Cargando…

Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis

BACKGROUND: Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Yong Yi, Mihalopoulos, Cathrine, Chatterton, Mary Lou, Fletcher, Susan L., Chondros, Patty, Densley, Konstancja, Murray, Elizabeth, Dowrick, Christopher, Coe, Amy, Hegarty, Kelsey L., Davidson, Sandra K., Wachtler, Caroline, Palmer, Victoria J., Gunn, Jane M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268948
_version_ 1784713357795786752
author Lee, Yong Yi
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Chatterton, Mary Lou
Fletcher, Susan L.
Chondros, Patty
Densley, Konstancja
Murray, Elizabeth
Dowrick, Christopher
Coe, Amy
Hegarty, Kelsey L.
Davidson, Sandra K.
Wachtler, Caroline
Palmer, Victoria J.
Gunn, Jane M.
author_facet Lee, Yong Yi
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Chatterton, Mary Lou
Fletcher, Susan L.
Chondros, Patty
Densley, Konstancja
Murray, Elizabeth
Dowrick, Christopher
Coe, Amy
Hegarty, Kelsey L.
Davidson, Sandra K.
Wachtler, Caroline
Palmer, Victoria J.
Gunn, Jane M.
author_sort Lee, Yong Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91323362022-05-26 Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis Lee, Yong Yi Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Chatterton, Mary Lou Fletcher, Susan L. Chondros, Patty Densley, Konstancja Murray, Elizabeth Dowrick, Christopher Coe, Amy Hegarty, Kelsey L. Davidson, Sandra K. Wachtler, Caroline Palmer, Victoria J. Gunn, Jane M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459). Public Library of Science 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9132336/ /pubmed/35613149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268948 Text en © 2022 Lee et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Yong Yi
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Chatterton, Mary Lou
Fletcher, Susan L.
Chondros, Patty
Densley, Konstancja
Murray, Elizabeth
Dowrick, Christopher
Coe, Amy
Hegarty, Kelsey L.
Davidson, Sandra K.
Wachtler, Caroline
Palmer, Victoria J.
Gunn, Jane M.
Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
title Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
title_full Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
title_short Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis
title_sort economic evaluation of the target-d platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: a within-trial cost-utility analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268948
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyongyi economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT mihalopouloscathrine economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT chattertonmarylou economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT fletchersusanl economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT chondrospatty economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT densleykonstancja economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT murrayelizabeth economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT dowrickchristopher economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT coeamy economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT hegartykelseyl economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT davidsonsandrak economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT wachtlercaroline economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT palmervictoriaj economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis
AT gunnjanem economicevaluationofthetargetdplatformtomatchdepressionmanagementtoseverityprognosisinprimarycareawithintrialcostutilityanalysis