Cargando…

Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of women with uterine fibroids (UFs) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) treated with 300 mg elagolix twice daily plus add-back therapy (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg once daily) or placebo who were not considered responders in pooled analysis of two phase 3, 6-month randomized cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stewart, Elizabeth A., Archer, David F., Owens, Charlotte D., Barnhart, Kurt T., Bradley, Linda D., Feinberg, Eve C., Gillispie-Bell, Veronica, Imudia, Anthony N., Liu, Ran, Kim, Jin Hee, Al-Hendy, Ayman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34582715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0152
_version_ 1784713693505781760
author Stewart, Elizabeth A.
Archer, David F.
Owens, Charlotte D.
Barnhart, Kurt T.
Bradley, Linda D.
Feinberg, Eve C.
Gillispie-Bell, Veronica
Imudia, Anthony N.
Liu, Ran
Kim, Jin Hee
Al-Hendy, Ayman
author_facet Stewart, Elizabeth A.
Archer, David F.
Owens, Charlotte D.
Barnhart, Kurt T.
Bradley, Linda D.
Feinberg, Eve C.
Gillispie-Bell, Veronica
Imudia, Anthony N.
Liu, Ran
Kim, Jin Hee
Al-Hendy, Ayman
author_sort Stewart, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of women with uterine fibroids (UFs) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) treated with 300 mg elagolix twice daily plus add-back therapy (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg once daily) or placebo who were not considered responders in pooled analysis of two phase 3, 6-month randomized clinical trials (Elaris UF-1 and UF-2). METHODS: Responders were defined as women who met both primary end point bleeding criteria (<80 mL menstrual blood loss [MBL] during the final month and ≥50% reduction in MBL from baseline to the final month) and either completed the study or discontinued due to predefined reasons. Thus, women termed nonresponders who were analyzed in this study who met neither or one bleeding end point or met both criteria but prematurely discontinued treatment because of adverse events, perceived lack of efficacy, or required surgical or interventional treatment for UFs were analyzed in this study. This post hoc analysis assessed mean changes from baseline in MBL, as well as adverse events. RESULTS: Among 367 women receiving elagolix with add-back with observed data, 89 (24%) were not considered responders. Within this subset, 17 (19%) women met both bleeding criteria but prematurely discontinued treatment for the reasons mentioned above, while 23 (26%) met one bleeding criterion and 49 (55%) met neither bleeding criteria, regardless of discontinuation status. Among all nonresponders, a numerical trend toward greater mean reductions in MBL was observed in those receiving elagolix with add-back, compared with placebo group nonresponders. No differences in adverse events were observed between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Forty of 89 (45%) women with HMB and UFs who were classified as nonresponders in the UF-1 or UF-2 trials may have had a clinically meaningful response to elagolix with add-back therapy because they met at least one of the objective bleeding criteria. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02654054 and NCT02691494. (NEJM 2020; 382:328–340) DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904351
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9133968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91339682022-05-26 Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids Stewart, Elizabeth A. Archer, David F. Owens, Charlotte D. Barnhart, Kurt T. Bradley, Linda D. Feinberg, Eve C. Gillispie-Bell, Veronica Imudia, Anthony N. Liu, Ran Kim, Jin Hee Al-Hendy, Ayman J Womens Health (Larchmt) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of women with uterine fibroids (UFs) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) treated with 300 mg elagolix twice daily plus add-back therapy (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg once daily) or placebo who were not considered responders in pooled analysis of two phase 3, 6-month randomized clinical trials (Elaris UF-1 and UF-2). METHODS: Responders were defined as women who met both primary end point bleeding criteria (<80 mL menstrual blood loss [MBL] during the final month and ≥50% reduction in MBL from baseline to the final month) and either completed the study or discontinued due to predefined reasons. Thus, women termed nonresponders who were analyzed in this study who met neither or one bleeding end point or met both criteria but prematurely discontinued treatment because of adverse events, perceived lack of efficacy, or required surgical or interventional treatment for UFs were analyzed in this study. This post hoc analysis assessed mean changes from baseline in MBL, as well as adverse events. RESULTS: Among 367 women receiving elagolix with add-back with observed data, 89 (24%) were not considered responders. Within this subset, 17 (19%) women met both bleeding criteria but prematurely discontinued treatment for the reasons mentioned above, while 23 (26%) met one bleeding criterion and 49 (55%) met neither bleeding criteria, regardless of discontinuation status. Among all nonresponders, a numerical trend toward greater mean reductions in MBL was observed in those receiving elagolix with add-back, compared with placebo group nonresponders. No differences in adverse events were observed between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Forty of 89 (45%) women with HMB and UFs who were classified as nonresponders in the UF-1 or UF-2 trials may have had a clinically meaningful response to elagolix with add-back therapy because they met at least one of the objective bleeding criteria. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02654054 and NCT02691494. (NEJM 2020; 382:328–340) DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904351 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-05-01 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9133968/ /pubmed/34582715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0152 Text en © Elizabeth A. Stewart et al. 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stewart, Elizabeth A.
Archer, David F.
Owens, Charlotte D.
Barnhart, Kurt T.
Bradley, Linda D.
Feinberg, Eve C.
Gillispie-Bell, Veronica
Imudia, Anthony N.
Liu, Ran
Kim, Jin Hee
Al-Hendy, Ayman
Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids
title Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids
title_full Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids
title_fullStr Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids
title_short Reduction of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women Not Designated as Responders to Elagolix Plus Add Back Therapy for Uterine Fibroids
title_sort reduction of heavy menstrual bleeding in women not designated as responders to elagolix plus add back therapy for uterine fibroids
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34582715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0152
work_keys_str_mv AT stewartelizabetha reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT archerdavidf reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT owenscharlotted reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT barnhartkurtt reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT bradleylindad reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT feinbergevec reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT gillispiebellveronica reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT imudiaanthonyn reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT liuran reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT kimjinhee reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids
AT alhendyayman reductionofheavymenstrualbleedinginwomennotdesignatedasresponderstoelagolixplusaddbacktherapyforuterinefibroids