Cargando…

Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling

PURPOSE: To analyze the visual prognosis of macular buckling in patients with high myopia foveoschisis (FS) and to identify factors that predict the final visual outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively included 155 eyes of 155 patients who underwent foveoschisis-related macular buckling. Best-corrected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xiujuan, Wang, Yanbing, Chen, Yuqing, Tanumiharjo, Silvia, Wu, Yijin, Lian, Ping, Chen, Shida, Huang, Xia, Liu, Bingqian, Lu, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9129984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9293347
_version_ 1784712886885548032
author Zhao, Xiujuan
Wang, Yanbing
Chen, Yuqing
Tanumiharjo, Silvia
Wu, Yijin
Lian, Ping
Chen, Shida
Huang, Xia
Liu, Bingqian
Lu, Lin
author_facet Zhao, Xiujuan
Wang, Yanbing
Chen, Yuqing
Tanumiharjo, Silvia
Wu, Yijin
Lian, Ping
Chen, Shida
Huang, Xia
Liu, Bingqian
Lu, Lin
author_sort Zhao, Xiujuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze the visual prognosis of macular buckling in patients with high myopia foveoschisis (FS) and to identify factors that predict the final visual outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively included 155 eyes of 155 patients who underwent foveoschisis-related macular buckling. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and coexisting macular pathologies were assessed as a measure of surgical outcome, and multivariate linear regression was performed to identify factors affecting final visual prognosis. RESULTS: The mean preoperative BCVA was 1.19 ± 0.55 logMAR (20/308), while the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.82 ± 0.51 logMAR (20/133) (P < 0.001). Anatomical success was achieved in 151/155 eyes (97.42%) after the first surgery and in 155/155 eyes (100%) at the 2-year follow-up visit. Both preoperative and postoperative BCVA were better in eyes without macular hole (MH) than in eyes with MH. In patients with MH, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better than that before surgery when the MH was closed. However, the difference was not significant in patients with unclosed MH. Univariate analysis identified that baseline BCVA, age, MH, atrophic myopic maculopathy category, and postoperative intraretinal cyst were significantly related to BCVA at the postoperative 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative BCVA and age were significant factors. CONCLUSION: Better preoperative BCVA and younger age are predictors of better prognosis. Prompt surgery is advised for patients with myopic foveoschisis to improve their visual prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9129984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91299842022-05-25 Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling Zhao, Xiujuan Wang, Yanbing Chen, Yuqing Tanumiharjo, Silvia Wu, Yijin Lian, Ping Chen, Shida Huang, Xia Liu, Bingqian Lu, Lin J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To analyze the visual prognosis of macular buckling in patients with high myopia foveoschisis (FS) and to identify factors that predict the final visual outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively included 155 eyes of 155 patients who underwent foveoschisis-related macular buckling. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and coexisting macular pathologies were assessed as a measure of surgical outcome, and multivariate linear regression was performed to identify factors affecting final visual prognosis. RESULTS: The mean preoperative BCVA was 1.19 ± 0.55 logMAR (20/308), while the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.82 ± 0.51 logMAR (20/133) (P < 0.001). Anatomical success was achieved in 151/155 eyes (97.42%) after the first surgery and in 155/155 eyes (100%) at the 2-year follow-up visit. Both preoperative and postoperative BCVA were better in eyes without macular hole (MH) than in eyes with MH. In patients with MH, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better than that before surgery when the MH was closed. However, the difference was not significant in patients with unclosed MH. Univariate analysis identified that baseline BCVA, age, MH, atrophic myopic maculopathy category, and postoperative intraretinal cyst were significantly related to BCVA at the postoperative 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative BCVA and age were significant factors. CONCLUSION: Better preoperative BCVA and younger age are predictors of better prognosis. Prompt surgery is advised for patients with myopic foveoschisis to improve their visual prognosis. Hindawi 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9129984/ /pubmed/35620414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9293347 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiujuan Zhao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Xiujuan
Wang, Yanbing
Chen, Yuqing
Tanumiharjo, Silvia
Wu, Yijin
Lian, Ping
Chen, Shida
Huang, Xia
Liu, Bingqian
Lu, Lin
Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling
title Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling
title_full Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling
title_short Factors Affecting Visual Prognosis of Myopic Foveoschisis after Macular Buckling
title_sort factors affecting visual prognosis of myopic foveoschisis after macular buckling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9129984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9293347
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxiujuan factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT wangyanbing factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT chenyuqing factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT tanumiharjosilvia factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT wuyijin factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT lianping factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT chenshida factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT huangxia factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT liubingqian factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling
AT lulin factorsaffectingvisualprognosisofmyopicfoveoschisisaftermacularbuckling