Cargando…

Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation

PURPOSE: To investigate whether Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) simultaneously applied on the quadriceps (Q) and gluteal (G) muscles, as compared to single Q-stimulation alters the knee extensor force production and discomfort. METHODS: A total of 11 healthy participants (6 females), wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flodin, J., Mikkelsen, C., Ackermann, P. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04949-9
_version_ 1784713467234615296
author Flodin, J.
Mikkelsen, C.
Ackermann, P. W.
author_facet Flodin, J.
Mikkelsen, C.
Ackermann, P. W.
author_sort Flodin, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate whether Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) simultaneously applied on the quadriceps (Q) and gluteal (G) muscles, as compared to single Q-stimulation alters the knee extensor force production and discomfort. METHODS: A total of 11 healthy participants (6 females), with normal weight and age between 19 and 54 years were included. The unilateral, isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was assessed for each participant in an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex, system 3). NMES was, in a randomized order, applied only on the Q-muscle and on the Q- and G-muscles (QG) simultaneously. NMES-intensity was increased stepwise until the maximal tolerable level was reached regarding discomfort, graded according to the visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS and the % of MVC produced by NMES, were registered for each level, expressed as median (inter-quartile range). RESULTS: The maximum tolerated NMES-intensity applied on Q compared to QG resulted in equally high discomfort, 8.0 (6.0–9.0) vs 8.0 (6.3–9.0), and in equivalent knee extensor force production, 36.7 (29.9–47.5) and 36.2 (28.9–49.3), respectively, in % of MVC. At 20% of MVC, NMES applied on Q compared to QG resulted in equal acceptable discomfort, 3.0 (2.0–4.5) vs 3.0 (3–5.5), and comparable intensity levels, 41.5 (38.0–45.8) vs 43.5 (37.0–48.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous QG-NMES, as compared to single Q-NMES, does not seem to affect the knee extensor force production or discomfort. Q-NMES, without voluntary muscle contraction, can with an acceptable level of discomfort result in at least 20% of MVC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91328422022-05-27 Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation Flodin, J. Mikkelsen, C. Ackermann, P. W. Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate whether Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) simultaneously applied on the quadriceps (Q) and gluteal (G) muscles, as compared to single Q-stimulation alters the knee extensor force production and discomfort. METHODS: A total of 11 healthy participants (6 females), with normal weight and age between 19 and 54 years were included. The unilateral, isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was assessed for each participant in an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex, system 3). NMES was, in a randomized order, applied only on the Q-muscle and on the Q- and G-muscles (QG) simultaneously. NMES-intensity was increased stepwise until the maximal tolerable level was reached regarding discomfort, graded according to the visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS and the % of MVC produced by NMES, were registered for each level, expressed as median (inter-quartile range). RESULTS: The maximum tolerated NMES-intensity applied on Q compared to QG resulted in equally high discomfort, 8.0 (6.0–9.0) vs 8.0 (6.3–9.0), and in equivalent knee extensor force production, 36.7 (29.9–47.5) and 36.2 (28.9–49.3), respectively, in % of MVC. At 20% of MVC, NMES applied on Q compared to QG resulted in equal acceptable discomfort, 3.0 (2.0–4.5) vs 3.0 (3–5.5), and comparable intensity levels, 41.5 (38.0–45.8) vs 43.5 (37.0–48.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous QG-NMES, as compared to single Q-NMES, does not seem to affect the knee extensor force production or discomfort. Q-NMES, without voluntary muscle contraction, can with an acceptable level of discomfort result in at least 20% of MVC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9132842/ /pubmed/35426510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04949-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Flodin, J.
Mikkelsen, C.
Ackermann, P. W.
Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
title Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
title_full Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
title_fullStr Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
title_short Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
title_sort knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04949-9
work_keys_str_mv AT flodinj kneeextensorforceproductionanddiscomfortduringneuromuscularelectricalstimulationofquadricepswithandwithoutglutealmusclecostimulation
AT mikkelsenc kneeextensorforceproductionanddiscomfortduringneuromuscularelectricalstimulationofquadricepswithandwithoutglutealmusclecostimulation
AT ackermannpw kneeextensorforceproductionanddiscomfortduringneuromuscularelectricalstimulationofquadricepswithandwithoutglutealmusclecostimulation