, Kitagawa, Yuka, Makino, Satoshi, Ohashi, Wataru, Matsuyama, Katsuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01858-y
_version_ 1784712488751726592
author Sugiyama, Kayo
Watanuki, Hirotaka
Tochii, Masato
Futamura, Yasuhiro
Kitagawa, Yuka
Makino, Satoshi
Ohashi, Wataru
Matsuyama, Katsuhiko
author_facet Sugiyama, Kayo
Watanuki, Hirotaka
Tochii, Masato
Futamura, Yasuhiro
Kitagawa, Yuka
Makino, Satoshi
Ohashi, Wataru
Matsuyama, Katsuhiko
author_sort Sugiyama, Kayo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite continuous developments and advances in the perioperative management of patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality remain high and strongly depend on the preoperative clinical status. The associated postoperative mortality is still hard to predict prior to the surgical procedure. The so-called German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score uses very basic and easily retrievable parameters and was specifically designed for predicting the 30-day mortality rate in patients undergoing surgery for AADA. This study evaluated impact of the GERAADA score in the authors’ institutional results. METHODS: Among 101 acute type A aortic dissection patients treated at our hospital during August 2015–March 2021, the GERAADA was calculated individually and retrospectively. Predicted and actual mortalities were assessed, and independent predicted factors were searched. The primary endpoint was defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and early mortality, and the secondary endpoints were defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and other postoperative results, and comparison of preoperative factors and postoperative results regardless to GERAADA scores. RESULTS: While the overall 30-day mortality for the entire study cohort calculated by the GERAADA score was 14.3 (8.1–77.6)%, the actual mortality rate was 6%. However, the GERAADA score was significantly high in some postoperative complications and showed significant correlation with some peri- and post-operative factors. In addition, factors not belonging to GERAADA score such as time from onset to arrival at the hospital, time from onset to arrival at the operation room, spouse presence, and hemodialysis were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the actual mortality was lower than predicted, GERAADA score may impact on the postoperative course. In addition, it would be desirable to add parameters such as the time from onset to arrival, family background, and hemodialysis for further accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9128089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91280892022-05-25 Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection Sugiyama, Kayo Watanuki, Hirotaka Tochii, Masato Futamura, Yasuhiro Kitagawa, Yuka Makino, Satoshi Ohashi, Wataru Matsuyama, Katsuhiko J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite continuous developments and advances in the perioperative management of patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality remain high and strongly depend on the preoperative clinical status. The associated postoperative mortality is still hard to predict prior to the surgical procedure. The so-called German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score uses very basic and easily retrievable parameters and was specifically designed for predicting the 30-day mortality rate in patients undergoing surgery for AADA. This study evaluated impact of the GERAADA score in the authors’ institutional results. METHODS: Among 101 acute type A aortic dissection patients treated at our hospital during August 2015–March 2021, the GERAADA was calculated individually and retrospectively. Predicted and actual mortalities were assessed, and independent predicted factors were searched. The primary endpoint was defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and early mortality, and the secondary endpoints were defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and other postoperative results, and comparison of preoperative factors and postoperative results regardless to GERAADA scores. RESULTS: While the overall 30-day mortality for the entire study cohort calculated by the GERAADA score was 14.3 (8.1–77.6)%, the actual mortality rate was 6%. However, the GERAADA score was significantly high in some postoperative complications and showed significant correlation with some peri- and post-operative factors. In addition, factors not belonging to GERAADA score such as time from onset to arrival at the hospital, time from onset to arrival at the operation room, spouse presence, and hemodialysis were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the actual mortality was lower than predicted, GERAADA score may impact on the postoperative course. In addition, it would be desirable to add parameters such as the time from onset to arrival, family background, and hemodialysis for further accuracy. BioMed Central 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9128089/ /pubmed/35606857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01858-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sugiyama, Kayo
Watanuki, Hirotaka
Tochii, Masato
Futamura, Yasuhiro
Kitagawa, Yuka
Makino, Satoshi
Ohashi, Wataru
Matsuyama, Katsuhiko
Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
title Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
title_full Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
title_fullStr Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
title_full_unstemmed Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
title_short Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
title_sort impact of geraada score in patients with acute type a aortic dissection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01858-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sugiyamakayo impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT watanukihirotaka impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT tochiimasato impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT futamurayasuhiro impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT kitagawayuka impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT makinosatoshi impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT ohashiwataru impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection
AT matsuyamakatsuhiko impactofgeraadascoreinpatientswithacutetypeaaorticdissection