Cargando…

Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia

BACKGROUND: Abdominal trauma is one of the leading causes of death. In Colombia, few studies have evaluated the results on related factors and outcomes when comparing laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez, Efrain J. I., Vargas, Luis F. C., Lozada‐Martinez, Ivan D., Reyes, Mariana, Pedraza, Mauricio, Forero, Nicolas, Guardo‐Carmona, Daniela, Narvaez‐Rojas, Alexis R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.640
_version_ 1784712552496758784
author Gómez, Efrain J. I.
Vargas, Luis F. C.
Lozada‐Martinez, Ivan D.
Reyes, Mariana
Pedraza, Mauricio
Forero, Nicolas
Guardo‐Carmona, Daniela
Narvaez‐Rojas, Alexis R.
author_facet Gómez, Efrain J. I.
Vargas, Luis F. C.
Lozada‐Martinez, Ivan D.
Reyes, Mariana
Pedraza, Mauricio
Forero, Nicolas
Guardo‐Carmona, Daniela
Narvaez‐Rojas, Alexis R.
author_sort Gómez, Efrain J. I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominal trauma is one of the leading causes of death. In Colombia, few studies have evaluated the results on related factors and outcomes when comparing laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma in a limited resources environment in a middle‐income country. METHODS: Retrospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in Bogota, Colombia from January 2018 to October 2020. Patients over 18 years old, hemodynamically stable with penetrating abdominal trauma without other body parts injuries, that underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy surgical exploration and treatment were included. Frequencies, percentages, correlations, and odds ratio were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were analyzed (26 laparoscopy vs. 26 laparotomy). Stabbing injuries were more frequent in both groups (76.9%), as well as involvement of the anterior abdomen. None missed enterotomies were reported in the laparoscopy group. Surgical time and bleeding were significantly lower in the laparoscopic approach group (63 vs. 115 min and 65 vs. 992 cc, respectively). The time to oral intake and length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic management group (2 vs. 3 days and 1 vs. 4 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical results found a safe scenario in a limited resources environment for the application of the laparoscopic technique to approach penetrating abdominal trauma in stable patients without missed injuries, low threshold of conversion to open approach, and additionally not presenting a higher percentage of complications compared with the laparotomy group in Colombia. Operative time, oral intake, and length of hospital stay were lower in the fully therapeutic laparoscopy group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9128394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91283942022-05-25 Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia Gómez, Efrain J. I. Vargas, Luis F. C. Lozada‐Martinez, Ivan D. Reyes, Mariana Pedraza, Mauricio Forero, Nicolas Guardo‐Carmona, Daniela Narvaez‐Rojas, Alexis R. Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Abdominal trauma is one of the leading causes of death. In Colombia, few studies have evaluated the results on related factors and outcomes when comparing laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma in a limited resources environment in a middle‐income country. METHODS: Retrospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in Bogota, Colombia from January 2018 to October 2020. Patients over 18 years old, hemodynamically stable with penetrating abdominal trauma without other body parts injuries, that underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy surgical exploration and treatment were included. Frequencies, percentages, correlations, and odds ratio were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were analyzed (26 laparoscopy vs. 26 laparotomy). Stabbing injuries were more frequent in both groups (76.9%), as well as involvement of the anterior abdomen. None missed enterotomies were reported in the laparoscopy group. Surgical time and bleeding were significantly lower in the laparoscopic approach group (63 vs. 115 min and 65 vs. 992 cc, respectively). The time to oral intake and length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic management group (2 vs. 3 days and 1 vs. 4 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical results found a safe scenario in a limited resources environment for the application of the laparoscopic technique to approach penetrating abdominal trauma in stable patients without missed injuries, low threshold of conversion to open approach, and additionally not presenting a higher percentage of complications compared with the laparotomy group in Colombia. Operative time, oral intake, and length of hospital stay were lower in the fully therapeutic laparoscopy group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9128394/ /pubmed/35620533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.640 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gómez, Efrain J. I.
Vargas, Luis F. C.
Lozada‐Martinez, Ivan D.
Reyes, Mariana
Pedraza, Mauricio
Forero, Nicolas
Guardo‐Carmona, Daniela
Narvaez‐Rojas, Alexis R.
Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia
title Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia
title_full Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia
title_fullStr Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia
title_short Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia
title_sort laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: a retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in colombia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.640
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezefrainji laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT vargasluisfc laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT lozadamartinezivand laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT reyesmariana laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT pedrazamauricio laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT foreronicolas laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT guardocarmonadaniela laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia
AT narvaezrojasalexisr laparoscopyhasbetterperformancethanlaparotomyinthetreatmentofstablepenetratingabdominaltraumaaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyinatraumareferralhospitalincolombia