Combined model of radiomics, clinical, and imaging features for differentiating focal pneumonia-like lung cancer from pulmonary inflammatory lesions: an exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Only few studies have focused on differentiating focal pneumonia-like lung cancer (F-PLC) from focal pulmonary inflammatory lesion (F-PIL). This exploratory study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of a combined model incorporating computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics signatures, clinical factors, and CT morphological features for distinguishing F-PLC and F-PIL. METHODS: In total, 396 patients pathologically diagnosed with F-PLC and F-PIL from two medical institutions between January 2015 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients from center 1 were included in the training (n = 242) and internal validation (n = 104) cohorts. Moreover, patients from center 2 were classified under the external validation cohort (n = 50). The clinical and CT morphological characteristics of both groups were compared first. And then, a clinical model incorporating clinical and CT morphological features, a radiomics model reflecting the radiomics signature of lung lesions, and a combined model were developed and validated, respectively. RESULTS: Age, gender, smoking history, respiratory symptoms, air bronchogram, necrosis, and pleural attachment differed significantly between the F-PLC and F-PIL groups (all P < 0.05). For the clinical model, age, necrosis, and pleural attachment were the most effective factors to differentiate F-PIL from F-PLC, with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.838, 0.819, and 0.717 in the training and internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. For the radiomics model, five radiomics features were found to be significantly related to the identification of F-PLC and F-PIL (all P < 0.001), with the AUCs of 0.804, 0.877, and 0.734 in the training and internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. For the combined model, five radiomics features, age, necrosis, and pleural attachment were independent predictors for distinguishing between F-PLC and F-PIL, with the AUCs of 0.915, 0.899, and 0.805 in the training and internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The combined model exhibited a better performance than had the clinical and radiomics models. CONCLUSIONS: The combined model, which incorporates CT-based radiomics signatures, clinical factors, and CT morphological characteristics, is effective in differentiating F-PLC from F-PIL.