Cargando…

Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures

Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a better understandi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ta, Canhnghi N., Finley, Zachary, Medvedev, Gleb A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004352
_version_ 1784712620888031232
author Ta, Canhnghi N.
Finley, Zachary
Medvedev, Gleb A.
author_facet Ta, Canhnghi N.
Finley, Zachary
Medvedev, Gleb A.
author_sort Ta, Canhnghi N.
collection PubMed
description Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a better understanding of complications associated with nonoperative management will help guide the decision for operative intervention. METHODS: The PearlDiver patient records database was used to query for patients who sustained a hamate fracture using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Postinjury complications within 1 year of diagnosis were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for diagnoses of complications. RESULTS: A total of 1120 patients who sustained a hamate hook or body fracture met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients who were managed nonoperatively showed a nonunion rate of 2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0.2%. In a subanalysis using only ICD-10 codes to distinguish between hook and body fractures, hook fractures demonstrated a nonunion rate of 2.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 2.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%, while body fractures had a nonunion rate of 1.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%. CONCLUSION: The current study shows very low rates of nonunion, ulnar neuropathy and tendon rupture after nonoperative management of hamate fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9128796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91287962022-05-25 Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures Ta, Canhnghi N. Finley, Zachary Medvedev, Gleb A. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Hand Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a better understanding of complications associated with nonoperative management will help guide the decision for operative intervention. METHODS: The PearlDiver patient records database was used to query for patients who sustained a hamate fracture using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Postinjury complications within 1 year of diagnosis were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for diagnoses of complications. RESULTS: A total of 1120 patients who sustained a hamate hook or body fracture met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients who were managed nonoperatively showed a nonunion rate of 2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0.2%. In a subanalysis using only ICD-10 codes to distinguish between hook and body fractures, hook fractures demonstrated a nonunion rate of 2.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 2.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%, while body fractures had a nonunion rate of 1.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%. CONCLUSION: The current study shows very low rates of nonunion, ulnar neuropathy and tendon rupture after nonoperative management of hamate fractures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9128796/ /pubmed/35620503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004352 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Hand
Ta, Canhnghi N.
Finley, Zachary
Medvedev, Gleb A.
Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_full Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_fullStr Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_short Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_sort complications after nonoperative management of hamate fractures
topic Hand
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004352
work_keys_str_mv AT tacanhnghin complicationsafternonoperativemanagementofhamatefractures
AT finleyzachary complicationsafternonoperativemanagementofhamatefractures
AT medvedevgleba complicationsafternonoperativemanagementofhamatefractures