Cargando…

Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. METHODS: Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šikolová, Soňa, Urík, Milan, Hošnová, Dagmar, Kruntorád, Vít, Bartoš, Michal, Motyka, Oldřich, Jabandžiev, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x
_version_ 1784712927804129280
author Šikolová, Soňa
Urík, Milan
Hošnová, Dagmar
Kruntorád, Vít
Bartoš, Michal
Motyka, Oldřich
Jabandžiev, Petr
author_facet Šikolová, Soňa
Urík, Milan
Hošnová, Dagmar
Kruntorád, Vít
Bartoš, Michal
Motyka, Oldřich
Jabandžiev, Petr
author_sort Šikolová, Soňa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. METHODS: Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12). RESULTS: The mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3° to 16° and from 26.2° to 17.6°, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional. CONCLUSION: The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9130159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91301592022-05-26 Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children Šikolová, Soňa Urík, Milan Hošnová, Dagmar Kruntorád, Vít Bartoš, Michal Motyka, Oldřich Jabandžiev, Petr Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. METHODS: Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12). RESULTS: The mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3° to 16° and from 26.2° to 17.6°, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional. CONCLUSION: The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9130159/ /pubmed/34495351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Šikolová, Soňa
Urík, Milan
Hošnová, Dagmar
Kruntorád, Vít
Bartoš, Michal
Motyka, Oldřich
Jabandžiev, Petr
Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
title Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
title_full Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
title_fullStr Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
title_full_unstemmed Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
title_short Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
title_sort two bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sikolovasona twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren
AT urikmilan twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren
AT hosnovadagmar twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren
AT kruntoradvit twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren
AT bartosmichal twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren
AT motykaoldrich twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren
AT jabandzievpetr twobonebridgeboneconductionhearingimplantgenerationsaudiologicalbenefitandqualityofhearinginchildren