Cargando…
Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study
The coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viruses. The pandemic has emerged as a global public health crisis, and the threat of fast-spreading of the latest variants of the coronavirus (such as omicron, delta) is rampant....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00580-022-03356-y |
_version_ | 1784713727840354304 |
---|---|
author | Seetha, Dayakar Ravikumar, Amjesh Nair, Radhakrishnan R. |
author_facet | Seetha, Dayakar Ravikumar, Amjesh Nair, Radhakrishnan R. |
author_sort | Seetha, Dayakar |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viruses. The pandemic has emerged as a global public health crisis, and the threat of fast-spreading of the latest variants of the coronavirus (such as omicron, delta) is rampant. Therefore, a fast and reliable diagnostic assay is needed to make the clinical decision for further treatment. The study aims to develop a Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC)–modified qualitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) assay and parallel assessment of commercially available RT-qPCR assay (Altona, Seegene, BD, and GBC) to detect SARS-CoV-2. Two hundred nine samples were chosen randomly out of around two hundred thousand samples. The panel consisted of SARS-CoV-2-positive (n = 156) and SARS-CoV-2-negative (n = 52) nasopharyngeal swab specimens for a primary clinical evaluation. Furthermore, 29 positive samples were sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Minion technology. Two hundred nine patient sample data of the cycle threshold (Ct) readings for target genes of five assays are 100% sensitive for Ct values. Mean Ct values for N1, N2, RdRp, S, and E of the positive controls in CDC assay, RealStar(®), Allplex, GBC, and SD Biosensor were 17.5 ± 0.49, 16.9 ± 0.51, 20 ± 0.49, 21.7 ± 0.38, and 23.1 ± 0.43, respectively. F test value shows ≥ 1, which was statistically significant. All assays showed an efficiency of < 120% and R squares were < 0.99, which is well above the required threshold value. Thus, when taking the CDC-modified assay as a gold standard, the other four assays demonstrated a p value of 0.0000, concordance at 100%, and a Kappa at 1.000. A maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was constructed and compared based on full-length SARS-CoV-2 with Wuhan isolate. These isolates are closely related to the B.1.617 lineage and reference sequences. Therefore, we conclude that all RT-PCR kits assessed in this study shall be used for routine diagnostics of COVID-19 in patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00580-022-03356-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9134141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91341412022-05-26 Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study Seetha, Dayakar Ravikumar, Amjesh Nair, Radhakrishnan R. Comp Clin Path Brief Communication The coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viruses. The pandemic has emerged as a global public health crisis, and the threat of fast-spreading of the latest variants of the coronavirus (such as omicron, delta) is rampant. Therefore, a fast and reliable diagnostic assay is needed to make the clinical decision for further treatment. The study aims to develop a Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC)–modified qualitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) assay and parallel assessment of commercially available RT-qPCR assay (Altona, Seegene, BD, and GBC) to detect SARS-CoV-2. Two hundred nine samples were chosen randomly out of around two hundred thousand samples. The panel consisted of SARS-CoV-2-positive (n = 156) and SARS-CoV-2-negative (n = 52) nasopharyngeal swab specimens for a primary clinical evaluation. Furthermore, 29 positive samples were sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Minion technology. Two hundred nine patient sample data of the cycle threshold (Ct) readings for target genes of five assays are 100% sensitive for Ct values. Mean Ct values for N1, N2, RdRp, S, and E of the positive controls in CDC assay, RealStar(®), Allplex, GBC, and SD Biosensor were 17.5 ± 0.49, 16.9 ± 0.51, 20 ± 0.49, 21.7 ± 0.38, and 23.1 ± 0.43, respectively. F test value shows ≥ 1, which was statistically significant. All assays showed an efficiency of < 120% and R squares were < 0.99, which is well above the required threshold value. Thus, when taking the CDC-modified assay as a gold standard, the other four assays demonstrated a p value of 0.0000, concordance at 100%, and a Kappa at 1.000. A maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was constructed and compared based on full-length SARS-CoV-2 with Wuhan isolate. These isolates are closely related to the B.1.617 lineage and reference sequences. Therefore, we conclude that all RT-PCR kits assessed in this study shall be used for routine diagnostics of COVID-19 in patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00580-022-03356-y. Springer London 2022-05-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9134141/ /pubmed/35637662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00580-022-03356-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Seetha, Dayakar Ravikumar, Amjesh Nair, Radhakrishnan R. Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
title | Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
title_full | Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
title_fullStr | Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
title_short | Comparative performance of CDC-modified SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
title_sort | comparative performance of cdc-modified sars-cov-2 real-time pcr assay with four different commercial assays: laboratory-based study |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00580-022-03356-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seethadayakar comparativeperformanceofcdcmodifiedsarscov2realtimepcrassaywithfourdifferentcommercialassayslaboratorybasedstudy AT ravikumaramjesh comparativeperformanceofcdcmodifiedsarscov2realtimepcrassaywithfourdifferentcommercialassayslaboratorybasedstudy AT nairradhakrishnanr comparativeperformanceofcdcmodifiedsarscov2realtimepcrassaywithfourdifferentcommercialassayslaboratorybasedstudy |