Cargando…
An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
OBJECTIVE: Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863823 |
_version_ | 1784713589930590208 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Chaohua Cheng, Rongshan Jiang, Jian Dimitriou, Dimitris Wang, Huizhi Jiang, Ziang Tsai, Tsung-Yuan Cheng, Cheng-Kung |
author_facet | Fang, Chaohua Cheng, Rongshan Jiang, Jian Dimitriou, Dimitris Wang, Huizhi Jiang, Ziang Tsai, Tsung-Yuan Cheng, Cheng-Kung |
author_sort | Fang, Chaohua |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present study is to compare the graft preparation time and the biomechanical performance between an efficient needleless technique and the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: The time required to perform a complete suture on 20 hamstring tendons during ACLRs was measured. The grafts from one side were prepared using the needle stitching technique. The grafts from the other side used the needleless grasping suture technique. For the second part of the study, 12 fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons were divided into two groups using two techniques and were mounted in an electric tensile test system. Each group was pretensioned to 100 N to simulate the maximum initial graft tension. The suturing state of sutures and graft (intact and damaged) and the load-elongation curve were recorded for each group. A Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of the two groups. RESULTS: In operation, the needleless grasping suture technique group (19.8 ± 4.8, range: 13.5–32.9 s) was significantly faster (p < 0.05) than the needle stitching technique group (52.7 ± 12.7, range: 36.0–87.5 s). The state of sutures in each group was intact. The mean elongation was 11.75 ± 1.38 (range: 9.47–12.99) mm and 10.59 ± 1.02 (range: 9.12–11.76) mm in the needleless stitching technique group and the needle grasping suture technique group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the elongation between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The needleless grasping suture technique was a convenient and efficient method for graft preparation in ACLR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9133538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91335382022-05-27 An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fang, Chaohua Cheng, Rongshan Jiang, Jian Dimitriou, Dimitris Wang, Huizhi Jiang, Ziang Tsai, Tsung-Yuan Cheng, Cheng-Kung Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present study is to compare the graft preparation time and the biomechanical performance between an efficient needleless technique and the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: The time required to perform a complete suture on 20 hamstring tendons during ACLRs was measured. The grafts from one side were prepared using the needle stitching technique. The grafts from the other side used the needleless grasping suture technique. For the second part of the study, 12 fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons were divided into two groups using two techniques and were mounted in an electric tensile test system. Each group was pretensioned to 100 N to simulate the maximum initial graft tension. The suturing state of sutures and graft (intact and damaged) and the load-elongation curve were recorded for each group. A Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of the two groups. RESULTS: In operation, the needleless grasping suture technique group (19.8 ± 4.8, range: 13.5–32.9 s) was significantly faster (p < 0.05) than the needle stitching technique group (52.7 ± 12.7, range: 36.0–87.5 s). The state of sutures in each group was intact. The mean elongation was 11.75 ± 1.38 (range: 9.47–12.99) mm and 10.59 ± 1.02 (range: 9.12–11.76) mm in the needleless stitching technique group and the needle grasping suture technique group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the elongation between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The needleless grasping suture technique was a convenient and efficient method for graft preparation in ACLR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133538/ /pubmed/35647013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863823 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fang, Cheng, Jiang, Dimitriou, Wang, Jiang, Tsai and Cheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Fang, Chaohua Cheng, Rongshan Jiang, Jian Dimitriou, Dimitris Wang, Huizhi Jiang, Ziang Tsai, Tsung-Yuan Cheng, Cheng-Kung An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title | An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full | An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_short | An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_sort | efficient needleless grasping suture technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangchaohua anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT chengrongshan anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT jiangjian anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT dimitrioudimitris anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT wanghuizhi anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT jiangziang anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT tsaitsungyuan anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT chengchengkung anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT fangchaohua efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT chengrongshan efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT jiangjian efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT dimitrioudimitris efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT wanghuizhi efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT jiangziang efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT tsaitsungyuan efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT chengchengkung efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction |