Cargando…

Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of perfusion only lung scans and the frequency of necessary addition of the ventilation part of the scans to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism (PE) during Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed perfusion lu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gayed, Isis W., Browne, Alexandra, Kaur, Harleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130684/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2022.05.004
_version_ 1784713022830280704
author Gayed, Isis W.
Browne, Alexandra
Kaur, Harleen
author_facet Gayed, Isis W.
Browne, Alexandra
Kaur, Harleen
author_sort Gayed, Isis W.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of perfusion only lung scans and the frequency of necessary addition of the ventilation part of the scans to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism (PE) during Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed perfusion lung scans’ results between April to December 2020. The images were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians as daily routine studies. Ventilation images were performed only if deemed necessary for accurate diagnosis of acute PE. RESULTS: A total of 128 lung perfusion scans in 127 patients were included. The scans were interpreted with certainty using the modified PIOPID criteria in 122 patients (95.3%). The results included low probability for acute PE in 110 patients (85.9%), normal in 6 patients (4.7%) and high probability of acute PE in 6 patients (4.7%). Ventilation imaging were performed in 4 patients with high probability, after negative testing for COVID19. The other 2 high probability results were confirmed clinically and with radiologic imaging. Only 6 scans (4.7%) were interpreted as intermediate perfusion scans, two of which due to inability to differentiate old from new perfusion defects in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease. Thus, the true indeterminate results due to the lack of ventilation scan were encountered in only 4 intermediate probability lung scans (3.1%). Thus, the total number of requested ventilation scans was 8 scans (6.2%) when considering both the high and intermediate probability interpretations. Six scans were performed (2 in the intermediate and 4 in the high probability scans). The two ventilation scans performed in the intermediate probability changed the diagnosis to low probability and the four performed in the high probability confirmed the initial interpretation of high probability scans by perfusion only. CONCLUSION: The ventilation part of lung scans is required only in a small number of patients for certain interpretation of the result. Perfusion lung scans are sufficient for evaluation of acute PE with certainty in most patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9130684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91306842022-05-25 Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital Gayed, Isis W. Browne, Alexandra Kaur, Harleen Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of perfusion only lung scans and the frequency of necessary addition of the ventilation part of the scans to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism (PE) during Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed perfusion lung scans’ results between April to December 2020. The images were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians as daily routine studies. Ventilation images were performed only if deemed necessary for accurate diagnosis of acute PE. RESULTS: A total of 128 lung perfusion scans in 127 patients were included. The scans were interpreted with certainty using the modified PIOPID criteria in 122 patients (95.3%). The results included low probability for acute PE in 110 patients (85.9%), normal in 6 patients (4.7%) and high probability of acute PE in 6 patients (4.7%). Ventilation imaging were performed in 4 patients with high probability, after negative testing for COVID19. The other 2 high probability results were confirmed clinically and with radiologic imaging. Only 6 scans (4.7%) were interpreted as intermediate perfusion scans, two of which due to inability to differentiate old from new perfusion defects in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease. Thus, the true indeterminate results due to the lack of ventilation scan were encountered in only 4 intermediate probability lung scans (3.1%). Thus, the total number of requested ventilation scans was 8 scans (6.2%) when considering both the high and intermediate probability interpretations. Six scans were performed (2 in the intermediate and 4 in the high probability scans). The two ventilation scans performed in the intermediate probability changed the diagnosis to low probability and the four performed in the high probability confirmed the initial interpretation of high probability scans by perfusion only. CONCLUSION: The ventilation part of lung scans is required only in a small number of patients for certain interpretation of the result. Perfusion lung scans are sufficient for evaluation of acute PE with certainty in most patients. 2022-09 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9130684/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2022.05.004 Text en Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Gayed, Isis W.
Browne, Alexandra
Kaur, Harleen
Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
title Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
title_full Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
title_fullStr Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
title_full_unstemmed Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
title_short Perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: COVID-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
title_sort perfusion lung scans during the pandemic: covid-19 experience in a large trauma hospital
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130684/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2022.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT gayedisisw perfusionlungscansduringthepandemiccovid19experienceinalargetraumahospital
AT brownealexandra perfusionlungscansduringthepandemiccovid19experienceinalargetraumahospital
AT kaurharleen perfusionlungscansduringthepandemiccovid19experienceinalargetraumahospital