Cargando…

The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND: External cues are effective in improving gait in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the most effective cueing method has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effects of using visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues on their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suputtitada, Areerat, Chen, Carl P. C., Pongmala, Chatkaew, Sriyudthsak, Mana, Wilhelm, Agnes, Somboon, Pakpum, Janssen, Jessie, Richards, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7360414
_version_ 1784713435399847936
author Suputtitada, Areerat
Chen, Carl P. C.
Pongmala, Chatkaew
Sriyudthsak, Mana
Wilhelm, Agnes
Somboon, Pakpum
Janssen, Jessie
Richards, Jim
author_facet Suputtitada, Areerat
Chen, Carl P. C.
Pongmala, Chatkaew
Sriyudthsak, Mana
Wilhelm, Agnes
Somboon, Pakpum
Janssen, Jessie
Richards, Jim
author_sort Suputtitada, Areerat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: External cues are effective in improving gait in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the most effective cueing method has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effects of using visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues on their own or in combination during walking compared to no cues in people with PD. METHODS: This was a single blinded, randomly selected, controlled study. Twenty people with PD with an age range of 46–79 years and Hoehn and Yahr scores of 1–3 were recruited. Participants were studied under 4 cueing conditions; no cue, visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues, which were randomly selected individually or in a combination. RESULTS: A repeated measures ANOVA with pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction showed that any single or combination of the cues resulted in an improvement in gait velocity and stride length compared to no cue. Some significant differences were also seen when comparing different combinations of cues, specifically stride length showed significant improvements when additional cues were added to the light cue. The statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Walking using visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues can immediately improve gait mobility in people with PD. Any or a combination of the cues tested could be chosen depending on the ability of the individual to use that cue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91326932022-05-26 The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease Suputtitada, Areerat Chen, Carl P. C. Pongmala, Chatkaew Sriyudthsak, Mana Wilhelm, Agnes Somboon, Pakpum Janssen, Jessie Richards, Jim Parkinsons Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: External cues are effective in improving gait in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the most effective cueing method has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effects of using visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues on their own or in combination during walking compared to no cues in people with PD. METHODS: This was a single blinded, randomly selected, controlled study. Twenty people with PD with an age range of 46–79 years and Hoehn and Yahr scores of 1–3 were recruited. Participants were studied under 4 cueing conditions; no cue, visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues, which were randomly selected individually or in a combination. RESULTS: A repeated measures ANOVA with pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction showed that any single or combination of the cues resulted in an improvement in gait velocity and stride length compared to no cue. Some significant differences were also seen when comparing different combinations of cues, specifically stride length showed significant improvements when additional cues were added to the light cue. The statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Walking using visual, auditory, or somatosensory cues can immediately improve gait mobility in people with PD. Any or a combination of the cues tested could be chosen depending on the ability of the individual to use that cue. Hindawi 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9132693/ /pubmed/35634541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7360414 Text en Copyright © 2022 Areerat Suputtitada et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suputtitada, Areerat
Chen, Carl P. C.
Pongmala, Chatkaew
Sriyudthsak, Mana
Wilhelm, Agnes
Somboon, Pakpum
Janssen, Jessie
Richards, Jim
The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
title The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
title_full The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
title_fullStr The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
title_short The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
title_sort efficacy of a newly developed cueing device for gait mobility in parkinson's disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7360414
work_keys_str_mv AT suputtitadaareerat theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT chencarlpc theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT pongmalachatkaew theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT sriyudthsakmana theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT wilhelmagnes theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT somboonpakpum theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT janssenjessie theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT richardsjim theefficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT suputtitadaareerat efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT chencarlpc efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT pongmalachatkaew efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT sriyudthsakmana efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT wilhelmagnes efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT somboonpakpum efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT janssenjessie efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease
AT richardsjim efficacyofanewlydevelopedcueingdeviceforgaitmobilityinparkinsonsdisease