Cargando…

Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: Recently developed buprenorphine depot injections have the potential to reduce risk for diversion and misuse, and to increase adherence with fewer visits for supervised intake. However, it is unclear how patients perceive this new form of medication. The purpose of this study was to expl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Björn, Flensburg, Olivia Liahaugen, Capusan, Andrea Johansson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00474-2
_version_ 1784713216660602880
author Johnson, Björn
Flensburg, Olivia Liahaugen
Capusan, Andrea Johansson
author_facet Johnson, Björn
Flensburg, Olivia Liahaugen
Capusan, Andrea Johansson
author_sort Johnson, Björn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently developed buprenorphine depot injections have the potential to reduce risk for diversion and misuse, and to increase adherence with fewer visits for supervised intake. However, it is unclear how patients perceive this new form of medication. The purpose of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of depot injections and their reasons for continuing, discontinuing, or declining depot injection treatment. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 32 people, 14 of whom had ongoing depot injection treatment, 11 who had discontinued depot-injections and switched to other medication and seven who had declined treatment with depot formulations. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analysed using NVivo, based on this overall stratification into three participant groups. RESULTS: The main categories relate to the effects and side effects of the depot formulation, social and practical factors, psychological benefits and disadvantages, and interactions with treatment staff. Social and practical factors were of importance for choosing depot formulations, such as increased freedom and their making it easier to combine treatment with work and family life, as well as psychological advantages including “feeling normal”. Initial withdrawal symptoms that resolved themselves after a number of injections were reported by most participants. Reliable information and patient-staff relationships characterized by trust helped patients to cope with these initial problems. Those who discontinued treatment often did so near the beginning of the treatment, reporting withdrawal symptoms and insufficient effects as the main reasons. Coercion and insufficient information contributed to a negative pharmaceutical atmosphere at one of the clinics, which may have adversely influenced perceptions of depot formulations and decreased willingness to accept and continue treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine depot injections may have social, practical, and psychological benefits compared to other formulations. However, depot injections are not perceived as an attractive option by all patients. Trust, consistent and adequate information, and awareness of the implications of the pharmaceutical atmosphere should be considered when introducing new medications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-022-00474-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9131643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91316432022-05-26 Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study Johnson, Björn Flensburg, Olivia Liahaugen Capusan, Andrea Johansson Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Recently developed buprenorphine depot injections have the potential to reduce risk for diversion and misuse, and to increase adherence with fewer visits for supervised intake. However, it is unclear how patients perceive this new form of medication. The purpose of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of depot injections and their reasons for continuing, discontinuing, or declining depot injection treatment. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 32 people, 14 of whom had ongoing depot injection treatment, 11 who had discontinued depot-injections and switched to other medication and seven who had declined treatment with depot formulations. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analysed using NVivo, based on this overall stratification into three participant groups. RESULTS: The main categories relate to the effects and side effects of the depot formulation, social and practical factors, psychological benefits and disadvantages, and interactions with treatment staff. Social and practical factors were of importance for choosing depot formulations, such as increased freedom and their making it easier to combine treatment with work and family life, as well as psychological advantages including “feeling normal”. Initial withdrawal symptoms that resolved themselves after a number of injections were reported by most participants. Reliable information and patient-staff relationships characterized by trust helped patients to cope with these initial problems. Those who discontinued treatment often did so near the beginning of the treatment, reporting withdrawal symptoms and insufficient effects as the main reasons. Coercion and insufficient information contributed to a negative pharmaceutical atmosphere at one of the clinics, which may have adversely influenced perceptions of depot formulations and decreased willingness to accept and continue treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine depot injections may have social, practical, and psychological benefits compared to other formulations. However, depot injections are not perceived as an attractive option by all patients. Trust, consistent and adequate information, and awareness of the implications of the pharmaceutical atmosphere should be considered when introducing new medications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-022-00474-2. BioMed Central 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9131643/ /pubmed/35614466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00474-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Johnson, Björn
Flensburg, Olivia Liahaugen
Capusan, Andrea Johansson
Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
title Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
title_full Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
title_short Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
title_sort patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction – a qualitative interview study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00474-2
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonbjorn patientperspectivesondepotbuprenorphinetreatmentforopioidaddictionaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT flensburgolivialiahaugen patientperspectivesondepotbuprenorphinetreatmentforopioidaddictionaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT capusanandreajohansson patientperspectivesondepotbuprenorphinetreatmentforopioidaddictionaqualitativeinterviewstudy