Cargando…
Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS–EPI) and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS–EPI) for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the rat sciatic nerve. METHODS: Eight healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and scanned with a 3T MRI scanne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.844408 |
_version_ | 1784713672465055744 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yueyao Pan, Zhongxian Meng, Fanqi Li, Zhujing Hu, Yuanming Yu, Xuewen Gao, Jinyun Guo, Yihao Lyu, Hanqing Lin, Xiaofeng |
author_facet | Chen, Yueyao Pan, Zhongxian Meng, Fanqi Li, Zhujing Hu, Yuanming Yu, Xuewen Gao, Jinyun Guo, Yihao Lyu, Hanqing Lin, Xiaofeng |
author_sort | Chen, Yueyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS–EPI) and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS–EPI) for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the rat sciatic nerve. METHODS: Eight healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and scanned with a 3T MRI scanner using SS–EPI and RS–EPI DTI sequences. The image quality in terms of the morphology of the nerve, distortions of the nearby femur, muscles, and homogeneity of neuromuscular were evaluated and scored. The correlations between the DTI parameters including fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and histopathological parameters were calculated by using the Pearson correlation coefficient and compared by the modified Fisher Z-transform, respectively. RESULTS: The quality scores were higher for the images from the SS–EPI sequence compared with the RS–EPI sequence for characteristics such as sharpness of the sciatic nerve margin (P = 0.008), artifacts of the sciatic nerve (P = 0.008), and homogeneity of the neuromuscular region (P = 0.007), as well as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of DW images (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients were higher for the FA and RD values from the SS–EPI sequence compared with those from the RS–EPI sequence. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients between FA and myelin thickness (P = 0.027), FA and diameter of the myelinated fiber (P = 0.036), as well as RD and myelin thickness (P = 0.05) were statistically higher for the SS–EPI sequence compared with those for the RS–EPI sequence. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of the rat sciatic nerve showed that the image quality from the SS–EPI sequence was significantly higher compared with that from the RS–EPI sequence. Furthermore, the FA and RD derived from the SS–EPI sequence are promising and sensitive biomarkers to detect the histopathological changes in the rat sciatic nerve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9133884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91338842022-05-27 Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging Chen, Yueyao Pan, Zhongxian Meng, Fanqi Li, Zhujing Hu, Yuanming Yu, Xuewen Gao, Jinyun Guo, Yihao Lyu, Hanqing Lin, Xiaofeng Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS–EPI) and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS–EPI) for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the rat sciatic nerve. METHODS: Eight healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and scanned with a 3T MRI scanner using SS–EPI and RS–EPI DTI sequences. The image quality in terms of the morphology of the nerve, distortions of the nearby femur, muscles, and homogeneity of neuromuscular were evaluated and scored. The correlations between the DTI parameters including fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and histopathological parameters were calculated by using the Pearson correlation coefficient and compared by the modified Fisher Z-transform, respectively. RESULTS: The quality scores were higher for the images from the SS–EPI sequence compared with the RS–EPI sequence for characteristics such as sharpness of the sciatic nerve margin (P = 0.008), artifacts of the sciatic nerve (P = 0.008), and homogeneity of the neuromuscular region (P = 0.007), as well as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of DW images (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients were higher for the FA and RD values from the SS–EPI sequence compared with those from the RS–EPI sequence. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients between FA and myelin thickness (P = 0.027), FA and diameter of the myelinated fiber (P = 0.036), as well as RD and myelin thickness (P = 0.05) were statistically higher for the SS–EPI sequence compared with those for the RS–EPI sequence. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of the rat sciatic nerve showed that the image quality from the SS–EPI sequence was significantly higher compared with that from the RS–EPI sequence. Furthermore, the FA and RD derived from the SS–EPI sequence are promising and sensitive biomarkers to detect the histopathological changes in the rat sciatic nerve. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9133884/ /pubmed/35645709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.844408 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Pan, Meng, Li, Hu, Yu, Gao, Guo, Lyu and Lin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Chen, Yueyao Pan, Zhongxian Meng, Fanqi Li, Zhujing Hu, Yuanming Yu, Xuewen Gao, Jinyun Guo, Yihao Lyu, Hanqing Lin, Xiaofeng Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title | Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_full | Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_fullStr | Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_short | Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_sort | performance of single-shot echo-planar imaging in diffusion tensor imaging in rat sciatic nerve compared with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.844408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyueyao performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT panzhongxian performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT mengfanqi performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT lizhujing performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT huyuanming performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT yuxuewen performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT gaojinyun performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT guoyihao performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT lyuhanqing performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT linxiaofeng performanceofsingleshotechoplanarimagingindiffusiontensorimaginginratsciaticnervecomparedwithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging |