Cargando…

Managing Traumatic Brain Injury During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic–A Case-Matched Controlled Analysis of Immediate Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to compare their outcome with case-matched controls from the prepandemic phase. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alam, Intekhab, Garg, Kanwaljeet, Raheja, Amol, Tandon, Vivek, Sharma, Ravi, Singh, Manmohan, Singh, Gyaninder Pal, Mishra, Shashwat, Singh, Pankaj Kumar, Agrawal, Deepak, Soni, Kapil Dev, Suri, Ashish, Chandra, Poodipedi Sarat, Kale, Shashank Sharad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.076
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to compare their outcome with case-matched controls from the prepandemic phase. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study in which all patients with TBI admitted during COVID-19 pandemic phase (Arm A) from March 24, 2020 to November 30, 2020 were matched with age and Glasgow Coma Scale score–matched controls from the patients admitted before March 2020 (Arm B). RESULTS: The total number of patients matched in each arm was 118. The length of hospital stay (8 days vs. 5 days; P < 0.001), transit time from emergency room to operation room (150 minutes vs. 97 minutes; P = 0.271), anesthesia induction time (75 minutes vs. 45 minutes; P = 0.002), and operative duration (275 minutes vs. 180 minutes; P = 0.002) were longer in arm A. Although the incidence of fever and pneumonia was significantly higher in arm A than in arm B (50% vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001 and 27.1% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001, respectively), outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended) and mortality (18.6% vs. 14.4% respectively; P = 0.42) were similar in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of the patients managed for TBI during the COVID-19 pandemic was similar to matched patients with TBI managed at our center before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This finding suggests that the guidelines followed during the COVID-19 pandemic were effective in dealing with patients with TBI. This model can serve as a guide for any future pandemic waves for effective management of patients with TBI without compromising their outcome.