Cargando…

Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes

BACKGROUND: Health services interventions are typically more effective in randomised controlled trials than in routine healthcare. One explanation for this ‘voltage drop', i.e. reduction in effectiveness, is a reduction in intervention fidelity, i.e. the extent to which a programme is implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawkes, Rhiannon E., Miles, Lisa M., Bower, Peter, Cotterill, Sarah, French, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2077205
_version_ 1784713372730654720
author Hawkes, Rhiannon E.
Miles, Lisa M.
Bower, Peter
Cotterill, Sarah
French, David P.
author_facet Hawkes, Rhiannon E.
Miles, Lisa M.
Bower, Peter
Cotterill, Sarah
French, David P.
author_sort Hawkes, Rhiannon E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health services interventions are typically more effective in randomised controlled trials than in routine healthcare. One explanation for this ‘voltage drop', i.e. reduction in effectiveness, is a reduction in intervention fidelity, i.e. the extent to which a programme is implemented as intended. This article discusses how to optimise intervention fidelity in nationally implemented behaviour change programmes, using as an exemplar the National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP); a behaviour change intervention for adults in England at increased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, delivered by four independent provider organisations. We summarise key findings from a thorough fidelity evaluation of the NHS-DPP assessing design (whether programme plans were in accordance with the evidence base), training (of staff to deliver key intervention components), delivery (of key intervention components), receipt (participant understanding of intervention content), and highlight lessons learned for the implementation of other large-scale programmes. RESULTS: NHS-DPP providers delivered the majority of behaviour change content specified in their programme designs. However, a drift in fidelity was apparent at multiple points: from the evidence base, during programme commissioning, and on to providers’ programme designs. A lack of clear theoretical rationale for the intervention contents was apparent in design, training, and delivery. Our evaluation suggests that many fidelity issues may have been less prevalent if there was a clear underpinning theory from the outset. CONCLUSION: We provide recommendations to enhance fidelity of nationally implemented behaviour change programmes. The involvement of a behaviour change specialist in clarifying the theory of change would minimise drift of key intervention content. Further, as loss of fidelity appears notable at the design stage, this should be given particular attention. Based on these recommendations, we describe examples of how we have worked with commissioners of the NHS-DPP to enhance fidelity of the next roll-out of the programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91324102022-05-26 Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes Hawkes, Rhiannon E. Miles, Lisa M. Bower, Peter Cotterill, Sarah French, David P. Health Psychol Behav Med Review BACKGROUND: Health services interventions are typically more effective in randomised controlled trials than in routine healthcare. One explanation for this ‘voltage drop', i.e. reduction in effectiveness, is a reduction in intervention fidelity, i.e. the extent to which a programme is implemented as intended. This article discusses how to optimise intervention fidelity in nationally implemented behaviour change programmes, using as an exemplar the National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP); a behaviour change intervention for adults in England at increased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, delivered by four independent provider organisations. We summarise key findings from a thorough fidelity evaluation of the NHS-DPP assessing design (whether programme plans were in accordance with the evidence base), training (of staff to deliver key intervention components), delivery (of key intervention components), receipt (participant understanding of intervention content), and highlight lessons learned for the implementation of other large-scale programmes. RESULTS: NHS-DPP providers delivered the majority of behaviour change content specified in their programme designs. However, a drift in fidelity was apparent at multiple points: from the evidence base, during programme commissioning, and on to providers’ programme designs. A lack of clear theoretical rationale for the intervention contents was apparent in design, training, and delivery. Our evaluation suggests that many fidelity issues may have been less prevalent if there was a clear underpinning theory from the outset. CONCLUSION: We provide recommendations to enhance fidelity of nationally implemented behaviour change programmes. The involvement of a behaviour change specialist in clarifying the theory of change would minimise drift of key intervention content. Further, as loss of fidelity appears notable at the design stage, this should be given particular attention. Based on these recommendations, we describe examples of how we have worked with commissioners of the NHS-DPP to enhance fidelity of the next roll-out of the programme. Routledge 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9132410/ /pubmed/35646476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2077205 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Hawkes, Rhiannon E.
Miles, Lisa M.
Bower, Peter
Cotterill, Sarah
French, David P.
Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
title Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
title_full Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
title_fullStr Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
title_short Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
title_sort assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented english nhs diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2077205
work_keys_str_mv AT hawkesrhiannone assessingandensuringfidelityofthenationallyimplementedenglishnhsdiabetespreventionprogrammelessonslearnedfortheimplementationoflargescalebehaviourchangeprogrammes
AT mileslisam assessingandensuringfidelityofthenationallyimplementedenglishnhsdiabetespreventionprogrammelessonslearnedfortheimplementationoflargescalebehaviourchangeprogrammes
AT bowerpeter assessingandensuringfidelityofthenationallyimplementedenglishnhsdiabetespreventionprogrammelessonslearnedfortheimplementationoflargescalebehaviourchangeprogrammes
AT cotterillsarah assessingandensuringfidelityofthenationallyimplementedenglishnhsdiabetespreventionprogrammelessonslearnedfortheimplementationoflargescalebehaviourchangeprogrammes
AT frenchdavidp assessingandensuringfidelityofthenationallyimplementedenglishnhsdiabetespreventionprogrammelessonslearnedfortheimplementationoflargescalebehaviourchangeprogrammes