Cargando…

Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

CONTEXT: Active surveillance (AS) of biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas may reduce overtreatment. However, on biopsy, the risk of misdiagnosis owing principally to entities with peculiar hybrids and overlap morphology, and phenotypes argues for early intervention. OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit and h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baboudjian, Michael, Moser, Daniel, Yanagisawa, Takafumi, Gondran-Tellier, Bastien, Compérat, Eva M., Ambrosetti, Damien, Daniel, Laurent, Bastide, Cyrille, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Lechevallier, Eric, Diana, Pietro, Breda, Alberto, Pradere, Benjamin, Boissier, Romain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.009
_version_ 1784712911105556480
author Baboudjian, Michael
Moser, Daniel
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Gondran-Tellier, Bastien
Compérat, Eva M.
Ambrosetti, Damien
Daniel, Laurent
Bastide, Cyrille
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Lechevallier, Eric
Diana, Pietro
Breda, Alberto
Pradere, Benjamin
Boissier, Romain
author_facet Baboudjian, Michael
Moser, Daniel
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Gondran-Tellier, Bastien
Compérat, Eva M.
Ambrosetti, Damien
Daniel, Laurent
Bastide, Cyrille
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Lechevallier, Eric
Diana, Pietro
Breda, Alberto
Pradere, Benjamin
Boissier, Romain
author_sort Baboudjian, Michael
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Active surveillance (AS) of biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas may reduce overtreatment. However, on biopsy, the risk of misdiagnosis owing principally to entities with peculiar hybrids and overlap morphology, and phenotypes argues for early intervention. OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit and harm of AS in biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from September 26 up to October 2021, for studies that analyzed the outcomes of AS in patients with biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of ten studies with 633 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. After a median follow-up of 34.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6–38.4), the overall definitive treatment rate from AS to definitive treatment was 17.3% (n = 75/433, six studies). The pooled pathological agreement between the initial renal mass biopsy and the surgical pathology report was 91.1%. The main indications for surgery during follow-up were rapid tumor growth and patient request. The pooled median growth rate was 1.55 mm/yr (95% CI 0.9–2.2). No metastasis or death related to renal oncocytoma was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Annual tumor growth of biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma is low. AS is oncologically safe, with favorable compliance of patients. Crossover to definitive treatment revealed a strong concordance between biopsy and final pathology. Further studies on the long-term outcomes of AS are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we examined the benefit and harm of active surveillance (AS) in biopsy-proven oncocytoma. Based on the available data, AS appears oncologically safe and may represent a promising alternative to immediate treatment. Patients should be included in AS decision discussions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9130085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91300852022-05-26 Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis Baboudjian, Michael Moser, Daniel Yanagisawa, Takafumi Gondran-Tellier, Bastien Compérat, Eva M. Ambrosetti, Damien Daniel, Laurent Bastide, Cyrille Shariat, Shahrokh F. Lechevallier, Eric Diana, Pietro Breda, Alberto Pradere, Benjamin Boissier, Romain Eur Urol Open Sci Review – Kidney Cancer CONTEXT: Active surveillance (AS) of biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas may reduce overtreatment. However, on biopsy, the risk of misdiagnosis owing principally to entities with peculiar hybrids and overlap morphology, and phenotypes argues for early intervention. OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit and harm of AS in biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from September 26 up to October 2021, for studies that analyzed the outcomes of AS in patients with biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of ten studies with 633 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. After a median follow-up of 34.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6–38.4), the overall definitive treatment rate from AS to definitive treatment was 17.3% (n = 75/433, six studies). The pooled pathological agreement between the initial renal mass biopsy and the surgical pathology report was 91.1%. The main indications for surgery during follow-up were rapid tumor growth and patient request. The pooled median growth rate was 1.55 mm/yr (95% CI 0.9–2.2). No metastasis or death related to renal oncocytoma was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Annual tumor growth of biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma is low. AS is oncologically safe, with favorable compliance of patients. Crossover to definitive treatment revealed a strong concordance between biopsy and final pathology. Further studies on the long-term outcomes of AS are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we examined the benefit and harm of active surveillance (AS) in biopsy-proven oncocytoma. Based on the available data, AS appears oncologically safe and may represent a promising alternative to immediate treatment. Patients should be included in AS decision discussions. Elsevier 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9130085/ /pubmed/35633831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.009 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review – Kidney Cancer
Baboudjian, Michael
Moser, Daniel
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Gondran-Tellier, Bastien
Compérat, Eva M.
Ambrosetti, Damien
Daniel, Laurent
Bastide, Cyrille
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Lechevallier, Eric
Diana, Pietro
Breda, Alberto
Pradere, Benjamin
Boissier, Romain
Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
title Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
title_full Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
title_fullStr Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
title_short Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
title_sort benefit and harm of active surveillance for biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis
topic Review – Kidney Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT baboudjianmichael benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT moserdaniel benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT yanagisawatakafumi benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT gondrantellierbastien benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT comperatevam benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT ambrosettidamien benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT daniellaurent benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT bastidecyrille benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT shariatshahrokhf benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT lechevalliereric benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT dianapietro benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT bredaalberto benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT praderebenjamin benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis
AT boissierromain benefitandharmofactivesurveillanceforbiopsyprovenrenaloncocytomaasystematicreviewandpooledanalysis