Cargando…
Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease
BACKGROUND: Diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) has a substantial burden on both individuals and healthcare systems both globally and in Australia. There is a pressing need for updated guidelines on wound healing interventions to improve outcomes for people living with DFU. A national expert pane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00544-5 |
_version_ | 1784713200465346560 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Pamela Carville, Keryln Swanson, Terry Lazzarini, Peter A. Charles, James Cheney, Jane Prentice, Jenny |
author_facet | Chen, Pamela Carville, Keryln Swanson, Terry Lazzarini, Peter A. Charles, James Cheney, Jane Prentice, Jenny |
author_sort | Chen, Pamela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) has a substantial burden on both individuals and healthcare systems both globally and in Australia. There is a pressing need for updated guidelines on wound healing interventions to improve outcomes for people living with DFU. A national expert panel was convened to develop new Australian evidence-based guidelines on wound healing interventions for people with DFU by adapting suitable international guidelines to the Australian context. METHODS: The panel followed National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) procedures to adapt suitable international guidelines by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) to the Australian context. The panel systematically screened, assessed and judged all IWGDF wound healing recommendations using ADAPTE and GRADE frameworks for adapting guidelines to decide which recommendations should be adopted, adapted or excluded in the Australian context. Each recommendation had their wording, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation re-evaluated, plus rationale, justifications and implementation considerations provided for the Australian context. This guideline underwent public consultation, further revision and approval by ten national peak bodies. RESULTS: Thirteen IWGDF wound healing recommendations were evaluated in this process. After screening, nine recommendations were adopted and four were adapted after full assessment. Two recommendations had their strength of recommendations downgraded, one intervention was not currently approved for use in Australia, one intervention specified the need to obtain informed consent to be acceptable in Australia, and another was reworded to clarify best standard of care. Overall, five wound healing interventions have been recommended as having the evidence-based potential to improve wound healing in specific types of DFU when used in conjunction with other best standards of DFU care, including sucrose-octasulfate impregnated dressing, systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, placental-derived products, and the autologous combined leucocyte, platelet and fibrin dressing. The six new guidelines and the full protocol can be found at: https://diabetesfeetaustralia.org/new-guidelines/ CONCLUSIONS: The IWGDF guideline for wound healing interventions has been adapted to suit the Australian context, and in particular for geographically remote and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This new national wound healing guideline, endorsed by ten national peak bodies, also highlights important considerations for implementation, monitoring, and future research priorities in Australia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00544-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9131573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91315732022-05-26 Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease Chen, Pamela Carville, Keryln Swanson, Terry Lazzarini, Peter A. Charles, James Cheney, Jane Prentice, Jenny J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) has a substantial burden on both individuals and healthcare systems both globally and in Australia. There is a pressing need for updated guidelines on wound healing interventions to improve outcomes for people living with DFU. A national expert panel was convened to develop new Australian evidence-based guidelines on wound healing interventions for people with DFU by adapting suitable international guidelines to the Australian context. METHODS: The panel followed National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) procedures to adapt suitable international guidelines by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) to the Australian context. The panel systematically screened, assessed and judged all IWGDF wound healing recommendations using ADAPTE and GRADE frameworks for adapting guidelines to decide which recommendations should be adopted, adapted or excluded in the Australian context. Each recommendation had their wording, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation re-evaluated, plus rationale, justifications and implementation considerations provided for the Australian context. This guideline underwent public consultation, further revision and approval by ten national peak bodies. RESULTS: Thirteen IWGDF wound healing recommendations were evaluated in this process. After screening, nine recommendations were adopted and four were adapted after full assessment. Two recommendations had their strength of recommendations downgraded, one intervention was not currently approved for use in Australia, one intervention specified the need to obtain informed consent to be acceptable in Australia, and another was reworded to clarify best standard of care. Overall, five wound healing interventions have been recommended as having the evidence-based potential to improve wound healing in specific types of DFU when used in conjunction with other best standards of DFU care, including sucrose-octasulfate impregnated dressing, systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, placental-derived products, and the autologous combined leucocyte, platelet and fibrin dressing. The six new guidelines and the full protocol can be found at: https://diabetesfeetaustralia.org/new-guidelines/ CONCLUSIONS: The IWGDF guideline for wound healing interventions has been adapted to suit the Australian context, and in particular for geographically remote and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This new national wound healing guideline, endorsed by ten national peak bodies, also highlights important considerations for implementation, monitoring, and future research priorities in Australia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00544-5. BioMed Central 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9131573/ /pubmed/35610723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00544-5 Text en © Diabetes Feet Australia 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Pamela Carville, Keryln Swanson, Terry Lazzarini, Peter A. Charles, James Cheney, Jane Prentice, Jenny Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
title | Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
title_full | Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
title_fullStr | Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
title_short | Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
title_sort | australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00544-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenpamela australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT carvillekeryln australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT swansonterry australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT lazzarinipetera australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT charlesjames australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT cheneyjane australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT prenticejenny australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease AT australianguidelineonwoundhealinginterventionstoenhancehealingoffootulcerspartofthe2021australianevidencebasedguidelinesfordiabetesrelatedfootdisease |