Cargando…
Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671 |
_version_ | 1784713654558523392 |
---|---|
author | Rossetti, Carlos Alberto Maurizio, Estefanía Rossi, Ursula Amaranta |
author_facet | Rossetti, Carlos Alberto Maurizio, Estefanía Rossi, Ursula Amaranta |
author_sort | Rossetti, Carlos Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO(2) dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9133814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91338142022-05-27 Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants Rossetti, Carlos Alberto Maurizio, Estefanía Rossi, Ursula Amaranta Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO(2) dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133814/ /pubmed/35647101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rossetti, Maurizio and Rossi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Rossetti, Carlos Alberto Maurizio, Estefanía Rossi, Ursula Amaranta Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants |
title | Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants |
title_full | Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants |
title_fullStr | Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants |
title_short | Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants |
title_sort | comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossetticarlosalberto comparativereviewofbrucellosisinsmalldomesticruminants AT maurizioestefania comparativereviewofbrucellosisinsmalldomesticruminants AT rossiursulaamaranta comparativereviewofbrucellosisinsmalldomesticruminants |