Cargando…

Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility, implementation and outcomes of an Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) intervention in primary care to assist older adults at risk of functional decline by developing a personalized support plan. DESIGN: Feasibility cluster randomized control trial. SETTING AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brazil, Kevin, Cardwell, Christopher, Carter, Gillian, Clarke, Mike, Corry, Dagmar Anna S., Fahey, Tom, Gillespie, Patrick, Hobbins, Anna, McGlade, Kieran, O’Halloran, Peter, O’Neill, Nina, Wallace, Emma, Doyle, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03128-x
_version_ 1784713212008071168
author Brazil, Kevin
Cardwell, Christopher
Carter, Gillian
Clarke, Mike
Corry, Dagmar Anna S.
Fahey, Tom
Gillespie, Patrick
Hobbins, Anna
McGlade, Kieran
O’Halloran, Peter
O’Neill, Nina
Wallace, Emma
Doyle, Frank
author_facet Brazil, Kevin
Cardwell, Christopher
Carter, Gillian
Clarke, Mike
Corry, Dagmar Anna S.
Fahey, Tom
Gillespie, Patrick
Hobbins, Anna
McGlade, Kieran
O’Halloran, Peter
O’Neill, Nina
Wallace, Emma
Doyle, Frank
author_sort Brazil, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility, implementation and outcomes of an Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) intervention in primary care to assist older adults at risk of functional decline by developing a personalized support plan. DESIGN: Feasibility cluster randomized control trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight primary care practices (four in Northern Ireland, United Kingdom and four in the Republic of Ireland) were randomly assigned to either intervention or control arm. Eligible patients were those identified in each practice as 70 years of age or older and assessed as at risk of functional decline. Study participants (intervention n = 34, control n = 31) and research staff were not blinded to group assignment. ANTICIPATORY CARE INTERVENTION: The intervention delivered by a registered nurse including: a) a home-based patient assessment; b) care planning on the basis of a holistic patient assessment, and c) documentation of a support plan. OUTCOME MEASURES: A conceptual framework (RE-AIM) guided the assessment on the potential impact of the ACP intervention on patient quality of life, mental health, healthcare utilisation, costs, perception of person-centred care, and reduction of potentially inappropriate prescribing. Data were collected at baseline and at 10 weeks and six months following delivery of the intervention. RESULTS: All pre-specified feasibility indicators were met. Patients were unanimous in the acceptance of the ACP intervention. Health care providers viewed the ACP intervention as feasible to implement in routine clinical practice with attending community supports. While there were no significant differences on the primary outcomes (EQ-5D-5L: -0.07 (-0.17, 0.04) p = .180; CES-D: 1.2 (-2.5, 4.8) p = .468) and most secondary measures, ancillary analysis on social support showed responsiveness to the intervention. Incremental cost analysis revealed a mean reduction in costs of €320 per patient (95% CI -31 to 25; p = 0.82) for intervention relative to the control. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully tested the ACP intervention in primary care settings and have shown that it is feasible to implement. The ACP intervention deserves further testing in a definitive trial to determine whether its implementation would lead to better outcomes or reduced costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03902743. Registered on 4 April 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03128-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9131621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91316212022-05-26 Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial Brazil, Kevin Cardwell, Christopher Carter, Gillian Clarke, Mike Corry, Dagmar Anna S. Fahey, Tom Gillespie, Patrick Hobbins, Anna McGlade, Kieran O’Halloran, Peter O’Neill, Nina Wallace, Emma Doyle, Frank BMC Geriatr Research OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility, implementation and outcomes of an Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) intervention in primary care to assist older adults at risk of functional decline by developing a personalized support plan. DESIGN: Feasibility cluster randomized control trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight primary care practices (four in Northern Ireland, United Kingdom and four in the Republic of Ireland) were randomly assigned to either intervention or control arm. Eligible patients were those identified in each practice as 70 years of age or older and assessed as at risk of functional decline. Study participants (intervention n = 34, control n = 31) and research staff were not blinded to group assignment. ANTICIPATORY CARE INTERVENTION: The intervention delivered by a registered nurse including: a) a home-based patient assessment; b) care planning on the basis of a holistic patient assessment, and c) documentation of a support plan. OUTCOME MEASURES: A conceptual framework (RE-AIM) guided the assessment on the potential impact of the ACP intervention on patient quality of life, mental health, healthcare utilisation, costs, perception of person-centred care, and reduction of potentially inappropriate prescribing. Data were collected at baseline and at 10 weeks and six months following delivery of the intervention. RESULTS: All pre-specified feasibility indicators were met. Patients were unanimous in the acceptance of the ACP intervention. Health care providers viewed the ACP intervention as feasible to implement in routine clinical practice with attending community supports. While there were no significant differences on the primary outcomes (EQ-5D-5L: -0.07 (-0.17, 0.04) p = .180; CES-D: 1.2 (-2.5, 4.8) p = .468) and most secondary measures, ancillary analysis on social support showed responsiveness to the intervention. Incremental cost analysis revealed a mean reduction in costs of €320 per patient (95% CI -31 to 25; p = 0.82) for intervention relative to the control. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully tested the ACP intervention in primary care settings and have shown that it is feasible to implement. The ACP intervention deserves further testing in a definitive trial to determine whether its implementation would lead to better outcomes or reduced costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03902743. Registered on 4 April 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03128-x. BioMed Central 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9131621/ /pubmed/35610581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03128-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Brazil, Kevin
Cardwell, Christopher
Carter, Gillian
Clarke, Mike
Corry, Dagmar Anna S.
Fahey, Tom
Gillespie, Patrick
Hobbins, Anna
McGlade, Kieran
O’Halloran, Peter
O’Neill, Nina
Wallace, Emma
Doyle, Frank
Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
title Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03128-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brazilkevin anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cardwellchristopher anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cartergillian anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkemike anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT corrydagmarannas anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT faheytom anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gillespiepatrick anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hobbinsanna anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgladekieran anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohalloranpeter anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oneillnina anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wallaceemma anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doylefrank anticipatorycareplanningforcommunitydwellingolderadultsatriskoffunctionaldeclineafeasibilityclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial