Cargando…
Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the 2017 8(th) TNM edition and the latest update in 2020 compared to the 7(th) in a large cohort of patients affected by oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), considering all stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort involved 300 pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35612505 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2055 |
_version_ | 1784713291365351424 |
---|---|
author | Tagliabue, Marta De Berardinis, Rita Belloni, Pietro Gandini, Sara Scaglione, Donatella Maffini, Fausto Mirabella, Rosolino Antonino Riccio, Stefano Gioacchino, Giugliano Bruschini, Roberto Chu, Francesco Ansarin, Mohssen |
author_facet | Tagliabue, Marta De Berardinis, Rita Belloni, Pietro Gandini, Sara Scaglione, Donatella Maffini, Fausto Mirabella, Rosolino Antonino Riccio, Stefano Gioacchino, Giugliano Bruschini, Roberto Chu, Francesco Ansarin, Mohssen |
author_sort | Tagliabue, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the 2017 8(th) TNM edition and the latest update in 2020 compared to the 7(th) in a large cohort of patients affected by oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), considering all stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort involved 300 patients affected by OTSCC treated with surgery. All cases were classified according to the 7(th), 8(th) (2017), and the latest updated TNM edition (October 2020),. Patients were grouped based on the shift in tumour (T) category, lymph nodal (N) category and final pathological stage. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. RESULTS: According to the 7(th) edition, multivariate analysis OS revealed that stage IV patients had an almost 4-fold risk of death compared to stage I (HR = 3.81 95% CI: 2.32-6.25; p < 0.001). Regarding DFS, stage IV patients had a 2-fold greater risk of relapses, or second primary, than patients in stage I (HR = 2.51 95% CI: 1.68-3.74; p < 0.001). According to 2017 8(th) edition for OS, stage IV patients presented a 5-fold higher risk of death compared to patients in stage I (HR = 5.18 95% CI: 2.96-9.08; p < 0.001) and almost 4-old greater risk of relapses or second primary compared to patients in stage I considering DFS (HR = 3.61 95% CI: 2.28-5.71; p < 0.001). Regarding the recent edition of 8(th) TNM (2020), stage IV patients had an almost 5-fold greater risk of death compared to patients in stage I considering OS (HR = 4.84 95% CI: 2.74-8.55; p < 0.001), while for DFS they had 3-fold greater risk of relapse or second primary compared to patients in stage I (HR = 3.13 95% CI: 1.99-4.91; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the recent update of the 8th edition of the TNM (2020) improves stratification and identification of advanced tumours, reducing the number of T3 compared to the 2017 edition and increasing the number of patients with pT4. This improvement made by the updated edition may reduce the risk of skipping adjuvant therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9131996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91319962022-06-01 Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system Tagliabue, Marta De Berardinis, Rita Belloni, Pietro Gandini, Sara Scaglione, Donatella Maffini, Fausto Mirabella, Rosolino Antonino Riccio, Stefano Gioacchino, Giugliano Bruschini, Roberto Chu, Francesco Ansarin, Mohssen Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Head and Neck BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the 2017 8(th) TNM edition and the latest update in 2020 compared to the 7(th) in a large cohort of patients affected by oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), considering all stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort involved 300 patients affected by OTSCC treated with surgery. All cases were classified according to the 7(th), 8(th) (2017), and the latest updated TNM edition (October 2020),. Patients were grouped based on the shift in tumour (T) category, lymph nodal (N) category and final pathological stage. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. RESULTS: According to the 7(th) edition, multivariate analysis OS revealed that stage IV patients had an almost 4-fold risk of death compared to stage I (HR = 3.81 95% CI: 2.32-6.25; p < 0.001). Regarding DFS, stage IV patients had a 2-fold greater risk of relapses, or second primary, than patients in stage I (HR = 2.51 95% CI: 1.68-3.74; p < 0.001). According to 2017 8(th) edition for OS, stage IV patients presented a 5-fold higher risk of death compared to patients in stage I (HR = 5.18 95% CI: 2.96-9.08; p < 0.001) and almost 4-old greater risk of relapses or second primary compared to patients in stage I considering DFS (HR = 3.61 95% CI: 2.28-5.71; p < 0.001). Regarding the recent edition of 8(th) TNM (2020), stage IV patients had an almost 5-fold greater risk of death compared to patients in stage I considering OS (HR = 4.84 95% CI: 2.74-8.55; p < 0.001), while for DFS they had 3-fold greater risk of relapse or second primary compared to patients in stage I (HR = 3.13 95% CI: 1.99-4.91; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the recent update of the 8th edition of the TNM (2020) improves stratification and identification of advanced tumours, reducing the number of T3 compared to the 2017 edition and increasing the number of patients with pT4. This improvement made by the updated edition may reduce the risk of skipping adjuvant therapy. Pacini Editore Srl 2022-05-16 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9131996/ /pubmed/35612505 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2055 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Tagliabue, Marta De Berardinis, Rita Belloni, Pietro Gandini, Sara Scaglione, Donatella Maffini, Fausto Mirabella, Rosolino Antonino Riccio, Stefano Gioacchino, Giugliano Bruschini, Roberto Chu, Francesco Ansarin, Mohssen Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system |
title | Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system |
title_full | Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system |
title_fullStr | Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system |
title_short | Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system |
title_sort | oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the ajcc/uicc tnm staging system |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9131996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35612505 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tagliabuemarta oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT deberardinisrita oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT bellonipietro oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT gandinisara oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT scaglionedonatella oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT maffinifausto oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT mirabellarosolinoantonino oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT ricciostefano oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT gioacchinogiugliano oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT bruschiniroberto oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT chufrancesco oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem AT ansarinmohssen oraltonguecarcinomaprognosticchangesaccordingtotheupdated2020versionoftheajccuicctnmstagingsystem |