Cargando…

Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling

Muscle co‐contraction between the agonist and antagonist muscles often causes low energy efficiency or movement disturbances. Surface electromyography biofeedback (sEMG‐BF) has been used to train muscle activation or relaxation but it is unknown whether sEMG‐BF reduces muscle co‐contraction. We hypo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kibushi, Benio, Okada, Junichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611763
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15288
_version_ 1784713206780919808
author Kibushi, Benio
Okada, Junichi
author_facet Kibushi, Benio
Okada, Junichi
author_sort Kibushi, Benio
collection PubMed
description Muscle co‐contraction between the agonist and antagonist muscles often causes low energy efficiency or movement disturbances. Surface electromyography biofeedback (sEMG‐BF) has been used to train muscle activation or relaxation but it is unknown whether sEMG‐BF reduces muscle co‐contraction. We hypothesized that auditory sEMG‐BF improves muscle co‐contraction. Our purpose was to investigate whether auditory sEMG‐BF is effective in improving muscle co‐contraction. Thirteen participants pedaled on a road bike using four different auditory sEMG‐BF conditions. We measured the surface electromyography at the lower limb muscles. The vastus lateralis (VL) and the semitendinosus (ST) activities were individually transformed into different beep sounds. Four feedback conditions were no‐feedback, VL feedback, ST feedback, and both VL and ST feedback. We compared the co‐contraction index (COI) of the knee extensor‐flexor muscles and the hip flexor‐extensor muscles among the conditions. There were no significant differences in COIs among the conditions (p = 0.83 for the COI of the knee extensor‐flexor; p = 0.32 for the COI of the hip flexor‐extensor). To improve the muscle co‐contraction by sEMG‐BF, it may be necessary to convert muscle activation into a muscle co‐contraction. We concluded that individual sEMG‐BF does not immediately improve muscle co‐contraction during pedaling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9131599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91315992022-05-26 Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling Kibushi, Benio Okada, Junichi Physiol Rep Original Articles Muscle co‐contraction between the agonist and antagonist muscles often causes low energy efficiency or movement disturbances. Surface electromyography biofeedback (sEMG‐BF) has been used to train muscle activation or relaxation but it is unknown whether sEMG‐BF reduces muscle co‐contraction. We hypothesized that auditory sEMG‐BF improves muscle co‐contraction. Our purpose was to investigate whether auditory sEMG‐BF is effective in improving muscle co‐contraction. Thirteen participants pedaled on a road bike using four different auditory sEMG‐BF conditions. We measured the surface electromyography at the lower limb muscles. The vastus lateralis (VL) and the semitendinosus (ST) activities were individually transformed into different beep sounds. Four feedback conditions were no‐feedback, VL feedback, ST feedback, and both VL and ST feedback. We compared the co‐contraction index (COI) of the knee extensor‐flexor muscles and the hip flexor‐extensor muscles among the conditions. There were no significant differences in COIs among the conditions (p = 0.83 for the COI of the knee extensor‐flexor; p = 0.32 for the COI of the hip flexor‐extensor). To improve the muscle co‐contraction by sEMG‐BF, it may be necessary to convert muscle activation into a muscle co‐contraction. We concluded that individual sEMG‐BF does not immediately improve muscle co‐contraction during pedaling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9131599/ /pubmed/35611763 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15288 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kibushi, Benio
Okada, Junichi
Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
title Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
title_full Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
title_fullStr Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
title_full_unstemmed Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
title_short Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
title_sort auditory semg biofeedback for reducing muscle co‐contraction during pedaling
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611763
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15288
work_keys_str_mv AT kibushibenio auditorysemgbiofeedbackforreducingmusclecocontractionduringpedaling
AT okadajunichi auditorysemgbiofeedbackforreducingmusclecocontractionduringpedaling