Cargando…

Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus

Microplastic is a growing concern as an environmental contaminant as it is ubiquitous in our ecosystems. Microplastics are present in terrestrial environments, yet the majority of studies have focused on the adverse effects of microplastics on aquatic biota. We hypothesized that microplastic ingesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fudlosid, Serita, Ritchie, Marshall W., Muzzatti, Matthew J., Allison, Jane E., Provencher, Jennifer, MacMillan, Heath A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.871149
_version_ 1784713309373595648
author Fudlosid, Serita
Ritchie, Marshall W.
Muzzatti, Matthew J.
Allison, Jane E.
Provencher, Jennifer
MacMillan, Heath A.
author_facet Fudlosid, Serita
Ritchie, Marshall W.
Muzzatti, Matthew J.
Allison, Jane E.
Provencher, Jennifer
MacMillan, Heath A.
author_sort Fudlosid, Serita
collection PubMed
description Microplastic is a growing concern as an environmental contaminant as it is ubiquitous in our ecosystems. Microplastics are present in terrestrial environments, yet the majority of studies have focused on the adverse effects of microplastics on aquatic biota. We hypothesized that microplastic ingestion by a terrestrial insect would have localized effects on gut health and nutrient absorption, such that prolonged dietary microplastic exposure would impact growth rate and adult body size. We further hypothesized that plastic form (fibres vs. beads) would influence these effects because of the nature of gut-plastic interactions. Freshly hatched tropical house crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) were fed a standard diet containing different concentrations of either fluorescent polyethylene microplastic beads (75–105 μm), or untreated polyethylene terephthalate microfibers (< 5 mm) until they died or reached adulthood (approximately 8 weeks). Weight and body length were measured weekly and microplastic ingestion was confirmed through fluorescence microscopy and visual inspection of the frass. While, to our surprise, we found no effect of polyethylene bead ingestion on growth rate or final body size of G. sigillatus, females experienced a reduction in size and weight when fed high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers. These results suggest that high concentrations of polyethylene beads of the 100 μm size range can pass through the cricket gut without a substantial negative effect on their growth and development time, but high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers cannot. Although we report the negative effects of microplastic ingestion on the growth of G. sigillatus, it remains uncertain what threats microplastics pose to terrestrial insects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91320902022-05-26 Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus Fudlosid, Serita Ritchie, Marshall W. Muzzatti, Matthew J. Allison, Jane E. Provencher, Jennifer MacMillan, Heath A. Front Physiol Physiology Microplastic is a growing concern as an environmental contaminant as it is ubiquitous in our ecosystems. Microplastics are present in terrestrial environments, yet the majority of studies have focused on the adverse effects of microplastics on aquatic biota. We hypothesized that microplastic ingestion by a terrestrial insect would have localized effects on gut health and nutrient absorption, such that prolonged dietary microplastic exposure would impact growth rate and adult body size. We further hypothesized that plastic form (fibres vs. beads) would influence these effects because of the nature of gut-plastic interactions. Freshly hatched tropical house crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) were fed a standard diet containing different concentrations of either fluorescent polyethylene microplastic beads (75–105 μm), or untreated polyethylene terephthalate microfibers (< 5 mm) until they died or reached adulthood (approximately 8 weeks). Weight and body length were measured weekly and microplastic ingestion was confirmed through fluorescence microscopy and visual inspection of the frass. While, to our surprise, we found no effect of polyethylene bead ingestion on growth rate or final body size of G. sigillatus, females experienced a reduction in size and weight when fed high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers. These results suggest that high concentrations of polyethylene beads of the 100 μm size range can pass through the cricket gut without a substantial negative effect on their growth and development time, but high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers cannot. Although we report the negative effects of microplastic ingestion on the growth of G. sigillatus, it remains uncertain what threats microplastics pose to terrestrial insects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9132090/ /pubmed/35634147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.871149 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fudlosid, Ritchie, Muzzatti, Allison, Provencher and MacMillan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Fudlosid, Serita
Ritchie, Marshall W.
Muzzatti, Matthew J.
Allison, Jane E.
Provencher, Jennifer
MacMillan, Heath A.
Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
title Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
title_full Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
title_fullStr Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
title_full_unstemmed Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
title_short Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
title_sort ingestion of microplastic fibres, but not microplastic beads, impacts growth rates in the tropical house cricket gryllodes sigillatus
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.871149
work_keys_str_mv AT fudlosidserita ingestionofmicroplasticfibresbutnotmicroplasticbeadsimpactsgrowthratesinthetropicalhousecricketgryllodessigillatus
AT ritchiemarshallw ingestionofmicroplasticfibresbutnotmicroplasticbeadsimpactsgrowthratesinthetropicalhousecricketgryllodessigillatus
AT muzzattimatthewj ingestionofmicroplasticfibresbutnotmicroplasticbeadsimpactsgrowthratesinthetropicalhousecricketgryllodessigillatus
AT allisonjanee ingestionofmicroplasticfibresbutnotmicroplasticbeadsimpactsgrowthratesinthetropicalhousecricketgryllodessigillatus
AT provencherjennifer ingestionofmicroplasticfibresbutnotmicroplasticbeadsimpactsgrowthratesinthetropicalhousecricketgryllodessigillatus
AT macmillanheatha ingestionofmicroplasticfibresbutnotmicroplasticbeadsimpactsgrowthratesinthetropicalhousecricketgryllodessigillatus