Cargando…

Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lung surgery (MILS) gradually became the primary surgical therapy for lung cancer, which remains the leading cause of cancer death. Adequate muscle relaxation by deep neuromuscular block (NMB) is particularly necessary for MILS to provide a satisfactory surgical fiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Jianqiao, Du, Li, Deng, Xiaoqian, Zhang, Lu, Wang, Jia, Chen, Guo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056816
_version_ 1784713116254208000
author Zheng, Jianqiao
Du, Li
Deng, Xiaoqian
Zhang, Lu
Wang, Jia
Chen, Guo
author_facet Zheng, Jianqiao
Du, Li
Deng, Xiaoqian
Zhang, Lu
Wang, Jia
Chen, Guo
author_sort Zheng, Jianqiao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lung surgery (MILS) gradually became the primary surgical therapy for lung cancer, which remains the leading cause of cancer death. Adequate muscle relaxation by deep neuromuscular block (NMB) is particularly necessary for MILS to provide a satisfactory surgical field. However, deep NMB for MILS remains controversial, as one-lung ventilation may provide an acceptable surgical field. Then, we will perform a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the efficacy of deep NMB for MILS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Chinese BioMedical Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang databases from inception to March 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials of adult participants undergoing MILS with deep NMB. Studies published in English or Chinese will be considered. The primary outcome will be the surgical conditions according to the surgeon’s perspective. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of perioperative events and perioperative mortality. Heterogeneity will be assessed by the χ(2) test and I(2) statistic. Data will be synthesised by both a fixed-effect and a random-effects meta-analysis, with an intention to present the random-effects result if there is no indication of funnel plot asymmetry. Otherwise, metaregression will be used. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, trial sequential analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the evidence quality and control the risks of random errors. Funnel plots and Egger’s regression test will be used to assess publication bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review protocol. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021254016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9131110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91311102022-06-09 Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Zheng, Jianqiao Du, Li Deng, Xiaoqian Zhang, Lu Wang, Jia Chen, Guo BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lung surgery (MILS) gradually became the primary surgical therapy for lung cancer, which remains the leading cause of cancer death. Adequate muscle relaxation by deep neuromuscular block (NMB) is particularly necessary for MILS to provide a satisfactory surgical field. However, deep NMB for MILS remains controversial, as one-lung ventilation may provide an acceptable surgical field. Then, we will perform a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the efficacy of deep NMB for MILS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Chinese BioMedical Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang databases from inception to March 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials of adult participants undergoing MILS with deep NMB. Studies published in English or Chinese will be considered. The primary outcome will be the surgical conditions according to the surgeon’s perspective. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of perioperative events and perioperative mortality. Heterogeneity will be assessed by the χ(2) test and I(2) statistic. Data will be synthesised by both a fixed-effect and a random-effects meta-analysis, with an intention to present the random-effects result if there is no indication of funnel plot asymmetry. Otherwise, metaregression will be used. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, trial sequential analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the evidence quality and control the risks of random errors. Funnel plots and Egger’s regression test will be used to assess publication bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review protocol. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021254016. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9131110/ /pubmed/35613793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056816 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zheng, Jianqiao
Du, Li
Deng, Xiaoqian
Zhang, Lu
Wang, Jia
Chen, Guo
Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_short Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_sort deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056816
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjianqiao deepneuromuscularblockforminimallyinvasivelungsurgeryaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT duli deepneuromuscularblockforminimallyinvasivelungsurgeryaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT dengxiaoqian deepneuromuscularblockforminimallyinvasivelungsurgeryaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT zhanglu deepneuromuscularblockforminimallyinvasivelungsurgeryaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT wangjia deepneuromuscularblockforminimallyinvasivelungsurgeryaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT chenguo deepneuromuscularblockforminimallyinvasivelungsurgeryaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis