Cargando…
Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies
Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open route is the standard surgical procedure. There is level I evidence against the use of laparoscopic/robotic approach for radical hyst...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854431 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4240_20 |
_version_ | 1784713243287093248 |
---|---|
author | Poddar, Pabashi Maheshwari, Amita |
author_facet | Poddar, Pabashi Maheshwari, Amita |
author_sort | Poddar, Pabashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open route is the standard surgical procedure. There is level I evidence against the use of laparoscopic/robotic approach for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Emerging data support the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in carefully selected patients with early-stage disease. In locally advanced cervical cancer patients, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery yields inferior disease-free survival compared to definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, definitive concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced disease. Fertility preserving surgery is feasible in highly selected young patients. Role of less-radical surgical procedures in patients’ with low-stage disease with good prognostic factors is under evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9131770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91317702022-05-26 Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies Poddar, Pabashi Maheshwari, Amita Indian J Med Res Review Article Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open route is the standard surgical procedure. There is level I evidence against the use of laparoscopic/robotic approach for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Emerging data support the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in carefully selected patients with early-stage disease. In locally advanced cervical cancer patients, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery yields inferior disease-free survival compared to definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, definitive concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced disease. Fertility preserving surgery is feasible in highly selected young patients. Role of less-radical surgical procedures in patients’ with low-stage disease with good prognostic factors is under evaluation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9131770/ /pubmed/34854431 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4240_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Poddar, Pabashi Maheshwari, Amita Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
title | Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
title_full | Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
title_fullStr | Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
title_short | Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
title_sort | surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854431 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4240_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poddarpabashi surgeryforcervicalcancerconsensuscontroversies AT maheshwariamita surgeryforcervicalcancerconsensuscontroversies |