Cargando…

The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aeschbacher, P., Kollár, A., Candinas, D., Beldi, G., Lachenmayer, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.883210
_version_ 1784713652886044672
author Aeschbacher, P.
Kollár, A.
Candinas, D.
Beldi, G.
Lachenmayer, A.
author_facet Aeschbacher, P.
Kollár, A.
Candinas, D.
Beldi, G.
Lachenmayer, A.
author_sort Aeschbacher, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection. METHODS: All patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9133808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91338082022-05-27 The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study Aeschbacher, P. Kollár, A. Candinas, D. Beldi, G. Lachenmayer, A. Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection. METHODS: All patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133808/ /pubmed/35647004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.883210 Text en Copyright © 2022 Aeschbacher, Kollàr, Candinas, Beldi and Lachenmayer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Aeschbacher, P.
Kollár, A.
Candinas, D.
Beldi, G.
Lachenmayer, A.
The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
title The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
title_full The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
title_short The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study
title_sort role of surgical expertise and surgical access in retroperitoneal sarcoma resection – a retrospective study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.883210
work_keys_str_mv AT aeschbacherp theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT kollara theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT candinasd theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT beldig theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT lachenmayera theroleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT aeschbacherp roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT kollara roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT candinasd roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT beldig roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT lachenmayera roleofsurgicalexpertiseandsurgicalaccessinretroperitonealsarcomaresectionaretrospectivestudy