Cargando…

Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants

Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto, Maurizio, Estefanía, Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671
_version_ 1784713654558523392
author Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
Maurizio, Estefanía
Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
author_facet Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
Maurizio, Estefanía
Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
author_sort Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
collection PubMed
description Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO(2) dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9133814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91338142022-05-27 Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants Rossetti, Carlos Alberto Maurizio, Estefanía Rossi, Ursula Amaranta Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO(2) dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133814/ /pubmed/35647101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rossetti, Maurizio and Rossi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
Maurizio, Estefanía
Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
title Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
title_full Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
title_fullStr Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
title_short Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants
title_sort comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671
work_keys_str_mv AT rossetticarlosalberto comparativereviewofbrucellosisinsmalldomesticruminants
AT maurizioestefania comparativereviewofbrucellosisinsmalldomesticruminants
AT rossiursulaamaranta comparativereviewofbrucellosisinsmalldomesticruminants