Cargando…

Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased annually, which has seriously threatened the health and quality of life of patients. In the treatment of CRC, both laparoscopic and radical resection are widely used. AIM: To explore and discuss clinical efficacy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Long-Hai, Yang, Bo, Su, Xiao-Qin, Zhou, Yue, Zhang, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665125
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042
_version_ 1784713137880039424
author He, Long-Hai
Yang, Bo
Su, Xiao-Qin
Zhou, Yue
Zhang, Zhen
author_facet He, Long-Hai
Yang, Bo
Su, Xiao-Qin
Zhou, Yue
Zhang, Zhen
author_sort He, Long-Hai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased annually, which has seriously threatened the health and quality of life of patients. In the treatment of CRC, both laparoscopic and radical resection are widely used. AIM: To explore and discuss clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response of laparoscopic and open radical resection of CRC. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with CRC diagnosed in our hospital from March 2016 to April 2021 were selected, and were divided into the study group (n = 48) and control group (n = 48) using a simple random method. The control group was treated with open radical resection of CRC, and the study group was treated with laparoscopic radical resection of CRC. The perioperative conditions (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, number of lymph node dissections and length of hospital stay), inflammatory response index levels [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP)] before and after operation, pain stress response indices [levels of neuropeptide (NPY), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)], and the incidence of the complications between the two groups were counted. RESULTS: The operation time in the study group was (186.18 ± 33.54 min), which was longer than that of the control group (129.38 ± 26.83 min), but the intraoperative blood loss (111.34 ± 21.45 mL), recovery time of gastrointestinal function (25.35 ± 4.55 h), and hospital stay (10.09 ± 2.38 d) were better than those in the control group (163.77 ± 32.41 mL, 36.06 ± 7.13 h, 13.51 ± 3.66 d) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections between the study group (15.19 ± 3.04) and the control group (16.20 ± 2.98) (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the levels of serum IL-6 (9.79 ± 4.11 ng/mL), IL-8 (3.79 ± 1.71 ng/L), IL-10 (48.96 ± 12.51 ng/L) and CRP (7.98 ± 2.33 mg/L) in the study group and the control group (10.56 ± 3.78 ng/mL, 4.08 ± 1.45 ng/L, 50.13 ± 11.67 ng/L, 8.29 ± 2.60 mg/L) before the operation (P > 0.05). After the operation, there was no significant difference between the levels of serum IL-6 (19.11 ± 6.68 ng/mL). There was no significant difference in serum NPY (109.79 ± 13.46 UG/L), PGE2 (269.54 ± 37.34 ng/L), 5-HT (151.70 ± 18.86 ng/L) between the study group and the control group (113.29 ± 15.01 UG/L, 273.91 ± 40.04 ng/L, 148.85 ± 20.45 ng/L) before the operation (P > 0.05). The incidence of the complications in the study group (4.17%) was lower than that of the control group (18.75%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical resection of CRC can reduce surgical trauma, inflammatory response and pain stress caused by surgery, which shortens rehabilitation of patients, with a low incidence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9131216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91312162022-06-04 Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer He, Long-Hai Yang, Bo Su, Xiao-Qin Zhou, Yue Zhang, Zhen World J Clin Cases Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased annually, which has seriously threatened the health and quality of life of patients. In the treatment of CRC, both laparoscopic and radical resection are widely used. AIM: To explore and discuss clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response of laparoscopic and open radical resection of CRC. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with CRC diagnosed in our hospital from March 2016 to April 2021 were selected, and were divided into the study group (n = 48) and control group (n = 48) using a simple random method. The control group was treated with open radical resection of CRC, and the study group was treated with laparoscopic radical resection of CRC. The perioperative conditions (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, number of lymph node dissections and length of hospital stay), inflammatory response index levels [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP)] before and after operation, pain stress response indices [levels of neuropeptide (NPY), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)], and the incidence of the complications between the two groups were counted. RESULTS: The operation time in the study group was (186.18 ± 33.54 min), which was longer than that of the control group (129.38 ± 26.83 min), but the intraoperative blood loss (111.34 ± 21.45 mL), recovery time of gastrointestinal function (25.35 ± 4.55 h), and hospital stay (10.09 ± 2.38 d) were better than those in the control group (163.77 ± 32.41 mL, 36.06 ± 7.13 h, 13.51 ± 3.66 d) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections between the study group (15.19 ± 3.04) and the control group (16.20 ± 2.98) (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the levels of serum IL-6 (9.79 ± 4.11 ng/mL), IL-8 (3.79 ± 1.71 ng/L), IL-10 (48.96 ± 12.51 ng/L) and CRP (7.98 ± 2.33 mg/L) in the study group and the control group (10.56 ± 3.78 ng/mL, 4.08 ± 1.45 ng/L, 50.13 ± 11.67 ng/L, 8.29 ± 2.60 mg/L) before the operation (P > 0.05). After the operation, there was no significant difference between the levels of serum IL-6 (19.11 ± 6.68 ng/mL). There was no significant difference in serum NPY (109.79 ± 13.46 UG/L), PGE2 (269.54 ± 37.34 ng/L), 5-HT (151.70 ± 18.86 ng/L) between the study group and the control group (113.29 ± 15.01 UG/L, 273.91 ± 40.04 ng/L, 148.85 ± 20.45 ng/L) before the operation (P > 0.05). The incidence of the complications in the study group (4.17%) was lower than that of the control group (18.75%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical resection of CRC can reduce surgical trauma, inflammatory response and pain stress caused by surgery, which shortens rehabilitation of patients, with a low incidence of complications. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-05-06 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9131216/ /pubmed/35665125 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
He, Long-Hai
Yang, Bo
Su, Xiao-Qin
Zhou, Yue
Zhang, Zhen
Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
title Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
title_full Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
title_short Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
title_sort comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665125
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042
work_keys_str_mv AT helonghai comparisonofclinicalefficacyandpostoperativeinflammatoryresponsebetweenlaparoscopicandopenradicalresectionofcolorectalcancer
AT yangbo comparisonofclinicalefficacyandpostoperativeinflammatoryresponsebetweenlaparoscopicandopenradicalresectionofcolorectalcancer
AT suxiaoqin comparisonofclinicalefficacyandpostoperativeinflammatoryresponsebetweenlaparoscopicandopenradicalresectionofcolorectalcancer
AT zhouyue comparisonofclinicalefficacyandpostoperativeinflammatoryresponsebetweenlaparoscopicandopenradicalresectionofcolorectalcancer
AT zhangzhen comparisonofclinicalefficacyandpostoperativeinflammatoryresponsebetweenlaparoscopicandopenradicalresectionofcolorectalcancer