Cargando…
Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines
Holobiont bacterial community assembly processes are an essential element to understanding the plant microbiome. To elucidate these processes, leaf, root, and rhizosphere samples were collected from eight lines of Brassica napus in Saskatchewan over the course of 10 weeks. We then used ecological nu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.00273-22 |
_version_ | 1784712573668556800 |
---|---|
author | Bell, Jennifer K. Mamet, Steven D. Helgason, Bobbi Siciliano, Steven D. |
author_facet | Bell, Jennifer K. Mamet, Steven D. Helgason, Bobbi Siciliano, Steven D. |
author_sort | Bell, Jennifer K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Holobiont bacterial community assembly processes are an essential element to understanding the plant microbiome. To elucidate these processes, leaf, root, and rhizosphere samples were collected from eight lines of Brassica napus in Saskatchewan over the course of 10 weeks. We then used ecological null modeling to disentangle the community assembly processes over the growing season in each plant part. The root was primarily dominated by stochastic community assembly processes, which is inconsistent with previous studies that suggest of a highly selective root environment. Leaf assembly processes were primarily stochastic as well. In contrast, the rhizosphere was a highly selective environment. The dominant rhizosphere selection process leads to more similar communities. Assembly processes in all plant compartments were dependent on plant growth stage with little line effect on community assembly. The foundations of assembly in the leaf were due to the harsh environment, leading to dominance of stochastic effects, whereas the stochastic effects in the root interior likely arise due to competitive exclusion or priority effects. Engineering canola microbiomes should occur during periods of strong selection assuming strong selection could promote beneficial bacteria. For example, engineering the microbiome to resist pathogens, which are typically aerially born, should focus on the flowering period, whereas microbiomes to enhance yield should likely be engineered postflowering as the rhizosphere is undergoing strong selection. IMPORTANCE In order to harness the microbiome for more sustainable crop production, we must first have a better understanding of microbial community assembly processes that occurring during plant development. This study examines the bacterial community assembly processes of the leaf, root, and rhizosphere of eight different lines of Brassica napus over the growing season. The influence of growth stage and B. napus line were examined in conjunction with the assembly processes. Understanding what influences the assembly processes of crops might allow for more targeted breeding efforts by working with the plant to manipulate the microbiome when it is undergoing the strongest selection pressure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9128504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91285042022-05-25 Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines Bell, Jennifer K. Mamet, Steven D. Helgason, Bobbi Siciliano, Steven D. Appl Environ Microbiol Environmental Microbiology Holobiont bacterial community assembly processes are an essential element to understanding the plant microbiome. To elucidate these processes, leaf, root, and rhizosphere samples were collected from eight lines of Brassica napus in Saskatchewan over the course of 10 weeks. We then used ecological null modeling to disentangle the community assembly processes over the growing season in each plant part. The root was primarily dominated by stochastic community assembly processes, which is inconsistent with previous studies that suggest of a highly selective root environment. Leaf assembly processes were primarily stochastic as well. In contrast, the rhizosphere was a highly selective environment. The dominant rhizosphere selection process leads to more similar communities. Assembly processes in all plant compartments were dependent on plant growth stage with little line effect on community assembly. The foundations of assembly in the leaf were due to the harsh environment, leading to dominance of stochastic effects, whereas the stochastic effects in the root interior likely arise due to competitive exclusion or priority effects. Engineering canola microbiomes should occur during periods of strong selection assuming strong selection could promote beneficial bacteria. For example, engineering the microbiome to resist pathogens, which are typically aerially born, should focus on the flowering period, whereas microbiomes to enhance yield should likely be engineered postflowering as the rhizosphere is undergoing strong selection. IMPORTANCE In order to harness the microbiome for more sustainable crop production, we must first have a better understanding of microbial community assembly processes that occurring during plant development. This study examines the bacterial community assembly processes of the leaf, root, and rhizosphere of eight different lines of Brassica napus over the growing season. The influence of growth stage and B. napus line were examined in conjunction with the assembly processes. Understanding what influences the assembly processes of crops might allow for more targeted breeding efforts by working with the plant to manipulate the microbiome when it is undergoing the strongest selection pressure. American Society for Microbiology 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9128504/ /pubmed/35481756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.00273-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Environmental Microbiology Bell, Jennifer K. Mamet, Steven D. Helgason, Bobbi Siciliano, Steven D. Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines |
title | Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines |
title_full | Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines |
title_fullStr | Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines |
title_full_unstemmed | Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines |
title_short | Brassica napus Bacterial Assembly Processes Vary with Plant Compartment and Growth Stage but Not between Lines |
title_sort | brassica napus bacterial assembly processes vary with plant compartment and growth stage but not between lines |
topic | Environmental Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.00273-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belljenniferk brassicanapusbacterialassemblyprocessesvarywithplantcompartmentandgrowthstagebutnotbetweenlines AT mametstevend brassicanapusbacterialassemblyprocessesvarywithplantcompartmentandgrowthstagebutnotbetweenlines AT helgasonbobbi brassicanapusbacterialassemblyprocessesvarywithplantcompartmentandgrowthstagebutnotbetweenlines AT sicilianostevend brassicanapusbacterialassemblyprocessesvarywithplantcompartmentandgrowthstagebutnotbetweenlines |