Cargando…

The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities

BACKGROUND: WHO core components for infection prevention and control (IPC) are important building blocks for effective IPC programmes. To our knowledge, we did the first WHO global survey to assess implementation of these programmes in health-care facilities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomczyk, Sara, Twyman, Anthony, de Kraker, Marlieke E A, Coutinho Rehse, Ana Paula, Tartari, Ermira, Toledo, João Paulo, Cassini, Alessandro, Pittet, Didier, Allegranzi, Benedetta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00809-4
_version_ 1784713452662554624
author Tomczyk, Sara
Twyman, Anthony
de Kraker, Marlieke E A
Coutinho Rehse, Ana Paula
Tartari, Ermira
Toledo, João Paulo
Cassini, Alessandro
Pittet, Didier
Allegranzi, Benedetta
author_facet Tomczyk, Sara
Twyman, Anthony
de Kraker, Marlieke E A
Coutinho Rehse, Ana Paula
Tartari, Ermira
Toledo, João Paulo
Cassini, Alessandro
Pittet, Didier
Allegranzi, Benedetta
author_sort Tomczyk, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: WHO core components for infection prevention and control (IPC) are important building blocks for effective IPC programmes. To our knowledge, we did the first WHO global survey to assess implementation of these programmes in health-care facilities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, IPC professionals were invited through global outreach and national coordinated efforts to complete the online WHO IPC assessment framework (IPCAF). The survey was created in English and was then translated into ten languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, and Thai. Post-stratification weighting was applied and countries with low response rates were excluded to improve representativeness. Weighted median scores and IQRs as well as weighted proportions (Nw) meeting defined IPCAF minimum requirements were reported. Indicators associated with the IPCAF score were assessed using a generalised estimating equation. FINDINGS: From Jan 16 to Dec 31, 2019, 4440 responses were received from 81 countries. The overall weighted IPCAF median score indicated an advanced level of implementation (605, IQR 450·4–705·0), but significantly lower scores were found in low-income (385, 279·7–442·9) and lower-middle-income countries (500·4, 345·0–657·5), and public facilities (515, 385–637·8). Core component 8 (built environment; 90·0, IQR 75·0–100·0) and core component 2 (guidelines; 87·5, 70·0–97·5) scored the highest, and core component 7 (workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; 70·0, 50–90) and core component 3 (education and training; 70 ·0, 50·0–85·0) scored the lowest. Overall, only 15·2% (Nw: 588 of 3873) of facilities met all IPCAF minimum requirements, ranging from 0% (0 of 417) in low-income countries to 25·6% (278 of 1087) in primary facilities, 9% (24 of 268) in secondary facilities, and 19% (18 of 95) in tertiary facilities in high-income countries. INTERPRETATION: Despite an overall high IPCAF score globally, important gaps in IPC facility implementation and core components across income levels hinder IPC progress. Increased support for more effective and sustainable IPC programmes is crucial to reduce risks posed by outbreaks to global health security and to ensure patient and health worker safety. FUNDING: WHO and the Infection Control Programme, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine. TRANSLATIONS: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91327752022-06-14 The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities Tomczyk, Sara Twyman, Anthony de Kraker, Marlieke E A Coutinho Rehse, Ana Paula Tartari, Ermira Toledo, João Paulo Cassini, Alessandro Pittet, Didier Allegranzi, Benedetta Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: WHO core components for infection prevention and control (IPC) are important building blocks for effective IPC programmes. To our knowledge, we did the first WHO global survey to assess implementation of these programmes in health-care facilities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, IPC professionals were invited through global outreach and national coordinated efforts to complete the online WHO IPC assessment framework (IPCAF). The survey was created in English and was then translated into ten languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, and Thai. Post-stratification weighting was applied and countries with low response rates were excluded to improve representativeness. Weighted median scores and IQRs as well as weighted proportions (Nw) meeting defined IPCAF minimum requirements were reported. Indicators associated with the IPCAF score were assessed using a generalised estimating equation. FINDINGS: From Jan 16 to Dec 31, 2019, 4440 responses were received from 81 countries. The overall weighted IPCAF median score indicated an advanced level of implementation (605, IQR 450·4–705·0), but significantly lower scores were found in low-income (385, 279·7–442·9) and lower-middle-income countries (500·4, 345·0–657·5), and public facilities (515, 385–637·8). Core component 8 (built environment; 90·0, IQR 75·0–100·0) and core component 2 (guidelines; 87·5, 70·0–97·5) scored the highest, and core component 7 (workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; 70·0, 50–90) and core component 3 (education and training; 70 ·0, 50·0–85·0) scored the lowest. Overall, only 15·2% (Nw: 588 of 3873) of facilities met all IPCAF minimum requirements, ranging from 0% (0 of 417) in low-income countries to 25·6% (278 of 1087) in primary facilities, 9% (24 of 268) in secondary facilities, and 19% (18 of 95) in tertiary facilities in high-income countries. INTERPRETATION: Despite an overall high IPCAF score globally, important gaps in IPC facility implementation and core components across income levels hinder IPC progress. Increased support for more effective and sustainable IPC programmes is crucial to reduce risks posed by outbreaks to global health security and to ensure patient and health worker safety. FUNDING: WHO and the Infection Control Programme, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine. TRANSLATIONS: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9132775/ /pubmed/35202599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00809-4 Text en © 2022 World Health Organization https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Tomczyk, Sara
Twyman, Anthony
de Kraker, Marlieke E A
Coutinho Rehse, Ana Paula
Tartari, Ermira
Toledo, João Paulo
Cassini, Alessandro
Pittet, Didier
Allegranzi, Benedetta
The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
title The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
title_full The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
title_fullStr The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
title_full_unstemmed The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
title_short The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
title_sort first who global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00809-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tomczyksara thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT twymananthony thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT dekrakermarliekeea thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT coutinhorehseanapaula thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT tartariermira thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT toledojoaopaulo thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT cassinialessandro thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT pittetdidier thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT allegranzibenedetta thefirstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT tomczyksara firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT twymananthony firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT dekrakermarliekeea firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT coutinhorehseanapaula firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT tartariermira firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT toledojoaopaulo firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT cassinialessandro firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT pittetdidier firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities
AT allegranzibenedetta firstwhoglobalsurveyoninfectionpreventionandcontrolinhealthcarefacilities