Cargando…
Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
BACKGROUND: Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-ef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268948 |
_version_ | 1784713357795786752 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Yong Yi Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Chatterton, Mary Lou Fletcher, Susan L. Chondros, Patty Densley, Konstancja Murray, Elizabeth Dowrick, Christopher Coe, Amy Hegarty, Kelsey L. Davidson, Sandra K. Wachtler, Caroline Palmer, Victoria J. Gunn, Jane M. |
author_facet | Lee, Yong Yi Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Chatterton, Mary Lou Fletcher, Susan L. Chondros, Patty Densley, Konstancja Murray, Elizabeth Dowrick, Christopher Coe, Amy Hegarty, Kelsey L. Davidson, Sandra K. Wachtler, Caroline Palmer, Victoria J. Gunn, Jane M. |
author_sort | Lee, Yong Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9132336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91323362022-05-26 Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis Lee, Yong Yi Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Chatterton, Mary Lou Fletcher, Susan L. Chondros, Patty Densley, Konstancja Murray, Elizabeth Dowrick, Christopher Coe, Amy Hegarty, Kelsey L. Davidson, Sandra K. Wachtler, Caroline Palmer, Victoria J. Gunn, Jane M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459). Public Library of Science 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9132336/ /pubmed/35613149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268948 Text en © 2022 Lee et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Yong Yi Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Chatterton, Mary Lou Fletcher, Susan L. Chondros, Patty Densley, Konstancja Murray, Elizabeth Dowrick, Christopher Coe, Amy Hegarty, Kelsey L. Davidson, Sandra K. Wachtler, Caroline Palmer, Victoria J. Gunn, Jane M. Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis |
title | Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis |
title_full | Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis |
title_short | Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis |
title_sort | economic evaluation of the target-d platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: a within-trial cost-utility analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeyongyi economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT mihalopouloscathrine economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT chattertonmarylou economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT fletchersusanl economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT chondrospatty economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT densleykonstancja economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT murrayelizabeth economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT dowrickchristopher economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT coeamy economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT hegartykelseyl economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT davidsonsandrak economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT wachtlercaroline economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT palmervictoriaj economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis AT gunnjanem economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis |