Cargando…

Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND: The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire is widely used and tested in patients with breathing difficulties. The objective of this study was to translate and undertake the first evaluation of the measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the D-12 in patients with chronic obstructive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garratt, Andrew Malcolm, Nerheim, Ellen Margrethe, Einvik, Gunnar, Stavem, Knut, Edvardsen, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001262
_version_ 1784713104236478464
author Garratt, Andrew Malcolm
Nerheim, Ellen Margrethe
Einvik, Gunnar
Stavem, Knut
Edvardsen, Anne
author_facet Garratt, Andrew Malcolm
Nerheim, Ellen Margrethe
Einvik, Gunnar
Stavem, Knut
Edvardsen, Anne
author_sort Garratt, Andrew Malcolm
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire is widely used and tested in patients with breathing difficulties. The objective of this study was to translate and undertake the first evaluation of the measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the D-12 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attending a 4-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, sex and comorbidity. Based on a priori hypotheses, validity was assessed through comparisons with scores for the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) and clinical variables. RESULTS: There were 203 (86%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 65.2 (9.0) years, and 49% were female. The D-12 showed satisfactory structural validity including presence of physical and affective domains. There was acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality for the two domains, and no evidence of DIF. Correlations with scores for the CAT, HADS and clinical variables were as hypothesised and highest for domains assessing similar aspects of health. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the D-12 showed good evidence for validity and internal consistency in this group of patients with COPD, including support for two separate domains. Further testing for these measurement properties is recommended in other Norwegian patients with dyspnoea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9131054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91310542022-06-09 Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD Garratt, Andrew Malcolm Nerheim, Ellen Margrethe Einvik, Gunnar Stavem, Knut Edvardsen, Anne BMJ Open Respir Res Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease BACKGROUND: The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire is widely used and tested in patients with breathing difficulties. The objective of this study was to translate and undertake the first evaluation of the measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the D-12 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attending a 4-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, sex and comorbidity. Based on a priori hypotheses, validity was assessed through comparisons with scores for the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) and clinical variables. RESULTS: There were 203 (86%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 65.2 (9.0) years, and 49% were female. The D-12 showed satisfactory structural validity including presence of physical and affective domains. There was acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality for the two domains, and no evidence of DIF. Correlations with scores for the CAT, HADS and clinical variables were as hypothesised and highest for domains assessing similar aspects of health. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the D-12 showed good evidence for validity and internal consistency in this group of patients with COPD, including support for two separate domains. Further testing for these measurement properties is recommended in other Norwegian patients with dyspnoea. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9131054/ /pubmed/35609940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001262 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Garratt, Andrew Malcolm
Nerheim, Ellen Margrethe
Einvik, Gunnar
Stavem, Knut
Edvardsen, Anne
Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD
title Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD
title_full Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD
title_short Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD
title_sort evaluation of the norwegian version of the dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with copd
topic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001262
work_keys_str_mv AT garrattandrewmalcolm evaluationofthenorwegianversionofthedyspnoea12questionnaireinpatientswithcopd
AT nerheimellenmargrethe evaluationofthenorwegianversionofthedyspnoea12questionnaireinpatientswithcopd
AT einvikgunnar evaluationofthenorwegianversionofthedyspnoea12questionnaireinpatientswithcopd
AT stavemknut evaluationofthenorwegianversionofthedyspnoea12questionnaireinpatientswithcopd
AT edvardsenanne evaluationofthenorwegianversionofthedyspnoea12questionnaireinpatientswithcopd