Cargando…

An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Chaohua, Cheng, Rongshan, Jiang, Jian, Dimitriou, Dimitris, Wang, Huizhi, Jiang, Ziang, Tsai, Tsung-Yuan, Cheng, Cheng-Kung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863823
_version_ 1784713589930590208
author Fang, Chaohua
Cheng, Rongshan
Jiang, Jian
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Wang, Huizhi
Jiang, Ziang
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
Cheng, Cheng-Kung
author_facet Fang, Chaohua
Cheng, Rongshan
Jiang, Jian
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Wang, Huizhi
Jiang, Ziang
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
Cheng, Cheng-Kung
author_sort Fang, Chaohua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present study is to compare the graft preparation time and the biomechanical performance between an efficient needleless technique and the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: The time required to perform a complete suture on 20 hamstring tendons during ACLRs was measured. The grafts from one side were prepared using the needle stitching technique. The grafts from the other side used the needleless grasping suture technique. For the second part of the study, 12 fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons were divided into two groups using two techniques and were mounted in an electric tensile test system. Each group was pretensioned to 100 N to simulate the maximum initial graft tension. The suturing state of sutures and graft (intact and damaged) and the load-elongation curve were recorded for each group. A Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of the two groups. RESULTS: In operation, the needleless grasping suture technique group (19.8 ± 4.8, range: 13.5–32.9 s) was significantly faster (p < 0.05) than the needle stitching technique group (52.7 ± 12.7, range: 36.0–87.5 s). The state of sutures in each group was intact. The mean elongation was 11.75 ± 1.38 (range: 9.47–12.99) mm and 10.59 ± 1.02 (range: 9.12–11.76) mm in the needleless stitching technique group and the needle grasping suture technique group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the elongation between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The needleless grasping suture technique was a convenient and efficient method for graft preparation in ACLR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9133538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91335382022-05-27 An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fang, Chaohua Cheng, Rongshan Jiang, Jian Dimitriou, Dimitris Wang, Huizhi Jiang, Ziang Tsai, Tsung-Yuan Cheng, Cheng-Kung Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present study is to compare the graft preparation time and the biomechanical performance between an efficient needleless technique and the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: The time required to perform a complete suture on 20 hamstring tendons during ACLRs was measured. The grafts from one side were prepared using the needle stitching technique. The grafts from the other side used the needleless grasping suture technique. For the second part of the study, 12 fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons were divided into two groups using two techniques and were mounted in an electric tensile test system. Each group was pretensioned to 100 N to simulate the maximum initial graft tension. The suturing state of sutures and graft (intact and damaged) and the load-elongation curve were recorded for each group. A Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of the two groups. RESULTS: In operation, the needleless grasping suture technique group (19.8 ± 4.8, range: 13.5–32.9 s) was significantly faster (p < 0.05) than the needle stitching technique group (52.7 ± 12.7, range: 36.0–87.5 s). The state of sutures in each group was intact. The mean elongation was 11.75 ± 1.38 (range: 9.47–12.99) mm and 10.59 ± 1.02 (range: 9.12–11.76) mm in the needleless stitching technique group and the needle grasping suture technique group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the elongation between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The needleless grasping suture technique was a convenient and efficient method for graft preparation in ACLR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133538/ /pubmed/35647013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863823 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fang, Cheng, Jiang, Dimitriou, Wang, Jiang, Tsai and Cheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Fang, Chaohua
Cheng, Rongshan
Jiang, Jian
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Wang, Huizhi
Jiang, Ziang
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
Cheng, Cheng-Kung
An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort efficient needleless grasping suture technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863823
work_keys_str_mv AT fangchaohua anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT chengrongshan anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT jiangjian anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT dimitrioudimitris anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT wanghuizhi anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT jiangziang anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT tsaitsungyuan anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT chengchengkung anefficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT fangchaohua efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT chengrongshan efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT jiangjian efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT dimitrioudimitris efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT wanghuizhi efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT jiangziang efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT tsaitsungyuan efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT chengchengkung efficientneedlelessgraspingsuturetechniqueforgraftpreparationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction