Cargando…

Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system

The 2018 revised International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging of cervical cancer has brought about a paradigm shift by offering the option of adding imaging and pathology to clinical staging. This makes it applicable to all types of resource situations across geographies wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bhatla, Neerja, Singhal, Seema, Dhamija, Ekta, Mathur, Sandeep, Natarajan, Jayashree, Maheshwari, Amita
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:	Review Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20

Ejemplares similares

Imaging in Carcinoma Cervix and Revised 2018 FIGO Staging System: Implications in Radiology Reporting
por: Dhamija, Ekta, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision
por: Olawaiye, Alexander B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications for Gynaecologic Cancer Care
por: Bhatla, Neerja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope
por: Natarajan, Jayashree, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cervical Cancer Prevention Efforts in India
por: Bhatla, Neerja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Vulvar Cancer: 2021 Revised FIGO Staging System and the Role of Imaging
por: Virarkar, Mayur, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Indications for endoscopy according to the revised FIGO staging for cervical cancer after MRI and CT scanning
por: Jeong, Bae Kwon, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification
por: Paik, E Sun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Critical analysis of the FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer
por: Tsuyoshi, Hideaki, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
por: Long, Xingtao, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri
por: Berek, Jonathan S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

FIGO Staging for Uterine Sarcomas: Can the Revised 2008 Staging System Predict Survival Outcome Better?
por: Yim, Ga Won, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Single visit approach for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection & loop electrosurgical excision procedure
por: Singla, Shilpa, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of Cervical Cancer for Stage III Patients with a Cohort from China
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
por: Machida, Hiroko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023
por: Berek, Jonathan S., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Early-Stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Predictors of survival
por: Upadhyay, Avinash, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prognostic Nomograms Predicting Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The First Nomogram Compared With Revised FIGO 2018 Staging System
por: Yang, Xi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

National screening programs for cervical cancer in Asian countries
por: Aoki, Eiko Saitoh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Utility of PET/CT Metabolic Parameters Measured Based on Fixed Percentage Threshold of SUVmax and Adaptive Iterative Algorithm in the New Revised FIGO Staging System for Stage III Cervical Cancer
por: Zhang, Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pretreatment risk factors for parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer
por: Yamazaki, Hiroyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Identifying selection criteria for non‐radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer
por: Kasamatsu, Takahiro, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Parametrial involvement and decreased survival of women with FIGO stage IIIC1 cervical cancer
por: Chang, Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
por: Ye, Yanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Meng, Qingyu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern
por: Dhamija, Ekta, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Expression of DKK1 in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma and Its Correlation with Wnt/β-catenin Signalling Pathway
por: Das, Abhijit, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
por: Chai, Yanlan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review
por: Qin, Fengying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Predictors of chemotherapy resistance & relapse in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
por: Singhal, Seema, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Construction of refined staging classification systems integrating FIGO/T‐categories and corpus uterine invasion for non‐metastatic cervical cancer
por: Huang, Xiao‐Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Improving Global Outcomes in Cervical Cancer: The Time Has Come for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging to Formally Incorporate Advanced Imaging
por: Jolly, Shruti, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

FIGO staging in ovarian carcinoma and histological subtypes
por: Kehoe, Sean
Publicado: (2020)

Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
por: Pedone Anchora, Luigi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

FIGO 2018 Staging for Cervical Cancer: Influence on Stage Distribution and Outcomes in the 3D-Image-Guided Brachytherapy Era
por: Tomizawa, Kento, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6nl8horchpc8acr979jro448i2