Cargando…

Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inferior vena cava (IVC) examination has been reported as a noninvasive method for evaluating the hemodynamic state. We conducted this crossover pilot study to investigate the effects of the administration of water and high-carbohydrate-containing fluids on the hemodynamic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Shuhua, Ling, Qiong, Liang, Fengping, Lin, Zhongmei, Deng, Yingqing, Huang, Shaonong, Zhu, Qianqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01697-3
_version_ 1784712523944034304
author Zhao, Shuhua
Ling, Qiong
Liang, Fengping
Lin, Zhongmei
Deng, Yingqing
Huang, Shaonong
Zhu, Qianqian
author_facet Zhao, Shuhua
Ling, Qiong
Liang, Fengping
Lin, Zhongmei
Deng, Yingqing
Huang, Shaonong
Zhu, Qianqian
author_sort Zhao, Shuhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inferior vena cava (IVC) examination has been reported as a noninvasive method for evaluating the hemodynamic state. We conducted this crossover pilot study to investigate the effects of the administration of water and high-carbohydrate-containing fluids on the hemodynamic status of volunteers through collapsibility index of IVC (IVCCI) measurement. METHODS: Twenty volunteers were randomly assigned to a water or high-carbohydrate group according to computer-generated random numbers in a 1:1 ratio. In the water group, volunteers received water (5 mL/kg), and in the high-carbohydrate group, patients received carbohydrate drinks (5 mL/kg). Respiratory variations in the IVC diameter, gastric volume, and blood pressure and heart rates in erect and supine positions were measured at admission (T1), 1 h (T2), 2 h (T3), 3 h (T4), and 4 h (T5). RESULTS: When considering participants with an IVCCI of more than 42%, there were no significant differences between the water and carbohydrate drink groups at each time point (all p > 0.05). At T2, more participants had an empty stomach in water group than in carbohydrate drink group (p < 0.001). At T3, 30% of the participants could not empty their stomachs in carbohydrate drink group. However, with regard to the number of volunteers with empty stomach at T3, there was no significant difference between water and carbohydrate drink group. Repeated measures data analysis demonstrated that IVCCI showed no significant differences over time (p = 0.063 for T1-T5). There were no differences between water and carbohydrate drinks (p = 0.867). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that neither water nor carbohydrate drinking affected the hemodynamic status through IVCCI measurement over time, up to 4 h after drinking. Furthermore, carbohydrate drinking might delay gastric emptying at 1 h, but not 2 h after drinking, in comparison with water. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01697-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9128243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91282432022-05-25 Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study Zhao, Shuhua Ling, Qiong Liang, Fengping Lin, Zhongmei Deng, Yingqing Huang, Shaonong Zhu, Qianqian BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inferior vena cava (IVC) examination has been reported as a noninvasive method for evaluating the hemodynamic state. We conducted this crossover pilot study to investigate the effects of the administration of water and high-carbohydrate-containing fluids on the hemodynamic status of volunteers through collapsibility index of IVC (IVCCI) measurement. METHODS: Twenty volunteers were randomly assigned to a water or high-carbohydrate group according to computer-generated random numbers in a 1:1 ratio. In the water group, volunteers received water (5 mL/kg), and in the high-carbohydrate group, patients received carbohydrate drinks (5 mL/kg). Respiratory variations in the IVC diameter, gastric volume, and blood pressure and heart rates in erect and supine positions were measured at admission (T1), 1 h (T2), 2 h (T3), 3 h (T4), and 4 h (T5). RESULTS: When considering participants with an IVCCI of more than 42%, there were no significant differences between the water and carbohydrate drink groups at each time point (all p > 0.05). At T2, more participants had an empty stomach in water group than in carbohydrate drink group (p < 0.001). At T3, 30% of the participants could not empty their stomachs in carbohydrate drink group. However, with regard to the number of volunteers with empty stomach at T3, there was no significant difference between water and carbohydrate drink group. Repeated measures data analysis demonstrated that IVCCI showed no significant differences over time (p = 0.063 for T1-T5). There were no differences between water and carbohydrate drinks (p = 0.867). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that neither water nor carbohydrate drinking affected the hemodynamic status through IVCCI measurement over time, up to 4 h after drinking. Furthermore, carbohydrate drinking might delay gastric emptying at 1 h, but not 2 h after drinking, in comparison with water. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01697-3. BioMed Central 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9128243/ /pubmed/35610575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01697-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Shuhua
Ling, Qiong
Liang, Fengping
Lin, Zhongmei
Deng, Yingqing
Huang, Shaonong
Zhu, Qianqian
Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
title Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
title_full Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
title_fullStr Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
title_short Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
title_sort different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01697-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoshuhua differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy
AT lingqiong differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy
AT liangfengping differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy
AT linzhongmei differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy
AT dengyingqing differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy
AT huangshaonong differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy
AT zhuqianqian differentpreoperativefluidsdonotaffectthehemodynamicstatusbutgastricvolumeresultsofarandomizedcrossoverpilotstudy