Cargando…
The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This st...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.883210 |
_version_ | 1784713652886044672 |
---|---|
author | Aeschbacher, P. Kollár, A. Candinas, D. Beldi, G. Lachenmayer, A. |
author_facet | Aeschbacher, P. Kollár, A. Candinas, D. Beldi, G. Lachenmayer, A. |
author_sort | Aeschbacher, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection. METHODS: All patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9133808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91338082022-05-27 The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study Aeschbacher, P. Kollár, A. Candinas, D. Beldi, G. Lachenmayer, A. Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection. METHODS: All patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133808/ /pubmed/35647004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.883210 Text en Copyright © 2022 Aeschbacher, Kollàr, Candinas, Beldi and Lachenmayer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Aeschbacher, P. Kollár, A. Candinas, D. Beldi, G. Lachenmayer, A. The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study |
title | The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study |
title_full | The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study |
title_short | The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | role of surgical expertise and surgical access in retroperitoneal sarcoma resection – a retrospective study |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.883210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aeschbacherp theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT kollara theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT candinasd theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT beldig theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT lachenmayera theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT aeschbacherp roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT kollara roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT candinasd roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT beldig roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy AT lachenmayera roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy |