Cargando…

The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model

BACKGROUND: Recently, the safety of repeated and lengthy anesthesia administration has been called into question, a subset of these animal studies demonstrated that anesthetics induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction. The BBB is critical in protecting the brain parenchyma from the surrounding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Jason M., Neese, Olivia R., Bieber, Dylan D., Lewis, Kirsten A., Ahmadi, Layla M., Parsons, Dustin W., Canfield, Scott G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.835649
_version_ 1784713324792905728
author Hughes, Jason M.
Neese, Olivia R.
Bieber, Dylan D.
Lewis, Kirsten A.
Ahmadi, Layla M.
Parsons, Dustin W.
Canfield, Scott G.
author_facet Hughes, Jason M.
Neese, Olivia R.
Bieber, Dylan D.
Lewis, Kirsten A.
Ahmadi, Layla M.
Parsons, Dustin W.
Canfield, Scott G.
author_sort Hughes, Jason M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, the safety of repeated and lengthy anesthesia administration has been called into question, a subset of these animal studies demonstrated that anesthetics induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction. The BBB is critical in protecting the brain parenchyma from the surrounding micro-vasculature. BBB breakdown and dysfunction has been observed in several neurodegenerative diseases and may contribute to both the initiation and the progression of the disease. In this study we utilize a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derived-BBB model, exhibiting near in vivo properties, to evaluate the effects of anesthetics on critical barrier properties. METHODS: iPSC-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) expressed near in vivo barrier tightness assessed by trans-endothelial electrical resistance and para-cellular permeability. Efflux transporter activity was determined by substrate transport in the presence of specific inhibitors. Trans-cellular transport was measured utilizing large fluorescently tagged dextran. Tight junction localization in BMECs was evaluated with fluorescent microscopy. The anesthetic, propofol was exposed to BMECs at varying durations and concentrations and BBB properties were monitored post-exposure. RESULTS: Following propofol exposure, BMECs displayed reduced resistance and increased permeability indicative of a leaky barrier. Reduced barrier tightness and the dysregulation of occludin, a tight junction protein, were partly the result of an elevation in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) levels. Efflux transporter activity and trans-cellular transport were unaffected by propofol exposure. Propofol induced barrier dysfunction was partially restored following matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we have demonstrated that propofol alters BBB integrity utilizing a human in vitro BBB model that displays key in vivo characteristics. A leaky BBB enables otherwise impermeable molecules such as pathogens and toxins the ability to reach vulnerable cell types of the brain parenchyma. A robust human in vitro BBB model will allow for the evaluation of several anesthetics at fluctuating clinical scenarios and to elucidate mechanisms with the goal of ultimately improving anesthesia safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91321762022-05-26 The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model Hughes, Jason M. Neese, Olivia R. Bieber, Dylan D. Lewis, Kirsten A. Ahmadi, Layla M. Parsons, Dustin W. Canfield, Scott G. Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Recently, the safety of repeated and lengthy anesthesia administration has been called into question, a subset of these animal studies demonstrated that anesthetics induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction. The BBB is critical in protecting the brain parenchyma from the surrounding micro-vasculature. BBB breakdown and dysfunction has been observed in several neurodegenerative diseases and may contribute to both the initiation and the progression of the disease. In this study we utilize a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derived-BBB model, exhibiting near in vivo properties, to evaluate the effects of anesthetics on critical barrier properties. METHODS: iPSC-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) expressed near in vivo barrier tightness assessed by trans-endothelial electrical resistance and para-cellular permeability. Efflux transporter activity was determined by substrate transport in the presence of specific inhibitors. Trans-cellular transport was measured utilizing large fluorescently tagged dextran. Tight junction localization in BMECs was evaluated with fluorescent microscopy. The anesthetic, propofol was exposed to BMECs at varying durations and concentrations and BBB properties were monitored post-exposure. RESULTS: Following propofol exposure, BMECs displayed reduced resistance and increased permeability indicative of a leaky barrier. Reduced barrier tightness and the dysregulation of occludin, a tight junction protein, were partly the result of an elevation in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) levels. Efflux transporter activity and trans-cellular transport were unaffected by propofol exposure. Propofol induced barrier dysfunction was partially restored following matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we have demonstrated that propofol alters BBB integrity utilizing a human in vitro BBB model that displays key in vivo characteristics. A leaky BBB enables otherwise impermeable molecules such as pathogens and toxins the ability to reach vulnerable cell types of the brain parenchyma. A robust human in vitro BBB model will allow for the evaluation of several anesthetics at fluctuating clinical scenarios and to elucidate mechanisms with the goal of ultimately improving anesthesia safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9132176/ /pubmed/35634467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.835649 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hughes, Neese, Bieber, Lewis, Ahmadi, Parsons and Canfield. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hughes, Jason M.
Neese, Olivia R.
Bieber, Dylan D.
Lewis, Kirsten A.
Ahmadi, Layla M.
Parsons, Dustin W.
Canfield, Scott G.
The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model
title The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model
title_full The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model
title_fullStr The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model
title_short The Effects of Propofol on a Human in vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model
title_sort effects of propofol on a human in vitro blood-brain barrier model
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.835649
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesjasonm theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT neeseoliviar theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT bieberdyland theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT lewiskirstena theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT ahmadilaylam theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT parsonsdustinw theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT canfieldscottg theeffectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT hughesjasonm effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT neeseoliviar effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT bieberdyland effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT lewiskirstena effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT ahmadilaylam effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT parsonsdustinw effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel
AT canfieldscottg effectsofpropofolonahumaninvitrobloodbrainbarriermodel