Cargando…

Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence

INTRODUCTION: Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a well-known treatment for functional anorectal disorders. The effect of BFT was monitored in fecal incontinence (FI) patients with the Fecobionics test and with the conventional technologies, anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Futaba, Kaori, Chen, Ssu-Chi, Leung, Wing Wa, Wong, Cherry, Mak, Tony, Ng, Simon, Gregersen, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363631
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000491
_version_ 1784713397323956224
author Futaba, Kaori
Chen, Ssu-Chi
Leung, Wing Wa
Wong, Cherry
Mak, Tony
Ng, Simon
Gregersen, Hans
author_facet Futaba, Kaori
Chen, Ssu-Chi
Leung, Wing Wa
Wong, Cherry
Mak, Tony
Ng, Simon
Gregersen, Hans
author_sort Futaba, Kaori
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a well-known treatment for functional anorectal disorders. The effect of BFT was monitored in fecal incontinence (FI) patients with the Fecobionics test and with the conventional technologies, anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). METHODS: Studies were performed in 12 patients before and after 8 weeks of biofeedback training. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score was obtained. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were measured before the bag was distended in the rectum until urge to defecate. Pressure recordings were made during Fecobionics evacuation. RESULTS: BFT resulted in 24% reduction in FISI scores (P < 0.01). Seven patients were characterized as responders. Anal pressures, the urge-to-defecate volume, and defecatory parameters did not change significantly during BFT. For ARM-BET, the maximum anal squeeze pressure, the urge-to-defecate volume, and the expulsion time were lower after BFT compared with those before BFT (P < 0.05). For Fecobionics, the change in urge volume (r = 0.74, P < 0.05) and the change in defecation index (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) were associated with the change in FISI score. None of the ARM-BET parameters were associated with the change in FISI score. It was studied whether any pre-BFT data could predict treatment success. The Fecobionics expulsion duration and the defecation index predicted the outcome (P < 0.05). The defecation index had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 72%. None of the ARM-BET parameters predicted the outcome (all P > 0.2). DISCUSSION: Fecobionics was used as a tool to monitor the effect of BFT and proved better than conventional technologies for monitoring and predicting the outcome in the FISI score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91325202022-05-26 Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence Futaba, Kaori Chen, Ssu-Chi Leung, Wing Wa Wong, Cherry Mak, Tony Ng, Simon Gregersen, Hans Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article INTRODUCTION: Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a well-known treatment for functional anorectal disorders. The effect of BFT was monitored in fecal incontinence (FI) patients with the Fecobionics test and with the conventional technologies, anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). METHODS: Studies were performed in 12 patients before and after 8 weeks of biofeedback training. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score was obtained. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were measured before the bag was distended in the rectum until urge to defecate. Pressure recordings were made during Fecobionics evacuation. RESULTS: BFT resulted in 24% reduction in FISI scores (P < 0.01). Seven patients were characterized as responders. Anal pressures, the urge-to-defecate volume, and defecatory parameters did not change significantly during BFT. For ARM-BET, the maximum anal squeeze pressure, the urge-to-defecate volume, and the expulsion time were lower after BFT compared with those before BFT (P < 0.05). For Fecobionics, the change in urge volume (r = 0.74, P < 0.05) and the change in defecation index (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) were associated with the change in FISI score. None of the ARM-BET parameters were associated with the change in FISI score. It was studied whether any pre-BFT data could predict treatment success. The Fecobionics expulsion duration and the defecation index predicted the outcome (P < 0.05). The defecation index had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 72%. None of the ARM-BET parameters predicted the outcome (all P > 0.2). DISCUSSION: Fecobionics was used as a tool to monitor the effect of BFT and proved better than conventional technologies for monitoring and predicting the outcome in the FISI score. Wolters Kluwer 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9132520/ /pubmed/35363631 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000491 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Futaba, Kaori
Chen, Ssu-Chi
Leung, Wing Wa
Wong, Cherry
Mak, Tony
Ng, Simon
Gregersen, Hans
Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
title Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
title_full Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
title_fullStr Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
title_short Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
title_sort fecobionics evaluation of biofeedback therapy in patients with fecal incontinence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363631
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000491
work_keys_str_mv AT futabakaori fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence
AT chenssuchi fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence
AT leungwingwa fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence
AT wongcherry fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence
AT maktony fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence
AT ngsimon fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence
AT gregersenhans fecobionicsevaluationofbiofeedbacktherapyinpatientswithfecalincontinence