Cargando…

CT-MR Image Fusion for Post-Implant Dosimetry Analysis in Brain Tumor Seed Implantation- a Preliminary Study

PURPOSE: To calculate and evaluate postimplant dosimetry (PID) with CT-MR fusion technique after brain tumor brachytherapy and compare the result with CT-based PID. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 16 brain tumor patients received MR-guided intervention with Iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation entered this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Menglong, Chu, Cunkun, Huang, Liyin, Hu, Bijuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9129983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6310262
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To calculate and evaluate postimplant dosimetry (PID) with CT-MR fusion technique after brain tumor brachytherapy and compare the result with CT-based PID. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 16 brain tumor patients received MR-guided intervention with Iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation entered this preliminary study for PID evaluation. Registration and fusion of CT and MR images of the same patients were performed one day after operation. Seeds identification and targets delineation were carried out on CT, MR, and CT-MR fusion images, each. The number and location of seeds on MR or CT- MR fusion images were compared with those of actually implanted seeds. Clinical target volume (CTV) and dosimetric parameters such as %D90, %V100 and external V100 were measured and calculated. In addition, the correlation of the fusion to CT CTV ratio and other factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The numbers of fusion seeds were not significantly different compared with reference seeds (t =1.76, p >0.05). The difference between reference seeds numbers and truly extracted MR seeds numbers was statistically significant (t =3.91, p <0.05). All dosimetric parameters showed significant differences between the two techniques (p <0.05). The mean CTV delineated on fusion images was 34.3 ± 33.6, smaller than that on CT images. The mean values of external V100, %V100 and %D90 on fusion images were larger than those on CT images. Correlation analysis showed that the fusion-CT V100 ratio was positively and significantly correlated with the fusion-CT volume ratio. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study indicated that CT-MR fusion-based PID exhibited good accuracy for (125)I brain tumor brachytherapy dosimetry when compared to CT-based PID and merits further research to establish best-outcome protocols.