Cargando…

Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix

Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Q., Gorter, W. S., Vermolen, F. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3
_version_ 1784713475339059200
author Peng, Q.
Gorter, W. S.
Vermolen, F. J.
author_facet Peng, Q.
Gorter, W. S.
Vermolen, F. J.
author_sort Peng, Q.
collection PubMed
description Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9132877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91328772022-05-27 Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix Peng, Q. Gorter, W. S. Vermolen, F. J. Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9132877/ /pubmed/35403944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Peng, Q.
Gorter, W. S.
Vermolen, F. J.
Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
title Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
title_full Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
title_fullStr Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
title_short Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
title_sort comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pengq comparisonbetweenaphenomenologicalapproachandamorphoelasticityapproachregardingthedisplacementofextracellularmatrix
AT gorterws comparisonbetweenaphenomenologicalapproachandamorphoelasticityapproachregardingthedisplacementofextracellularmatrix
AT vermolenfj comparisonbetweenaphenomenologicalapproachandamorphoelasticityapproachregardingthedisplacementofextracellularmatrix