Cargando…

Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal

Sexual signals are important in speciation, but understanding their evolution is complex as these signals are often composed of multiple, genetically interdependent components. To understand how signals evolve, we thus need to consider selection responses in multiple components and account for the g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blankers, Thomas, Fruitet, Elise, Burdfield‐Steel, Emily, Groot, Astrid T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8941
_version_ 1784712956566568960
author Blankers, Thomas
Fruitet, Elise
Burdfield‐Steel, Emily
Groot, Astrid T.
author_facet Blankers, Thomas
Fruitet, Elise
Burdfield‐Steel, Emily
Groot, Astrid T.
author_sort Blankers, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Sexual signals are important in speciation, but understanding their evolution is complex as these signals are often composed of multiple, genetically interdependent components. To understand how signals evolve, we thus need to consider selection responses in multiple components and account for the genetic correlations among components. One intriguing possibility is that selection changes the genetic covariance structure of a multicomponent signal in a way that facilitates a response to selection. However, this hypothesis remains largely untested empirically. In this study, we investigate the evolutionary response of the multicomponent female sex pheromone blend of the moth Heliothis subflexa to 10 generations of artificial selection. We observed a selection response of about three‐quarters of a phenotypic standard deviation in the components under selection. Interestingly, other pheromone components that are biochemically and genetically linked to the components under selection did not change. We also found that after the onset of selection, the genetic covariance structure diverged, resulting in the disassociation of components under selection and components not under selection across the first two genetic principle components. Our findings provide rare empirical support for an intriguing mechanism by which a sexual signal can respond to selection without possible constraints from indirect selection responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9130292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91302922022-05-26 Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal Blankers, Thomas Fruitet, Elise Burdfield‐Steel, Emily Groot, Astrid T. Ecol Evol Research Articles Sexual signals are important in speciation, but understanding their evolution is complex as these signals are often composed of multiple, genetically interdependent components. To understand how signals evolve, we thus need to consider selection responses in multiple components and account for the genetic correlations among components. One intriguing possibility is that selection changes the genetic covariance structure of a multicomponent signal in a way that facilitates a response to selection. However, this hypothesis remains largely untested empirically. In this study, we investigate the evolutionary response of the multicomponent female sex pheromone blend of the moth Heliothis subflexa to 10 generations of artificial selection. We observed a selection response of about three‐quarters of a phenotypic standard deviation in the components under selection. Interestingly, other pheromone components that are biochemically and genetically linked to the components under selection did not change. We also found that after the onset of selection, the genetic covariance structure diverged, resulting in the disassociation of components under selection and components not under selection across the first two genetic principle components. Our findings provide rare empirical support for an intriguing mechanism by which a sexual signal can respond to selection without possible constraints from indirect selection responses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9130292/ /pubmed/35646318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8941 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Blankers, Thomas
Fruitet, Elise
Burdfield‐Steel, Emily
Groot, Astrid T.
Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
title Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
title_full Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
title_fullStr Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
title_full_unstemmed Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
title_short Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
title_sort experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8941
work_keys_str_mv AT blankersthomas experimentalevolutionofapheromonesignal
AT fruitetelise experimentalevolutionofapheromonesignal
AT burdfieldsteelemily experimentalevolutionofapheromonesignal
AT grootastridt experimentalevolutionofapheromonesignal