Cargando…

The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark

The study is a register-based cross-sectional study aiming to estimate the prevalence of treated osteoporosis in Greenland compared to Denmark and provide a description of the patients with osteoporosis in Greenland. In addition, the study estimates the incidence of hip fractures in Greenland from 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sten, Kira Amalie, Højgaard, Emma Elisabeth, Backe, Marie Balslev, Pedersen, Michael Lynge, Skovgaard, Nils, Andersen, Stig, Albertsen, Nadja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2022.2078473
_version_ 1784713370487750656
author Sten, Kira Amalie
Højgaard, Emma Elisabeth
Backe, Marie Balslev
Pedersen, Michael Lynge
Skovgaard, Nils
Andersen, Stig
Albertsen, Nadja
author_facet Sten, Kira Amalie
Højgaard, Emma Elisabeth
Backe, Marie Balslev
Pedersen, Michael Lynge
Skovgaard, Nils
Andersen, Stig
Albertsen, Nadja
author_sort Sten, Kira Amalie
collection PubMed
description The study is a register-based cross-sectional study aiming to estimate the prevalence of treated osteoporosis in Greenland compared to Denmark and provide a description of the patients with osteoporosis in Greenland. In addition, the study estimates the incidence of hip fractures in Greenland from 2018 to 2020 among people aged 65 years or older. The overall prevalence of patients prescribed medication for osteoporosis among those aged 18 years or older was 0.56% in Greenland and 2.36% in Denmark (p < 0.001). Among those aged 50 years or older, the prevalence was 1.28% and 4.71% in Greenland and Denmark, respectively (p < 0.001). The prevalence increased to 3.41% and 11.18% among patients aged 80 years or older in Greenland and Denmark, respectively. The incidence of hip fractures in Greenland was 6.55 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2020 compared to 5.65 per 1,000 inhabitants in Denmark (NS). In conclusion, the prevalence of treated osteoporosis in Greenland was less than one in four of that of Denmark. The incidence of hip fractures was similar in Greenland than in Denmark. Hence, our findings suggest that a marked number of subjects with osteoporosis in Greenland go untreated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91323992022-05-26 The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark Sten, Kira Amalie Højgaard, Emma Elisabeth Backe, Marie Balslev Pedersen, Michael Lynge Skovgaard, Nils Andersen, Stig Albertsen, Nadja Int J Circumpolar Health Original Research Article The study is a register-based cross-sectional study aiming to estimate the prevalence of treated osteoporosis in Greenland compared to Denmark and provide a description of the patients with osteoporosis in Greenland. In addition, the study estimates the incidence of hip fractures in Greenland from 2018 to 2020 among people aged 65 years or older. The overall prevalence of patients prescribed medication for osteoporosis among those aged 18 years or older was 0.56% in Greenland and 2.36% in Denmark (p < 0.001). Among those aged 50 years or older, the prevalence was 1.28% and 4.71% in Greenland and Denmark, respectively (p < 0.001). The prevalence increased to 3.41% and 11.18% among patients aged 80 years or older in Greenland and Denmark, respectively. The incidence of hip fractures in Greenland was 6.55 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2020 compared to 5.65 per 1,000 inhabitants in Denmark (NS). In conclusion, the prevalence of treated osteoporosis in Greenland was less than one in four of that of Denmark. The incidence of hip fractures was similar in Greenland than in Denmark. Hence, our findings suggest that a marked number of subjects with osteoporosis in Greenland go untreated. Taylor & Francis 2022-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9132399/ /pubmed/35603589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2022.2078473 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sten, Kira Amalie
Højgaard, Emma Elisabeth
Backe, Marie Balslev
Pedersen, Michael Lynge
Skovgaard, Nils
Andersen, Stig
Albertsen, Nadja
The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark
title The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark
title_full The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark
title_fullStr The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark
title_short The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark
title_sort prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in greenland is low compared to denmark
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2022.2078473
work_keys_str_mv AT stenkiraamalie theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT højgaardemmaelisabeth theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT backemariebalslev theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT pedersenmichaellynge theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT skovgaardnils theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT andersenstig theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT albertsennadja theprevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT stenkiraamalie prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT højgaardemmaelisabeth prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT backemariebalslev prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT pedersenmichaellynge prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT skovgaardnils prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT andersenstig prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark
AT albertsennadja prevalenceofpatientstreatedforosteoporosisingreenlandislowcomparedtodenmark