Cargando…
Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study
BACKGROUND: Appropriate health system utilisation during pregnancy is fundamental for maintaining maternal and child’s health. To study the use and determinants of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany this study provides comprehensive data. METHODS: We obtained data from a rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04692-1 |
_version_ | 1784713224151629824 |
---|---|
author | Mayer, Johanna Brandstetter, Susanne Tischer, Christina Seelbach-Göbel, Birgit Malfertheiner, Sara Fill Melter, Michael Kabesch, Michael Apfelbacher, Christian |
author_facet | Mayer, Johanna Brandstetter, Susanne Tischer, Christina Seelbach-Göbel, Birgit Malfertheiner, Sara Fill Melter, Michael Kabesch, Michael Apfelbacher, Christian |
author_sort | Mayer, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Appropriate health system utilisation during pregnancy is fundamental for maintaining maternal and child’s health. To study the use and determinants of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany this study provides comprehensive data. METHODS: We obtained data from a recently established prospective German birth cohort study, the KUNO Kids Health Study. Analyses are based on Andersen’s Behavioural Model of health system use, which distinguishes between predisposing (e.g. country of birth), enabling (e.g. health insurance) and need factors (e.g. at-risk pregnancy). We examined bi- and multivariate association with the use of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics using logistic regression. RESULTS: The study has a sample size of 1886 participating mothers. One fifth of the mothers investigated did not use any supplementary prenatal screening or diagnostics. Notably, the chance of using supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics more than doubled if the pregnant woman had a private health insurance (OR 2.336; 95% CI 1.527–3.573). Higher maternal age (OR 1.038; 95% CI 1.006–1.071) and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (OR 1.465 95% CI 1.071–2.004) increased the use of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics. However, regarding need factors only having an at-risk-pregnancy (OR 1.688; 95% CI 1.271–2.241) showed an independent association. CONCLUSION: The important role of the type of health insurance and the relatively small influence of need factors was surprising. Especially with respect to equity in accessing health care, this needs further attention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04692-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9131677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91316772022-05-26 Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study Mayer, Johanna Brandstetter, Susanne Tischer, Christina Seelbach-Göbel, Birgit Malfertheiner, Sara Fill Melter, Michael Kabesch, Michael Apfelbacher, Christian BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Appropriate health system utilisation during pregnancy is fundamental for maintaining maternal and child’s health. To study the use and determinants of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany this study provides comprehensive data. METHODS: We obtained data from a recently established prospective German birth cohort study, the KUNO Kids Health Study. Analyses are based on Andersen’s Behavioural Model of health system use, which distinguishes between predisposing (e.g. country of birth), enabling (e.g. health insurance) and need factors (e.g. at-risk pregnancy). We examined bi- and multivariate association with the use of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics using logistic regression. RESULTS: The study has a sample size of 1886 participating mothers. One fifth of the mothers investigated did not use any supplementary prenatal screening or diagnostics. Notably, the chance of using supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics more than doubled if the pregnant woman had a private health insurance (OR 2.336; 95% CI 1.527–3.573). Higher maternal age (OR 1.038; 95% CI 1.006–1.071) and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (OR 1.465 95% CI 1.071–2.004) increased the use of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics. However, regarding need factors only having an at-risk-pregnancy (OR 1.688; 95% CI 1.271–2.241) showed an independent association. CONCLUSION: The important role of the type of health insurance and the relatively small influence of need factors was surprising. Especially with respect to equity in accessing health care, this needs further attention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04692-1. BioMed Central 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9131677/ /pubmed/35610584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04692-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mayer, Johanna Brandstetter, Susanne Tischer, Christina Seelbach-Göbel, Birgit Malfertheiner, Sara Fill Melter, Michael Kabesch, Michael Apfelbacher, Christian Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study |
title | Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study |
title_full | Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study |
title_fullStr | Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study |
title_short | Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study |
title_sort | utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in germany: cross-sectional study using data from the kuno kids health study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04692-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayerjohanna utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT brandstettersusanne utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT tischerchristina utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT seelbachgobelbirgit utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT malfertheinersarafill utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT meltermichael utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT kabeschmichael utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT apfelbacherchristian utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy AT utilisationofsupplementaryprenatalscreeninganddiagnosticsingermanycrosssectionalstudyusingdatafromthekunokidshealthstudy |